Why should there be an entry barrier based on the amount of tokens owned? Am I any less a supporter of the blocknet because I own less than 1000 tokens? Is my voice somehow less relevant? Setting a barrier to entry based on the number of tokens owned flies in the face of the whole cryptocurrency movement. It's crap.
Perhaps you misunderstood.
Allow me to clarify.
There will never be any barrier to entry to the Slack chat. Anyone is welcome to register for Slack and to follow the activity taking place there.
My intention is to create a private group within the Slack chat for verified holders of a set amount of tokens.
I think that both the supporters/investors and the Blocknet developers would value having such a space where everyone has a verified vested interest in the project.
However, you are right that this would precipitate the unfortunate scenario where some token holders would not be invited to the private group within the public Slack chat.
And that is why I am asking for input.
Ok. I understand. I'm sure you have considered how the existence of a private group within the larger group appears exclusionary and how that just might not resonate well with the the excluded "have not so manys". How long will it take for the private group to begin to exert itself in the matter of policy decisions? It's like the current structure of publicly held corporations where the elitist boards of directors get to call the shots while the regular shareholders lack any real say (by and large, granting the occasional exception) in how the company is run.
As soon as you create an arbitrary line between "us" and "them" you begin to descend a slippery slope.