There have not been any changes that should require an upgrade since that was built.

There are a few things that can cause that message, including crosstalk with bitcoin. Do you run bitcoin as well?

Can you do something like

memorycoind getinfo | pastebinit
memorycoind getpeerinfo | pastebinit
tail -100 ~/.memorycoin/debug.log | pastebinit


or dpaste or whatever pastebin  util you use.

Then send us the urls you pasted that to?

We will be updating the linux builds later this week, but that should not be a factor for that message.

BTW, can you please use the thread http://21stcenturymoneytalk.org/index.php/topic,23.0.html for support on our builds.  We are much less likely to miss the post and it keeps this thread uncluttered with things that are probably of interest only to those using our builds.

Haha, yeah, I agree.  The data file is awkward, especially since the code does not search the path, so you need to cd first to be in the directory with the file before you run it.   Not sure how it would work with the mac app packaging either.   I am hoping it is a temporary kludge and not a permanent fixture.

IRC was removed from bitcoin, for a number of good reasons.  Since this was forked from bitcoin, it no longer has irc for seeding either.  However we did add in dnsseed support to our builds for memorycoin.  So I am curious why you say they are failing?   They should be working. It would be nice to get some more seeds to add to it though. So a report on why it is failing would be good to fix things if needed.

We would be more than willing to create a section for freicoin on our forum ( http://21stcenturymoneytalk.org ) if some of the freicoin folks would use it.

I actually think the voting pool had the opposite of the effect that was intended.  It took away a number of the mid tier holders votes from the existing grants,  and let the hoarders stay in longer then they otherwise would have.  Will be interesting to see if that changes anytime soon or not.   

I think it is way too soon to call it dead, as the dynamics are still in flux.

Oh, we are voting.   It just seems our votes are currently not mattering.

Also, looks like we have started to lose our grant.  I guess the coin users don't like voting to support the coin development.

I think it was the multicoin client that paved the way for ixcoin. I need to find some time to dig
up the threads later to confirm the timeline.



Not sure it did work, but that was the idea of it.

It was part of the multicoin coins, along with weeds.   


No, it does not sound like it from that.  Later though they added dual hashes from what I read, to try and become more 51% resistant.   Will try and see if I can find the info again later when I have more time.   

I think I heard of RU having it first.

It does not go to the foundation.  There is not a foundation even.  It goes out as share rewards to people that complete bounties.


Surprised this made the list for that.


The I2P support started as a patch for bitcoin.



There is also memorycoin, which has a vote/grant system.

There was Beer which was the first attempt  to fix the value of a blockchain currency to a commodity.



SC still processes transactions and is traded as well on mcxnow.

I am having an issue with block 2479 when I compile with gcc 4.2.   On the same system (BSD) I get an instant
crash when I compile with gcc 4.8 or clang 3.3.

What compiler or build are you using?  What OS?

Someone made a grant for that:   http://21stcenturymoneytalk.org/index.php/topic,40.0.html

As I understand it,   FT started with the  Memory Coin Foundation Address.  Later, when most of the grants were going to unknowns, he also added addresses to eventually be donated to the EFF and AI.
He also created a grant for himself.    As far as I know, only the MCF and his grant ever got
funded out of these?

The 21st Century grant is ours, for running the Block Viewer,  providing a forum section, maintaining
a seed node and helping with the code, such as keeping it buildable on other systems then windows.

Then  I think there are some grants for a giveaway and profit share grant.   

So far I think a good percentage of the grants have gone to unknowns still.

I have gone back to a version that used BDB, as leveldb was just too flakey.

Do the issues go away when you limit the mining to a single core/thread?

I would say the fact gets ignored because it is false.

Don't be a liar.

Really?  So just how do you calculate market cap then?

That is being done I think.   Fuzzy Pool

As I understand it the btc part all works, but the mm needs to hit some blocks so it can be tested and fixed up.

No, only the mining hashing cycles are common.  You have other cpu cycles used by the daemon still being used.  Now if you are just mining, and using a pool, those costs are born by the pool, so you will not see them directly as a pool user.

To be fair, while it is low, it is not zero.  Running it takes up cpu and memory and network resources etc.


Edit:

Ah, just noted that you said opportunity cost not cost... ok...   that would be zero when mined with bitcoin, and other mm coins, and be part of the cost of switching from them.
 

We will be putting one up for IXC soon.  Fuzzy Pool will be sponsoring it.

If you know of anyone willing to sponsor the others we can probably put something up for them as well.