The invalid concept of a windfall is no "secret" and anyone who bothered to ask a lawyer (or just think about it) would have realized that. It's obvious that the windfall-seekers tuned out any analysis contrary to their confirmation bias in favor of magical free ponies.
How is HF responsible for individuals' impossible expectations and lack of due diligence?
Aren't the individuals responsible for their crazy belief in a free lunch?
Why are so many people here so eager to eschew their own culpability for voluntarily making an extremely risky bet on ASIC pre-orders?
It's easier to play the victim and pretend greed wasn't a factor, but I'd rather man up than be a sore loser.
So now you are stating that customers should always check with a lawyer what a company promises them? Is this what you always do when you are promised something by a company? Is this a normal thing to do? When I order something from Amazon and I see a 30-day money back guarantee sign I don't go to a lawyer to check the validity of that statement.
The fact that HF customers should check every statement with a lawyer implies from the start that the company is not trustworthy and is hiding something or lying about something or is trying to trick its customers by default. At least we got this covered now.
Now will you stop reviving this useless thread? This company is selling nothing now and all its assets were sold for 400k. End of story!