If you look at the timestamps, Fluffy pony made those comments before shadowsend v2 was open source...
Busted...
Fudders gonna fud...Great chance to snatch up more SDC at these levels

Not sure if I'm misunderstanding Longenecker or everyone else is. My initial comments were made after reviewing 1 of the 2 commits to the "anon" branch, the 2nd commit didn't exist at the time. It would be impossible for me to have foreknowledge as to what would be contained in the commit, and any idiot can look at the first commit and also observe that it didn't contain generateRingSignature(), nor were the verification functions wired up. I'm certainly not "busted" or "fudding", and if that's anyone's takeaway from me making a clear observation then they need to seriously revisit that persecution complex of theirs.
It would have been possible to poke your head into IRC though if you had a question.
*edit* Also, are you really trying to advertise for Monero here?
I see nothing wrong with healthy debate about code. We can learn from each other. Its not all or nothing. Many of us have eggs in multiple baskets.
Diversification of thought and investment portfolios is a good thing as is constructive criticism
It's healthy, but the difference is that you bagholder of ANC, and still have not bought SDC
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=227287.msg9878994#msg9878994I don't know what you just said but ANC has always been awesome to SDC.
Also, the fud escalated with the price Hueristic. It happens, I just wouldn't have expected anything other than "hey, i can prove it isn't anonymous" to be effective. Since no one has done that I will continue to hold SDC. Sorry to see your disdain. I would be willing to bet IRC would treat you better and provide answers to questions you might have.