Nobody forced Blockstream into a position where your actions would draw greater scrutiny than other companies - that's a choice you made all on your own.
Asking why companies which did not choose to take the same route aren't subject to the same scrutiny is obfuscation.
Asking why companies which did not choose to take the same route aren't subject to the same scrutiny is obfuscation.
I could persist, and I think you are glossing over questions that could and should be asked of monetas (it is also some kind of offchain thing and brings its own risks - if people wanted to get concerned about economic models, sucking fees out of bitcoin, encouraging lower security transactions - they could call OpenTransactions a kind of sidechain and with full justification make all the same observations that you just saw on this thread), but I think I made my point - there are hard questions that could and should be asked to companies and individuals proposing changes or architectures/trust-models for handling bitcoin.
And its better to be open, clear and non-confrontational in your responses - people have a right to ask. I think I handled it more openly and gracefully than you did. So there
Adam
ps the correct response is touche not deflection.