This is a lie.
Originally the premise was that new people (who did not have anything) would be given money and this would make it more fair.
Not at all. It's about how creating money : for all, or for some ? In a time-space (global) perspective only dm/m = Constant => m = Exp (ct) is a solution.
So which is true?
Either value is taken from people with existing holdings (in order to add value to those who previously had nothing) or nothing is given to people who have nothing.
It is one or the other. It is impossible to be both.
This is the classical asymetric mistake.
Who bring value ? The old on a money system, or the newcomers in the money system ?
Who decide ? You ?
From the newcomer point of view the old ones own possibly no added value, from the old ones newcomers possibly own no added value, from a Universal Dividend point of view no Human Being has power to decide for the others what is value and is not (but human being itself, as only universal value of any economic system).
Money is NOT value. Joining a money system has nothing to do with value, but with a common tool for EXCHANGE value, in a fair way between members.