...
did you read it "The Second Bitcoin Auction" and "27 Bids" it was published yesterday. It can't be 30k and 27 bids and be a repost. How can someone repost from July with facts about the number of bids (27) for a second auction 5 months in the future.
Like I said, they wrote the article yesterday and got their facts wrong / mixed up. A bit like you really.
Protip: Take a chunk of the text from the article you feel may be a repost/plagiarized, and ctrl V it in Google's search box. Now look at results:

Note the date. Unless great minds think alike, this was ctrl V journalism.

Modernity, gentlemen, and livin' is easy.