Ninjastic
Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 516 results by 101111
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: #NO2X - JOIN THE WAR!
by
101111
on 05/10/2017, 02:12:28 UTC
Quote from: illyiller on October 04, 2017, 11:13:47 PM
The silent majority is silent. Stop trying to speak for us, NO2X. Your Twitter brigade doesn't represent millions of Bitcoin users.

That's hypocritical, you also can't speak for the silent majority, and you're not silent. Not only that, casting the opinions of twitter users as 'brigading' is disingenuous, an outright lie unless you have any proof.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: FAIRLAY - SPORTS BETTING for experts - highest liquidity, provably best odds
by
101111
on 14/03/2017, 04:51:32 UTC
$100 fees - that's IF no consensus is reached. You have taken it out of context. Did you even listen to the discussion?
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: [BitFunder] Moving Forward/Resolution Process
by
101111
on 31/01/2015, 02:14:57 UTC
Is he still alive?
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It
by
101111
on 22/12/2014, 14:42:45 UTC
Ok, 'far superior' was stretching it a bit. Let's see how the S5s actually perform seeing as they haven't shipped yet.
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It
by
101111
on 22/12/2014, 13:36:58 UTC
So Dogie is now employed by Bitmain and is quick to spruik them vs prismas https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=902269.msg9914111#msg9914111 which are clearly a far superior product. One of the few credible voices gone; at least he was open about it.
Post
Topic
Board Press
Re: [2014-12-21] The Conversation: 2014 was a bad for BTC, 2015 not likely better
by
101111
on 22/12/2014, 12:55:26 UTC
The Conversation? Reads more like tabloid fluff, certainly not up to their normal standards. Possibly it (The Conversation) was the worst performing intellectual asset of 2014, and 2015 not likely better.
Post
Topic
Board Press
[2014-12-21] Time.com: Big Idea 2015: The Coming Micropayment Disruption
by
101111
on 22/12/2014, 10:00:45 UTC
http://time.com/3636720/2015-micropayment-disruption/

edit: if it sounds familiar... "This Influencer post originally appeared on LinkedIn."
Post
Topic
Board Press
[2014-12-5] Australia should go for broke on Bitcoin
by
101111
on 05/12/2014, 01:23:15 UTC
http://www.businessspectator.com.au/article/2014/12/5/technology/australia-should-go-broke-bitcoin?utm_source=exact&utm_medium=email&utm_content=1031059&utm_campaign=kgb&modapt=

"it was instead Australia's banks who were responsible for holding Bitcoin back, describing them as "acting like a bunch of ostriches" with their heads in the sand."
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: John Mauldin on Bitcoin
by
101111
on 01/12/2014, 07:58:59 UTC
Quote from: Biodom on December 01, 2014, 07:53:53 AM
Quote from: 101111 on December 01, 2014, 07:43:59 AM
He doesn't say 'replaced',

"I think we evolve to Bitcoin 2.0 or 3.0, using the same blockchain technology, but with a way to make the
new currency a truly stable medium of information that can be easily exchanged for goods and
services."

and "But will it be Bitcoin? My best guess is that it will not be Bitcoin as currently constructed but rather an evolved version."


Isn't that the idea - as with most software - to evolve?

Well, to a degree, if such software aspires to be at least a currency. Dollar is still a dollar, there was no dollar 2.0 or 3.0
I guess what I am getting at is bitcoin has to stay bitcoin with 21 mil units just as a 1930 dollar bill could be redeemed now for goods and services.
If bitcoin changes, evolves, mutates, sublimates into something else entirely-most will feel betrayed IF "old bitcoin" would not be accepted at par (or better) with bitcoin 2.0 or 3.0.
Yes I agree with that, mostly, despite Dollar 2014 being worth only about 3% of Dollar 1914.


Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: John Mauldin on Bitcoin
by
101111
on 01/12/2014, 07:54:25 UTC
Quote from: cbeast on December 01, 2014, 07:41:51 AM
Anyone 5 years behind the curve in their own professed field of expertise needs not be taken seriously. Would you go to a doctor that hasn't read any new medical information in 5 years?

In fact I smell a sales pitch for a "sure thing" investment if I click on anything in his blog. It's looks like one of the oldest scams about making money by writing books about making money.
He's not professing to be a Bitcoin expert, just "offer a few of my own thoughts on the relationships among gold, fiat money,
Bitcoin, and financial transactions".

Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: John Mauldin on Bitcoin
by
101111
on 01/12/2014, 07:43:59 UTC
He doesn't say 'replaced',

"I think we evolve to Bitcoin 2.0 or 3.0, using the same blockchain technology, but with a way to make the
new currency a truly stable medium of information that can be easily exchanged for goods and
services."

and "But will it be Bitcoin? My best guess is that it will not be Bitcoin as currently constructed but rather an evolved version."


Isn't that the idea - as with most software - to evolve?
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
John Mauldin on Bitcoin
by
101111
on 01/12/2014, 07:26:32 UTC
At last John has written about Bitcoin.

https://www.mauldineconomics.com/frontlinethoughts/is-bitcoin-the-future

It's quite lengthy so I won't post it here, but very well worth reading.

Post
Topic
Board Press
[2014-11-27] Gold is ‘effectively shiny Bitcoin’: Citigroup’s Buiter
by
101111
on 27/11/2014, 16:14:55 UTC
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/gold-is-effectively-shiny-bitcoin-citigroups-buiter-2014-11-27?link=MW_home_latest_news

in edit: A very unflattering, one dimensional comparison.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Very interesting points on Bitcoin by a great Economist
by
101111
on 27/11/2014, 01:44:20 UTC
Quote from: boumalo on November 27, 2014, 01:13:13 AM
Schiff thinks the Bitcoin price decrease proves Bitcoin is doomed but the graph of the market cap of Bitcoin is not scarier than most nasdaq stocks : https://blockchain.info/charts/market-cap

Schiff is right on qe and the fed and he warned of the real-estate bubble when everyone was oblivious to it.

Rubbish.

Do a quick google.

eg "By 2004, concerns about a housing bubble were pervasive throughout the popular media."  http://www.forbes.com/2008/12/31/housing-bubble-crash-oped-cx_bb_0102bartlett.html


Post
Topic
Board Press
[2014-11-25] The Guardian: Welcoming the Bitcoin challenge: the case for opening
by
101111
on 26/11/2014, 02:14:56 UTC
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/nov/26/welcoming-the-bitcoin-challenge-the-case-for-opening-up-currency-markets-to-competition

"There is no reason why more competition and choice in money markets can’t deliver the same kind of benefits that more competition and choice have delivered in product markets: greater stability, greater choice and ultimately better outcomes."

edit: add quote
Post
Topic
Board Press
[2014-11-25] GST on bitcoin would be “monumentally stupid”
by
101111
on 25/11/2014, 04:09:25 UTC
GST on bitcoin would be “monumentally stupid” says digital currency expert

http://www.smartcompany.com.au/finance/investment/44746-gst-on-bitcoin-would-be-monumentally-stupid-says-digital-currency-expert.html#
Post
Topic
Board Press
Re: [2014-11-14] CD: Bitcoin No Solution for Today's Market
by
101111
on 17/11/2014, 06:40:40 UTC
Western Union CIO: Bitcoin automobiles no solution; we have horses, they can go anywhere.
Post
Topic
Board Press
Re: [2014-11-13] Video Bloomb: Bloomberg Panel Discussion on Outlook for Bitcoin
by
101111
on 13/11/2014, 16:18:34 UTC
tl;dr please?
Post
Topic
Board Press
[2014-11-14] CNBC Forget currency, bitcoin's tech is the revolution
by
101111
on 13/11/2014, 16:10:16 UTC
http://www.cnbc.com/id/102178309
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Shall we make this a thing guys? a "Bitillionaire'
by
101111
on 10/11/2014, 12:34:31 UTC
Bitillionaire? Sure sounds better than Microbitillionnaire!