Oh great, incendiary loud mouth brg444 back in the mix. Just when I thought we had a proper chance of a decent discussion to get going.
There is no such chance with you in the mix.
You have refused or flat out ignored the most logic counter-arguments to your "concerns" and prefer dancing around spewing the same platitudes. It's like groundhog day with you.
If the best way to deal with a troll is to ignore him, then why don't you leave, especially since I'm the one doing most of the talking around here? Or maybe it's because you find what I have to say not all together unreasonable?
Not quite, your thread is merely just one other source of information and sometimes valuable discussion. I certainly would not qualify your opinion as particularly insightful or worthy of merits. You are anything but "reasonable".
Case in point Adam, in the few last post of his has provided more insights and valuable discussion material than certainly your few last thousands post on here.
Blah, blah, blah.
Not in my opinion. As JR said, there's nothing new in what he said. Just his opinions as to where the project stands, that Bitcoin has a "problem ", and that we should "trust" him to fix it .
And neither you, nor Adam, had provided a good reason add to why we should up end 6 years of a " no trust" system just to let them establish a $21M for profit entity that seeks to leverage core development to change Bitcoin into their vision while profiting. The core devs refusal to step down speaks volumes and I think Reid Hoffman, et al, would never have plunked down that amount of money if they didn't think it would make a difference.