Search content
Sort by
Showing 6 of 6 results by 1951pn
I will trade your newbie ignorance and insults for FACTS
I really like that nice BitcoinSV logo in your screenshot. I pity you because your stupidity transcends you, my god it's overwhelming. You seem to be so condescending that you don't want to make the effort to understand how bitcoin technically works. However, you may soon discover that there is a difference between production nodes and peeping nodes which do nothing but read. It will depend on how many serviceable neurons you have left. If the effort seems difficult, believe me, it is not impossible. Try again, Read the technical facts.Guys I'm a bit concerned about how centralised bsv is getting,just look at how the node count has declined to 18, at this rate I calculate bsv will be compromised within 1 year . DUMP THIS SHITCOIN NOW BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE.
You have been warned!
https://i.imgur.com/btQngc0.jpeg
Muppet, you make my day with your threats of price manipulation. You are dumping BSV, good for you. You have been warned!
https://i.imgur.com/btQngc0.jpeg
Note that BTC has... 12 nodes, owned by 6 groups with the majority in 2 countries and 3 nodes.
You have been warned. BTC is good for trash. DYOR. Thanks for playing.
Quote
The only way to scale to the globe, even for CBDC's, is via SPV. It was designed that way from the start. And Craig/nChain have SPV patented. No one else is even close. #dealwithit 😎 #BSV is #Bitcoin
SPV > https://craigwright.net/bitcoin-white-paper.pdf
https://twitter.com/JoelDalais/status/1527261171128143873
SPV > https://craigwright.net/bitcoin-white-paper.pdf
https://twitter.com/JoelDalais/status/1527261171128143873
Quote
The minminingtxfee setting will affect which transactions are present in the mempool of your node. We suggest you set it to the same value as miners are configuring.
I think Taal and Gorillapool are both setting this value to "0.0000005", which is equivalent to 50 sats/kb.
I think Taal and Gorillapool are both setting this value to "0.0000005", which is equivalent to 50 sats/kb.
https://coingeek.com/bitcoin-sv-node-software-updates-to-version-1-0-11-heres-what-you-need-to-know/
https://www.theregister.com/2022/01/19/craig_wright_bitcoin_sv_high_court_sueball/
"I own that $4.5bn of digi-dosh so rewrite your blockchain and give it to me, Craig Wright tells Bitcoin SV devs
Oh look, another High Court sueball over cryptocurrencies
Gareth Corfield
Wed 19 Jan 2022 // 11:01 UTC
A man who claims he's the creator of Bitcoin says his private keys to £14m of Bitcoin SV were deleted by hackers in 2020 – and now he's suing developers to forcibly give him access to internet coins he "owns but cannot access."
Craig Wright (yes, him again) is suing 15 people and one Swiss company in the hope of forcing them to "re-write or amend the underlying software code" so Wright can get his hands on a large amount of Bitcoin SV.*
The High Court of England and Wales recently ordered Wright to pay the court security for costs in case he loses, with the resulting judgment shedding light on yet more English litigation involving Wright and Bitcoin."
Hi everyone, this is great! We'll see what happens. Have you seen that BSV has surpassed and continues to surpass other blockchains in terms of daily TX. Personally I find it exciting! BSV is a blockchain that can accommodate a lot of people besides data transactions and other nft, micro payment, video games. I agree that this is great! But I don't understand why the specialized media (except for Coingeek) don't talk about the exploits of BitcoinSV?"I own that $4.5bn of digi-dosh so rewrite your blockchain and give it to me, Craig Wright tells Bitcoin SV devs
Oh look, another High Court sueball over cryptocurrencies
Gareth Corfield
Wed 19 Jan 2022 // 11:01 UTC
A man who claims he's the creator of Bitcoin says his private keys to £14m of Bitcoin SV were deleted by hackers in 2020 – and now he's suing developers to forcibly give him access to internet coins he "owns but cannot access."
Craig Wright (yes, him again) is suing 15 people and one Swiss company in the hope of forcing them to "re-write or amend the underlying software code" so Wright can get his hands on a large amount of Bitcoin SV.*
The High Court of England and Wales recently ordered Wright to pay the court security for costs in case he loses, with the resulting judgment shedding light on yet more English litigation involving Wright and Bitcoin."
so interesting