But how?

There is a correlation between smart but also unethical but also smart and not wanting, there are different types of smart. So, you need to be "smart to be rich" but you do not need to be "rich to be smart" which means almost all rich people are some sort of smart, not academics smart maybe but still some type of smart, also there are some people who are smart but unethical like Jeff Bezos who doesn't pay a single cent in federal taxes and his workers are paid so little and works so hard that they do not even have a proper bathroom breaks and apply for food stamps that is paid by federal government, so basically amazon costs money to tax payers, just so Jeff Bezos gets richer.

But there are people who found some cancer treatment and got rich, maybe not Jeff Bezos rich but still rich, those deserved it and they are ethical as well and also smart. Basically rich people are always some type of smart, even if not academic type of smart it would still be smart.

Stedsm,

This cannot be a "review" campaign.

You must pay a definite momentary benefit for the reviews hence what you will be crediting people do not need to be the actual money (it can be a play-money). For the reviews you must pay a definite reward as you enroll people based on forum rank and not just in random.

Just my opinion; people who prefer enjoying new sites and not minding their time/efforts for reviewing may not bother this.

May be one or two such candidates; because if I am capable of getting 50 merits in 120 days then I might have been into a long term campaign and may not look for this kind of one-off camp.

What about if the people who decide to join tomorrow or day after tomorrow?

---

No big deal here. No personal thing to a manager who already proved their efficiency; if you assume that I sound like that then I am sorry. I just tried to head up into a situation where I have come across many times. (In recent times, HHampuz's one camp faced similar situation and then they decided to accept lower ranks as well).

No offence; I  just got a suggestion for filling up more slots still within your rule of 5 posts per day.

You may convert the campaign into pay per post type by setting minimum posts required for getting eligible for payment into 20 or 25 posts.

This way late joiners will write only 5 posts per day and will do the needed job of promoting 'DeFi For You' into nook and corner of this wonderful community.

There will be some of them who will be afraid to buy because of the things he has been saying, and there will also be some of them that are curious and would like to try it out. It’s just like among my friends, when I talk about Bitcoin  there are some of them who would be saying bad about it, saying things like – Bitcoin is volatile and all that, but after they have watched it for years now and seen how it has been growing they are now curious and now they want to be part of it.

This will be the same thing with his fans, most of them would have possibly all the bad that has been said about Bitcoin and how it has still succeeded and going strong, and they will now be developing interest.

You are right but this thread was created by him so I guess he has all the right to reply on it when he feels someone has made a reply and he should answer back or share his opinion.

Charts don't pay out that is right but they pay out more often than the random prediction and if we don't go by charts and market news then we are simply gambling in the name of trading so I guess while charts are no as effective as they are in stock market but yeah it is better to use them still.

Yeah you are right. For marketing purposes they are advertising with catchy words like big profits through bot trading but practically only up to the level of profits what manual trading is making alone possible with bots and if we run bots all 24 hours then we can make significant profits with respect to more trading hours.

Good luck mate!

1. You need to provide your Duelbits user ID along with your entry (as per OP).
2. You may need to provide direct link for your image (just a suggestion).

For example, if I wear a signature of a gambling house, do I need to talk in terms of supporting them while I compose posts?

How about campaign managers' and campaign owners' stand on this?

You should not be proud of that for giving them free promotions.

If I remember correctly, Hhampuz themselves will not entourage that as they have once mentioned about not promoting anything for free of cost. It means it will be always a good practice to remove the signature/avatar once the contract expires.

I don’t really know about that, but which wallet are you using? Because the last time I did a transaction of over $200, which is more than the $100 threshold of yours, I didn’t pay up to the $5 you mentioned not to talk of the $8 for the sending fees.

The only problem I have had is with the waiting time, but with some of the wallets I have, like Blockchain and BitPay, I am able to spend unconfirmed funds (for my BitPay wallet I had to go to the settings and activate it, while for Blockchain the funds appear immediately and I am able to spend them.).

This is not true. Bitcoin has so many and very strong use cases. it is all just matter of mass adoption. if Bitcoin get accepted widely by nations and govt. and gets to use in daily life then you can see how many benefits are there in using bitcoin.
and that mass adoption I am talking about is happening. Bitcoin already attracted millions of people. and recently paypal announced adding Bitcoin in its platform which means Bitcoin will gain another 26+ million potential users and that is just the beginning.

So don't think bitcoin as just a form of gambling it is a lot more than that. it cannot replace oil, gold or any other assets but it has it's on place and importance.

I strongly agree that we must not give the control over our own funds to anyone but there are various API integration I believe such that one can trade with your account but still cannot withdraw or manage that section at all. So, they can only make orders for buy and sell and the worst they can do is get you in loss but cannot scam.

That was indeed a great match because after the 3rd set tie breaker I felt like Thiem has done it and Diego is done for this match. I mean he broke the Thiem's serve and got into the Tie-breaker and I felt like yeah now Diego should have the momentum but he somehow lost the breaker and I even closed the stream since I was only watching for fun and had no bet on the game itself.

But this guy is something else now I see the score and he won, just amazing because against a player who grinds as much as Thiem it must have been a great mentality to win from behind in sets and losing a tie-breaker is never a good feeling specially on clay where you have to play extra shots and get exhausted.

Is the government not doing anything there to provide sufficient food to the citizens? If not then surely you must have the worst government really. I mean people should be dying of hunger in such times because there should be enough food and groceries supplied to the people.

I feel the countries hit hardest by this pandemic are those where the government is the weakest and the economic status was dire already before the pandemic.

Hi,

Are you keen on being part of upcoming industry shaking altcoin?

Are you having sufficient knowledge on launching and managing altcoins?

Are you good in basics of economics and blockchain concepts?

We look for serious people on partnership/remuneration based.

Please send me PM with telegram/skype/discord handles.

While freelancing platforms might have reduced profits for some designers or coders because they take fees but at the other hand they actually opened a massive market for idle freelancers and companies that required workers might be overpaying because they did not had any platform to hire workers.

I understand that they are charging fees but they are not forcing you to join them or work through them but if you do, they have all the right to take their fees because they are providing their valuable platform to both seller and the buy and they also need to pay their team who work behind the smooth working platform and also maintenance fees,etc.

I understand the frustration from some users but more good is being created by them as compared to the minor harm to some developers.

I have planned to launch my own altcoins with few innovative feature but I could not find blockchain based developers locally.

If you have worked with any dev who is professional and highly skilled and experienced on altcoin creation and all other related things then kindly suggest me them.

Please how did you get to know that Satoshi started cryptocurrency to avoid meltdown? Did you see him write that? So how did you get to know of what you’re just saying now? The only explanation that I know he gave about cryptocurrency is that it is only meant for transactions (peer-to-peer transactions and there is no other explanation, he never talked about investment… if he did, then I don’t know, maybe cause I haven’t taken my time to research about it. Then to answer your main question, I don’t think Bitcoin can be affected by the economy, Bitcoin is completely independent and no matter what happens… it is still going to remain what it is and there is not going to be any changes.