Do you realize what you're saying here?
You go out of your way to expose villains that lie about a premine in their altcoin. Yet you claim that the Bytecoin developers are not villians despite lying about an 82% premine.
Did they claim there was a lower premine? If so prove it to me.
Yes many times. Here is one.
At the time we didn't even know what we know now about the blockchain, whitepapers, etc. being faked.
BTW, they also deliberately crippled the miner and then launched a half dozen to a dozen shill clone coins (including your favorite Quazarcoin) allowing them to mine a lot of coins on each and every one using their un-crippled miner at very little cost. (No the "fast" miner trumpeted by the developer of QCN at launch was nothing of the sort. It was a bit faster than the public miner but at least an order of magnitude or two slower than the real miner.)
Oh, folkes.
That's so weird to tell about BCN "pre mine" and BMR no-premine as its advantage. You know, people who will find out BMR much more later will say that you premined BMR. Just because they will be late for low diffs.
And they will think it's unfair distribution, because you have coins and they don't. As you do it now.
People will start to do their own "fair" forkes. As a result we will have hundreds useless coins as Bitcoin's ones. It's so stupid and irritating.
Btw I offer not to call BCN situation as "premine", because it's significantly other situation.