Like it or not we now have a thief as one of the large stakeholders on the rich list.
He has no motivation to dump, anymore than any large stakeholder does. Who knows, he might even make donations to help his investment.
So, please stop with all this worrying. It doesnt help, does it? Or maybe that's the point?
OPAL dodged a bullet. Let us be thankful that there no rollback to deal with forever in the future and we can get back to improving things.
James
I'm not worried, it just 'sucks'. Difference is, his entry point is 0. No one else got in @ 0. He will always be 100% profitable. Believe me, by no means in this instance would I have liked a roll back, I really, truly hope, that people stop trusting every fkng thing they see written on the internet.. dont go to funky links, pay attention..never ever trust something is @ face value.. this is simple web browsing 101.
If there is any silver lining here, it is that due to his zero cost basis, at some point in the future some lucky buyer will get below market OPAL, if he decides to dump cuz his cost basis was 0. If he doesnt, then there is no problem. So the worst that happens is a temporary price drop, we congratulate the lucky buyer whose buy order they never thought would fill, filled. And we move on.
What else to do? OPAL's value is not affected by the fact that one guy has zero cost basis for it.
James
Can't do anything, it's just now a long play.