The problem is, your 'promoting' service, as you know, had the effect of encouraging hapless newcomers to the scene into buying coins based on your tweets. That encouragement was based on your financial incentive to do so and not due to anything the coin offers people as an investment or otherwise. I remember clear as day reading some of your tweets in disgust and despite the fact they are now ominously deleted (I just checked how far they now go back, is that why you dared me to find one - because they no longer exist?), they were not promoting, which would have been factual statements about the coins, but comments like 'i'm buying xxx' 'xxx is looking great for this week and long term'. Alluding to a roi, that is the problem.

I doubt you laughed like to claim, that is merely a trite attempt to discredit the legitimacy of what I am saying to those reading that know no better. I don't want people to buy coins which have devs with a dubious, certainly unethical past.

Based on the what I have seen from your tweeting history there is not any room for debate on who is right. You are again simply trying to label me as something to justify to others why I am criticising you. This is because you cannot refute your past.