Since everyone thinks I'm either Josh or a GAW shill, let me share something about XPY that is bothering me.  I've been following this situation for months despite my lack of posts.  Allow me to play devil's advocate (from your point of view.)

This entire dispute over the naming of the coin shouldn't be happening, according to prior statements by Josh.

http://gawminers.eu/news/hashcoin-ico-customer-round-qa-transcript-yesterday-evening/

"“HashCoin” is the code name for the coin, not the actual name that it will bear. We purchased the rights to the most popular name an online currency could ever have. That deal finished today."

This interviewer also had the impression that Josh had already purchased the rights to the name (unrevealed at the time of the interview)

https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/hashcoin-hashbase-will-bring-bitcoin-mainstream-interview-with-gawminers-josh-garza/


So unless the original developer of PYC sold the rights to him, I am at a loss to explain how we have arrived at this situation.

I am trying to be neutral here.  My first post in this thread was prompted by what I thought was a very dedicated troll that I found amusing.  Perhaps my initial assessment was wrong.  I don't know.  But I certainly have no agenda beyond that.