If you really want to work on a "learning experience" I'd suggest you do just that and stop wasting your time with "Quazarcoin" which hasn't really added anything to this process at all.
So now I'm wasting my time? I was under the impression that you are a developer, but I guess I was wrong. Don't you realize that if I develop a HTML wallet for Quazarcoin, that the same wallet could be used , with minor modifications, on other cryptonote coins as well? The API is the same.
Yes I'm well aware that the coins use largely the same API. I also complemented your effort in working on a learning project.
I think you are the same person who goes to the Quazarcoin threads and trashtalks Quazarcoin.
If I've commented about Quazarcoin at all, it was giving what I believe to be correct information, not trashtalking. For example, someone on there asked a little while ago if the changes pushed by the Quazarcoin developer during his most recent short appearance were the same as the changes from the cyptonotecoin repo, and I indicated that they were. I may have also pointed out that there isn't any actual development going on there, only caretaking (I think in response to a question). For example in the form of merging changes from cryptonotecoin without explaining their origin, leaving the impression that actual original development was being done. If that kind of accurate information is trashtalking to you, then so be it. More likely it is the reality that makes you uncomfortable, and you blame me for pointing it out to you (ignorance is bliss).
I'm responding to you here because I happen to think you are way off base attacking the original poster who did a ton of hard work to uncover and document a rather sophisticated fraud effort.
I still don't see any of this as trash talking, but to each his own I guess.