It's obvious Hashfast made promises they could not keep because they never hedged. They did not keep a sizeable buffer of refund money in BTC. They did not get a reinsurance contract with a company like Swiss Re.
That shows either malicious intent or incompetence.
HF never claimed to be hedging with our BTC. Where did you get the idea they were? You just pulled that out of your ass.
Judge Montali specifically asked the US ATTY for evidence of fraud and/or incompetence. She could not produce any.
At tremendous expense, about a dozen lawyers have gone over HF with a fine-tooth comb and found nothing amiss.
Businesses fail all the time due to nothing except bad luck and adverse market conditions, despite what PM's shitty atty says.
Get over your conceit that you are so smart only an evil villain could possibly cause you to lose BTC.
You had months in court to prove that, but completely failed to do anything but destroy our chances for compensation.
How much of a fuckwit are you to keep repeating debunked conspiracy theories about reinsurance and buffers, when such notions never had a basis in reality?
The only malicious intent and incompetence in this situation is to be found on the haters' side, in the form of defamation and repetition of buyer's remorse masquerading as cause for offense.