Thought cypherdoc might like this article by Daniel Krawisz
http://bitcoinist.net/the-two-ideologies-in-bitcoin/
I am sort of imagining it as what underlies his arguments that he doesnt like sidechains.
http://bitcoinist.net/the-two-ideologies-in-bitcoin/
I am sort of imagining it as what underlies his arguments that he doesnt like sidechains.
If you make a commitment to stick around and address all my concerns instead of lobbing in a comment every hundred pages or so then maybe I'll take the effort to repeat everything I've already said.
I read a few dozen pages some weeks back, so I think I got a fair flavour of the substantive arguments mixed in now and then. Others seemed to be doing an excellent job of injecting logic and signal so I left it at that.
But I am not convinced you are trying to be persuaded, maybe more enjoying the protracted heated discussion
Adam
ps it only takes a second to trim quotes - the thread'd easier to read if you also would trim!
Instead of dismissing my arguments by framing them as having some sort of agenda, perhaps you'd care to address the myriad issues I, and others btw, have voiced in this thread.
The pages have accumulated precisely because I have not thrown out simple, short ad hominems or logical dismissives as you have described. I've done most of the talking.
I may be wrong about SC's but one thing I hope is that people here are convinced of my sincerity on the issue. I have a real concern about the philosophical direction you're trying to take Bitcoin in and the highly risky economic effects it may have.