Invalid Premise #1 is "full BTC refund means the EXACT NUMBER of BTC paid NO MATTER WHAT"
This was debunked months ago. It was a ridiculous, impossible interpretation constructed to benefit the cupidity of its proponents. There are many highly imaginative subplots to this conspiracy theory involving hedges, reinsurance, and secret escrow accounts, none of which were ever mentioned by HF or their TOS.
This was debunked months ago. It was a ridiculous, impossible interpretation constructed to benefit the cupidity of its proponents. There are many highly imaginative subplots to this conspiracy theory involving hedges, reinsurance, and secret escrow accounts, none of which were ever mentioned by HF or their TOS.
Who says it's invalid? You?
How was this debunked? Please refresh my memory.
The Hon. Dennis Montali of the United States Bankruptcy Court's Northern District of California says the windfall/fraud/incompetence/scam/criminal/thief claims are rubbish.
That's why HF is in Chapter 11, and not Chapter 7 like PM and MM wanted.
The 'Magic Full BTC Pony' claims were first debunked authoritatively several months ago, in HF's response to PMorici's Windfall Demand Letter. Please read it and LEARN HOW TO FACT.
