Seen that coming from 5 miles away.
What exactly did you "see coming"?
Does the OP want to offer any proof of his claims? The burden of proof is on the accuser. I can say that the majority of his claims are not true.
Account is hacked.
That alone is enough proof.
This is a perfect example of why I don't want to restore accounts (for the most part). While bayuo obviously did control the Zedicus account at one point, and is probably the original owner, there appears to be a pretty good reason he doesn't anymore (I won't elaborate for privacy reasons). Though there really is no way to be
positive either way.
Exemplifies perfectly what I was saying the other day about signing addresses not being conclusive proof that the person signing *should* be in control of that account.
Can we get any conformation from staff if they check ip logs in case of hacked accounts.
Yes, but it isn't conclusive proof anymore than signing an address is, just a piece of evidence.