Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Is Bitcoin good enough; there aren't critically important improvements needed?
by
UnunoctiumTesticles
on 03/12/2014, 10:45:08 UTC
Unfortunately CoinJoin is jammable otherwise we could get on chain anonymity without a fork of Bitcoin's protocol.

I've not yet had a need for externally assisted anonymity. Perhaps someday I will.

The governments haven't really started confiscating yet but they are planning to[1][2].

Also let's not forget UDP and FTP came before adoption of TCP/IP and HTTP respectively.

I think that merely serves to strengthen my point. These relatively ancient protocols are still in widespread use,  no?

My mea culpa upthread was to acknowledge that Bitcoin has virtues and will continue.

I am not positing a total annihilation of Bitcoin by an anonymous protocol coin. Rather in this poll I am asking if there is any interest in such experimentation.


They would not want to move very fast on regulation, because they want all of you to remain deluded for as long as possible, and so will act only when it is time to take all your wealth (when the shit hits the fan global collapse ensues[1]).

[1]http://armstrongeconomics.com/2014/12/01/the-government-know-sovereign-debt-defaults-are-coming/
http://armstrongeconomics.com/2014/12/01/changing-bankruptcy-laws-for-banks/
http://armstrongeconomics.com/2014/12/02/can-money-just-be-devalued-creating-deflation-as-a-solution/