1. Leaving -ve feedback on businesses that has not scammed anyone, but competing a company, where he is a shareholder.
2. Leaving -ve trust on people talking against HaveLock, because he is a shareholder over there.
3. Did not leave -ve trust on Hashie, though they were doing everything same the others are accused of, except that they started to resell the hash power of a company, where he is a shareholder.
1. I don't need to wait till they've ripped people off in order to leave negative feedback and my reasoning for doing so and conditions for removal are sound. When leaving negative feedback it quite clearly states:
Negative - You were scammed or you strongly believe that this person is a scammer.
-
Same logic applies to HaveLock. Just like PB mining has fallen, BTCT & GLBSE has fallen too. So why did not you leave -ve feedback on HaveLock and on the companies trying to rip off people through HaveLock ? Just because U *think* they are good boy ?2. I'm not a shareholder of Havelock.
-
When I say someone is a shareholder of NYSE, it means he owns a stock that is traded on NYSE.3. I didn't leave negative feedback for most cloud mining companies, just a select few.
-
U r dodging my Q. I asked u about a specific company which has already scammed people by deleting the referral table from database.The motto of the whole group that is doing hulla-hoop over here is simple. This group can mostly be identified by their sig containing different companies traded on HaveLock. A few are also pushing through various threads they create. The motto is to push stock values up by applying
Goebbels theory. You guys have bought them low and wanna sell them high.
By the way, why dont u ask for a pic of your God, err FriedCat ? Is it crime to ask for the pic of a person who
returned 200 BTC in one day and
raised 800 BTC in one week ? That would help u to worship him when HaveLock crashes !!!