I don't understand each of the different reward structures so well, and when I tried to research, that article came up. Could you try assuming good faith for a while? How come you're calling me out for asking a question but not anyone who keeps on saying that the paybase reviews were false after they've been shown to be false? It seems that you only say something when you don't like something I say. Is that impression wrong?
I'm getting tired of your multi-page sandbox arguments "who started what first" and "you are more wrong than I am". Like this now above - this is not some kind of affirmative action, I don't have to call out an equal number of posters on each side of a debate just to make you happy. But if you insist you can go dig through 500 pages and find people of all persuasions being yelled at by me for any number of reasons - mainly just because I'm a grumpy old git perhaps.
In other words - grow up, gain some skin, maybe research your posts a bit more, or not, whatever. Post what you think is relevant and stop worrying that someone somewhere somehow interpreted it differently than you expected. I reserve the right to ridicule you as long as you insist on presenting poorly sourced info as undeniable facts and doing a page of nitpicking for each on-topic post. If you need a source for that - Matthew 7:5.