QuarkFX you are even more a phony than silvermetal. You all but admitted in the Bottlecaps thread that while part of the Quark Foundation you participated willingly with Digital Industry in part of a scam involving pumping CAPs and that the profits would be used to pump Quark. As I said in that thread it is interesting that you turn on DigitalIndustry only after the plan failed. You have no morals, your attack on Digital Industry is out of scorn and bitterness. You think DigitalIndustry is a bad guy...well I would say you are worse to leech on to him and follow him until it didn't serve you anymore.
You were not even around for the first 6 months of Quark. You are just a bandwagon tagalong that came to Quark during the Dec2013 hype, likely buying at the peak of a 10000% 3day rise in price like a fool and are desperate to blame anyone but yourself. Such a tagalong and so desperate to be part of the group you even felt the need to have quark in your name.
Time for the two of you to move on.
You were not even around for the first 6 months of Quark. You are just a bandwagon tagalong that came to Quark during the Dec2013 hype, likely buying at the peak of a 10000% 3day rise in price like a fool and are desperate to blame anyone but yourself. Such a tagalong and so desperate to be part of the group you even felt the need to have quark in your name.
Time for the two of you to move on.
Uhm wut? I was on the CAPs thread? Then why don't you quote me? And I participated in a scam? Tell me more.
This is going to be entertaining.
Yeah wrong person...got you mixed up with Coinmama. Whoops... Oh well now you know what its like to get accused of things that make no sense which is pretty much all that silvermetal does to people.
Awwwww such a nice excuse. So let me wrap up: when silvermetal questions the liability of some newly created accounts that are mostly doing anything but cheering for Digitalindustry you show up and complain about such behaviour. However when you falsly accuse other members then this receives anything but "whoops" and - even better - "there you have it".
I acknowledged I mixed you up with Coinmama. I didn't falsely accuse you I got you mixed up with another user...that is called a mistake. Not too complicated even for you.
Quote
And btw. I am still interested in proof for the scam Coinmama carried out. Let me guess: Someone told ya?
Yes someone did...Coinmama. She posted PMs between herself and DigitalIndustry (and the rest of the Quark Foundation) that illustrated an attempt to pump CAPs and use the profit to pump QRK. So I asked her why she didn't share that info immediately...instead of months later when it didn't work out showing her morality is false. Alas she went silent.https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=241445.msg9586936#msg9586936
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=241445.msg9587410#msg9587410
Of course you accused me lol. The reason for that (mixing me up) doesn't change that. Not too difficult to understand, right, "even for you".
With regard to Coinmama you accused her to have participated in a scam while now you turn it into "she remained silent" because she didn't go on the record immediately.
I know the correspondence very well and I know how she reacted to it. There was never any acknowledgement, quite the contrary, she was the one who fired against that type of "plans". She simply didn't tell you and it's clear why: because this type of info would severely harm the reputation of Quark. Digitalindustry was at that time still considered to be an important person by both: the community and the core team. He was one out of 5 members who was invited to a private chat with Max Guevara who till then wasn't responding to more or less anyone. Coinmama went on the record when things became really nasty aka Digitalindustry and Vic attempting to carry out the proposed scam with Mimiccoin. If I wanted I could post the long correspondence in which she, Orm, Hai and me observed the coin and speculated over being what looked exactly like the scam being plan in forehand. But heck, you can see that even without the correspondence.
Even for someone with poor background knowledge it should be understandable that there are good reasons not to easily post this kind of stuff on btctalk - maybe you don't understand the impact or you don't get that this kind of crazytalk is rather the norm with Digitalindustry. Vic had one (even though - as it turned out - bad) reason to collaborate with Digitalindustry: he thought he was the link to Max Guevara who till then didn't speak to anyone. However, Digitalindustry claimed to be in close contact with Max, even pretended to beclose friends (this type of stuff is still online on forum.qrk.cc). After moderating the chat with Max, it was clear to be a false impression, Max commented on that in the chat.
Again, you are accusing Coinmama, based on the simple fact that you have no understanding of the timeline. That's also why you have no proof. Like every good conspiracy theorist you are "just asking questions". That's laughable and hypocritic. There is plenty of proof that DI and Vic carried out an insider knowledge scam, yet you remained silent on that while now you try to accuse the person who was probably most actively against this endeavor. Let me comment on this using your words: "Whooops"