Alright you`ve convinced me, very good arguments you`ve made. How about then specialized decentralized voting system?

The same system that i`ve talked before: anonymous,decentralized,equal,everyone can participate, BUT, and there is the difference, people can only vote in their area of expertise.

For example if we have a doctor, then he could only vote about the laws on medicine and general health. So that each draft law would be given some tags, and only those who are expert on those tags could vote for it.

A sort of union of workers, but non in the marxist sense, but a true decentralized and anynymous system. We would keep the division of labor, the anonymity and the decentralization.

Plus there would be no way of one doctor to say monopolize himself and make every other doctor vote in their own interests.So this way those who are lazy and uninteligent, and have no clue about anything in the world, they would not have voting rights, pretty rough but if you choose by merits then this is the corrent way to do, who would want to be run by incompetent brainwashed grunts?, while those who are multilingual and expert on different fields like me, could vote on several categories.

I mean i dont have an economic degree, but i could vote/run the economy much better than the nowadays Keynesian nutjobs who inflate a ponzi scheme debt bubble, heck even a kindengartner can run the economy better, because even he knows that falling prices/inflation is good for the economy, but these Keynesian nubjobs just cant get it.

So perhaps this decentralized voting by merits is more balanced, and would be more efficient than the one i proposed earlier.