Completely disagree with you.
Yes, disagreeing seems to be a favorite activity for you.

Yes, I disagree with stupidity and blind favoritism. I'm not on anyone's side, only truth and logic. You on the other hand consistently base your arguments on 'guesswork' and 'assumptions'. I typically stick up for the underdog when I see he's got a case, especially when a pack of morons are ganging up on him with shitty logic and reasoning. So until I hear otherwise or see some real evidence to the contrary, I think any objective 3rd party with half a brain could see that I've got a solid argument.
Either way, it just makes it a disagreement between the two and a argument between the two, it doesn't make him a scammer so Vod shouldn't be involved here at all unless he's got some sort of concrete proof of something otherwise, which I see none of anywhere.
By that logic, none of the mods or anyone trusted should be leaving any trust for anyone unless
they were a party to the transaction.
Correct 100%, either a party to it or have some actual proof the person is blatantly scamming or a career scammer. IF they feel the irresistible urge to get involved in much more complicated matters such as this one, they should be willing to do a lot more than Vod has done before taking any sort of action and then be prepared to explain their actions to the community if it becomes necessary ESPECIALLY in a case where a full member with positive trust has been damaged.
Maybe that's a little too much logic and fairness for you to take in all at once.