Can you prove the account was actually purchased by you?
Do you have proof of payment?
Yes. Everything is in PM's from our purchase including the payment address.
Please provide proof in public. If you want to make a claim then the burden is on you to prove your case, not on me to prove my innocence. Have you ever hear of innocent until proven guilty?
Do you have any evidence that Quicksilver and ACCTseller are the same person?
Before I answer this. Do you publicly deny that ACCTseller is not your alternate account? If you don't deny this, why did you need to ask this question?
See my above comment. If you cannot prove a claim then you should not make such claim. I do not need to deny anything, it is on you to prove what you say is true.
What specific term of our agreement was breached as a result of your discovery of
this thread (the thread referenced in your OP)?
That whole thread is about Zedicus being a HACKED account. You assured me that this was not the case before purchase. Why do I want to give you money for YOUR baggage? I didn't want to be involved in this. IF I had known these details before purchase, I would have (like any other reasonable person) turned down the offer.
Where is the proof that zedicus is a hacked account? Both theymos and BadBear have said (on reddit and the "bayuo" thread that there is not evidence of such to support giving the account back to bayuo. They have more information that anyone else on here has. The only proof that I have seen is something that would indicate that the account was
previously owned by bayuo.
As a result of freedom of speech, anyone is able to make any claim they wish, despite the lack of truth to such claim
Do you have any proof that you have actually applied to join a signature campaign?
Why did not not publicly attempt to join a signature campaign as the rules of most/all signature campaigns state that you must do?
Yes. Because I have pm'd the operators before applying to see whether this tainted account can or cannot be used in signature campaigns.
Provide such proof.
Why would it be appropriate for me to "take" the account back?
Simple. You lied to me to get a sale. You did not tell me this account was under dispute with the original owner. No one would have purchased this account if they had known. Should I make a poll about this?
Did you specifically inquire about a dispute of ownership? If so then what was my response? Please provide proof.
If you did not make such inquiry then what statement did I make that was a lie? Please provide proof.
You cannot rely on hypothetical situations to support a claim.
Why have you not taken my advice as to how to sell an account and attempt to do so?
Because at the end of the day, I couldn't bring myself to sell this account. Who would want it?
Why did you ask for help selling it only days ago? What
changed between then and now that caused you to not want to sell the account?
Someone who is wanting to earn money by posting in a signature campaign who is interested in Bitcoin would want the account.
Can you provide any examples of an (alleged or not) scammer has been banned?
Which specific forum rule are you accusing me of breaking that would cause me to deserve a ban?
The same rule that applies if I sell iPhone 6's in the marketplace and ship poo instead.
A search for "poo" in the
market place rules and guidelines comes up with no results. A similar search in the
Unoffical list of official forum rules thread shows several results discussing pools, but nothing regarding "poo"
Please provide a link that proves I broke a forum rule (if one were to assume your allegations are true).
At which point was current ownership proven in the "bayuo" thread?
The part where he signs a message. Instead of asking stupid questions, go and read the thread.
At which point was
currentownership proven? A signed message does not proof current ownership, it only proves previous ownership. If ownership was proven then how/why are you still in possession of the account?