I see plenty of justification in being skeptical, sure you folks count me as a gloom and doom character but despite all I question, I still hold SYS.  I am however still not convinced even after a 20BTC pump and 7 instances of cold feet on bittrex logged today, until I see a wallet release that includes a market UI embedded within the wallet, I am still skeptical.  It really isn't brain surgery after the initial code base has been completed and I've been provided no answers as to the reasoning behind this, which ultimately lead to speculation, and a bit more than that.  All that I've seen leads me to believe that crypto needs regulation not unlike our current primary monetary systems, specifically the banks.  So conceptually yes, it is a good thing SYS did what it did in order to attract the attention needed to avert disaster for this form of currency.  The big problem to contend with is the internet kill switch, without com, it cannot perpetuate existence.  Good luck on the BTC 2.0 part as I believe a newly adopted currency will not have a "dark market", or a market at all and why even bother since the mob running this country for the last 80 or so years has lowered it's standards to include legalization of dope, but it should support having such ported to it via RPC.  Anonymous Ebay in a box is asking for trouble in todays society.  But hey, these are my thoughts shared with the community in hopes of the development of something better than what the corrupt prick bankers of a fiat currency we are forced to use can do.


Probably not unhappy it was going up at all, but likely saw the opportunity to get out and avert loss after the nasty roller coaster ride.  Two sides to every story.