you are partially correct. I put in a lot of assets at below market and so I shouldnt have to triple the value of what I essentially donated, but the divisor is 90% of the total.
My calculation shows 0.0234 as the threshold and really, not much chance of this happening at this point so no sense in getting all worked up about it.
However on the off chance that it happens, I would like to share the bonus with everyone that has helped SuperNET to get to where it is. There are 300+ people in the SuperNET slack now, a large number of them working really hard and while I was critical to get the SuperNET started, already I am becoming a small part of the big picture.
I expect some large controversy over how it will be split up, but I think giving everyone in Slack the ability to allocate some part of the bonus would be a decent way.
Something like, we rank everyone's contribution according to a sliding scale. Maybe simply the number of posts in Slack, or hours worked, or servers contributed, etc. So, maybe 5 categories of people, each with a different wt and they can allocate a proportional amount of the bonus to 3 to 5 people, using open voting.
Tally it up and distribute out the SuperNET.
What do you think?
James
So those "bonus price points" are like dumping points?

Investors have to dump before them or get dumped on?

if there are any group of 100+ people who will hodl the SuperNET for a while, it is the people most actively working on it. Maybe some amount of selling to pay bills, but I wouldnt expect any large scale selling as it will be distributed fairly widely and evenly.
average of a few hundred to 100+ people, not exactly making a dumping ground. If anything, having that many people having a personal stake worth a few thousand USD might just have a very powerful effect as with a supercharged SuperNET the high end potential is quite good. What is worth a few thousand USD now, could well be worth quite a bit more in 6 months
James