Post
Topic
Board Off-topic
Re: Scientific proof that God exists?
by
bl4kjaguar
on 05/12/2014, 23:47:04 UTC
In comes cooldgamer with... ignorance

I got a WOT warning just trying to go to that site, that says something

The whale.to site is controversial, that is for sure.

You can read Pye's article elsewhere, like here.

If something is indeed a "proof" then it shouldn't matter the source.  Especially in the case of abstract proofs, there is often a verifiable "best" answer which cannot be possibly be improved.  If the source needs to be called into question, then it is either not actually proof at all, or the proof has been misunderstood.