Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 52 results by 1337toolz
I was thinking to make a rig of those, any of you have used latest 11.5 from Claymore ? I saw a jump on 550 hashrate, and I was wondering if the same things happened with tH 560
I'm still using v.10.5.I've tried v.11.2 but there was no ETH hashrate increase. Also I doubt about v.11.x stability after I've read some forum posts.
did anyone have bios for RX-560D4SFG5
RX 560 4gb D5 1196M CORE DP HDMI
For Eth
I'd create one for you if you provide the original bios.RX 560 4gb D5 1196M CORE DP HDMI
For Eth
What core freq do you use? I have problems with stability with the card until I lower core to 1100 and undervolt it to 775, after that I've got memory to 2100 (with PBE timings, not Branko)
Usually I start testing using the following conditions:CV: 800mV
PL: +25
CC: 1150MHz
MC: 1950MHz
"with PBE timings" - PBE timings usually work fine for me as well
now you got me curious enough to go buy one, but lucky as I am,
I'll probably get one with 1500MHz Hynix
It's always a lottery. Unfortunately I'll probably get one with 1500MHz Hynix
It was just 1 day lag between 2 orders in my case. And I've got GPUs with different mem chips.
"-80" means the highest possible data rate in the series - 8.0 Gb/s.
So GPUs with such memory should give a good hash rate. Seems, we just need a strap with proper timings.
So GPUs with such memory should give a good hash rate. Seems, we just need a strap with proper timings.
@1377tools Do you use whole bios provided by Branko or straps only?
I apply the same (or almost the same) mods to original GPU's bios.Interesting...sounds like problem I have with Hynix version of my Gigabytes...it actually uses 1500MHz
memory and OCs about 300MHz lower than micron...maybe they started using same trick with micron too
I could try other straps if you have some.memory and OCs about 300MHz lower than micron...maybe they started using same trick with micron too
It would be great if you could take picture of memory chips, so we can check what frequency
they're rated for...from BIOS, I only see that they use mt51j256m32 revision B, with slightly different
timings than revision A
MSI RX560 AERO ITX 4G OC - 7WB77 D9VVR
Gigabyte GV-RX560OC-4GD - 7SA47 D9TRZ
That's the answer why the msi aero and gigabyte gaming behaves in a similar way - they use the same memory chip.
D9VVR is MT51J256M32HF-80:B
Interesting...sounds like problem I have with Hynix version of my Gigabytes...it actually uses 1500MHz
memory and OCs about 300MHz lower than micron...maybe they started using same trick with micron too
I could try other straps if you have some.memory and OCs about 300MHz lower than micron...maybe they started using same trick with micron too
Hi Branko,
I've tested the strap on 2 GPUs:
1. Gigabyte GV-RX560OC-4GD - ETH 15.6MHz@2125 and hang@2150
2. MSI RX560 AERO ITX 4G OC - works unstable even at 1950MHz
I've just tested one more GPU:I've tested the strap on 2 GPUs:
1. Gigabyte GV-RX560OC-4GD - ETH 15.6MHz@2125 and hang@2150
2. MSI RX560 AERO ITX 4G OC - works unstable even at 1950MHz
Adapter 2 (BN=04, DN=00, FN=00, PCIID=00001002, SSID=000022FF)
Asic Family : Polaris11
Flash Type : GD25Q41B (512 KB)
Product Name is : GV-RX560GAMING OC-4GD/FW0/06F3
Bios Config File: RX560GO4.FW0
Bios P/N : P/N Not Available
Bios Version : 015.050.002.001.000000
Bios Date is : 01/07/18 02:14
The result is the same as for the msi aero - works unstable even at 1950MHz
I've just tried the latest drivers (18.3.2) from amd...
Ok, it was just a waste of time. Completely.
1. AB doesn't work properly with these drivers
2. The 'Compute Workloads' can't be switched on for some of my GPUs for some reason
3. The 'Radeon Settings' software is f'cking sloooooow and extremely f'cking inconvenient (I was very close to smashing my laptop, waiting while the next UI screen is being opened after a button is clicked)
4. I've not managed to get acceptable hashrates
5. Rolled back to the blockchain edition drivers
Branko, what exact version of the drivers do you use, please?
Ok, it was just a waste of time. Completely.
1. AB doesn't work properly with these drivers
2. The 'Compute Workloads' can't be switched on for some of my GPUs for some reason
3. The 'Radeon Settings' software is f'cking sloooooow and extremely f'cking inconvenient (I was very close to smashing my laptop, waiting while the next UI screen is being opened after a button is clicked)
4. I've not managed to get acceptable hashrates
5. Rolled back to the blockchain edition drivers
original old blockchain driveers are known to draw more power
Seems, power consumption is approximately the same for the both.Branko, what exact version of the drivers do you use, please?
Maybe you didn't do this?
Of course I did However hashrate was ~1Mh/s worse than with the drivers I use.Anyway, seems, it's time to try once again.
Btw, what exact version are you using? The most recent one (18.3.2) or...?
Btw, if by "blockchain drivers" you mean ones from 23. august 2017, try latest adrenaline instead,
as original old blockchain driveers are known to draw more power
I meant those drivers (Radeon Software Crimson ReLive Edition Beta for Blockchain Compute Driver Version 17.30.1029 (Windows Driver Store Version 22.19.659.0).as original old blockchain driveers are known to draw more power
I have tried the Adrenalin Edition drivers a couple of times. But each time I got lower hashrate than with the blockchain drivers. Perhaps, I should try once again. Thank you for the hint.
That one is rev.2
Why do you think so? Just because of there is no additional power connector?Seems, the both revisions have no the connector:
rev.1.0:
https://static.gigabyte.com/Product/3/6333/2017062918234898_m.png
rev.2.0:
https://static.gigabyte.com/Product/3/6478/2017110611543396_m.png
Branko, any idea, why power consumption of my GPU is higher than yours one, please?
thanks
thanks
Thats pretty crazy, I can't think about any other reason but bug in HWinfo, or
AMD driver giving wrong info in either your or my case
Interesting to note that your card has both bigger average fan speed, and whole
7C bigger average temperature...is it GB rx560 Rev1 with 2 fans and additional
PCI-E power conenctor?
It's GV-RX560OC-4GD GPU (not sure is that rev1 or rev2, with 1 fan and no additional power connector):
Adapter 1 (BN=03, DN=00, FN=00, PCIID=00001002, SSID=0000230A)
Asic Family : Polaris11
Flash Type : GD25Q41B (512 KB)
Product Name is : GV-RX560OC-4GD/F60/0696
Bios Config File: RX560O4.F60
Bios P/N : P/N Not Available
Bios Version : 015.050.002.001.000000
Bios Date is : 10/31/17 03:57
Also, I'm using the latest version of HWinfo and blockchain edition of the amd drivers.
The fan speed is bigger because I use AB software fan control with custom fan speed curve.
PS. Today I'm going to test the strap on another GV-RX560 edition GPU. Will let you know the results later.
https://i.imgur.com/1fPCk9h.png
Branko, any idea, why power consumption of my GPU is higher than yours one, please?
thanks
Gigabyte micron gaming 4gb oc version 1
Hi Branko. Could you share good timings for such cards, please? Ok. Could you share your mod, please?
Sorry it took me a bit....had a lot going on this week
https://db.tt/Io6PeRfic4
I zipped up all of the modded ones.
That's really strange. You should get at least 1Mh/s extra instead.
Could you compare timings of the 2 mods, please? Are the timings same? If not, try to move your timings to the mod I've made.
looking at it in PBE the timing straps are exactly the same as when I used One Click...should I be looking for something different?Could you compare timings of the 2 mods, please? Are the timings same? If not, try to move your timings to the mod I've made.