Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 275 results by 247casino
www.1player.com
www.ibitcoincasino.org
Similar to SwC
Vault storage of btc
Casino chips for play
12 hour or less withdrawls
Both use Poker Mavens the script SwC uses
SwC has lots of micro betting action
iBitcoin Casino has low betting action 1/2 blinds
1Player has live concierge casino hosts to arrange 100/200 blinds games all day long
I have no interest in iBitcoin Casino
I have interest in 1 Player
I don't need to vote, just letting you know you need to add two more to your list, it's a good idea but make sure voters have actually played in the casinos
www.ibitcoincasino.org
Similar to SwC
Vault storage of btc
Casino chips for play
12 hour or less withdrawls
Both use Poker Mavens the script SwC uses
SwC has lots of micro betting action
iBitcoin Casino has low betting action 1/2 blinds
1Player has live concierge casino hosts to arrange 100/200 blinds games all day long
I have no interest in iBitcoin Casino
I have interest in 1 Player
I don't need to vote, just letting you know you need to add two more to your list, it's a good idea but make sure voters have actually played in the casinos
ibitcoincasino.org - another pos website? 
make thousands more of them and probably someone will finally understand how "amazing" your poker is with non-flat logo
make thousands more of them and probably someone will finally understand how "amazing" your poker is with non-flat logoDude you own a .info, you can't even afford a real domain with a real TLD, do you even know what a TLD is?
Get a life, I'm one of the investors in www.1player.com
www.iBitcoinCasino.org is run by friends of mine and they used the same designers I use, now go play with your 2 dollar .info
Get a real domain loser.
You can't even afford your own server
http://whois.domaintools.com/bitcoincasino.info
Now if you had some dough I could SUE you for being a LIAR
Registrant Name:Tim Heath
Registrant Organization:Heathmont OU
Registrant Street: Lootsa 8
Registrant City:Tallinn
Registrant State/Province:Tallinn
Registrant Postal Code:10123
Registrant Country:EE
Registrant Phone:+372.56711221
www.1player.com has their own server, their own IP, their own SSL, their own license, their own operators/investors
I OWN 1 www.1Player.com since I'm one of the investors
www.ibitcoincasino.org has their own server, their own IP, their own SSL, their ow license and their own operators/investors
So what we know each other, I know a few dozen mega-millionaires and we all golf together, belong to the same clubs, party at the same clubs and we play poker at MY CASINO and 10 of us do the deep water 20 Million Poker tournament each year that poker pros can't even get into, ask a few, they've heard of the whale deep water game, all whales, and if you aren't in the group of 36 guys that rotate chairs you can't get into it.
Not all the guys play in it, but a nice amount do.
Now shut up you liar
Re: iBitcoin Casino Live Bitcoin Poker 1 BTC = 9.6 BTC Payout
Please work on your design...
Says the fortune crack shill to earn his 1 post today to make 8 bucks this week
haha
None of those names involved in 1 Player, you are a liar.
Leave our thread alone.
You tell them
LOL
Primes are useful because multiplication is computationaly easy. Factorization is not. Are you suggesting 30 mod prime makes factorization easy?
Yep, you divide by 30 and the remainder tells you what spiral it is on
so now you only have to check 1/30th of the field
both primes and composites over 5 are all 30n+PorNP
so no matter the number, you can find it's distribution channel and all these seed keys are on the same spirals
so they're relational
you got nothing but cooked seed keys and the recipe is 30n+PorNP
P = the 8 adoni spiral primes
NP = the other 22 numbers
So 30Mod cracks both Prime based crypto and ECC that doesn't have to use primes
the seed keys are all related to each other by being 30n+Y there the y is known to the seed key maker
Y can be one of the 8 adoni primes or one of the 22 non primes
is anyone starting to understand this?
every number above 5 both prime and non prime fits 30 mod and as long as the seed keys have the same Y as what you add to it
the n doesn't matter
it's the Y channel that links the numbers that no one knows about
primedice is my favorite to me honest 
that's not a logo
a crown gif with white text
flat
ugly
haha
amazing the tasted in here
Take another hit of your crack pipe that's the ugliest logo combo I've seen
amazing how retarded some people are
wow
Delusional? I'm bumping you because I'm enjoying the time you are surviving here to see your site or your clone one fail miserably.
Keep bumbin
Look how great the logo for www.1Player.com looks
http://1player.com/images/logoscomp2.jpg
It's still more artistic than yours.
Keep bumping me up
Show everyone you are delusional
Ahahah
*Shao Khan voice* Don't make me laugh, is that your best?
Seriously, you are telling me that an elite casino like yours needs to be paid by the same developers clone website that does lower blinds to survive uh?
Neither I want the free monkey players, but I love to do freerolls, so I can smash some fresh meat.
*Shao Khan voice* Don't make me laugh, is that your best?
Seriously, you are telling me that an elite casino like yours needs to be paid by the same developers clone website that does lower blinds to survive uh?
Neither I want the free monkey players, but I love to do freerolls, so I can smash some fresh meat.
They're friends now go back to your little hole and pretend you have traffic
When you want to get crushed put 10K in www.1player.com we have a HU table with 100/200 blinds and it's NLTH
When I take your 10K you can saw HEEEEHAWWW
Like the donk you are
Dude, if you can't take honest criticism don't ask for it. Now I bet you're probably going to rage at me isn't it?
But anyway, the logo looks a bit outdated, I suggest a flat minimalist logo with a different colour scheme. If you did make it with paint, try recreate it a bit better using GIMP, a free alternative to photoshop. It can read photoshop files too.
But anyway, the logo looks a bit outdated, I suggest a flat minimalist logo with a different colour scheme. If you did make it with paint, try recreate it a bit better using GIMP, a free alternative to photoshop. It can read photoshop files too.
Fortune CRACK crack head
Wrong colors?
Then the top casinos in the world are all wrong
SHUT UP IDIOT
http://1player.com/images/logoscomp2.jpg
Man, then tell me where it redirects the button free play, cause you have one, Sure I'm lying uh.
Dude there is NO FREE GAMES on 1 Player
Now look at the front door, a bunch of PAID LINKS from a company that PAYS ME TO LINK TO THEM, they run free games
I do not want free morons on my site, so we push FREE MORONS to other sites
If I wasn't paid for that link I would send them to a page with my hairy ass against the camera saying KISS MY ASS
NOTHING IN LIFE IS FREE
Fuck idiots that want free shit
Get a JOB
How's the action? Tables, stakes, bots, colluders?
If you want high stakes we have it, 100/200 blinds and way higher, no bots and some big wallets.
The bigger games 100/200 blinds and up have a real casino host set them up, you say time and they find players for this type of action all day.
If you want 10/20 games, good luck, the casino has these tables, but the hosts do nothing to promote them, so they get some action by newbs and donks that wonder in and put up 100 bucks to join an exclusive casino, then they see no action since the action is all through the hosts and starts at 100/200 blinds and 10K buy ins.
If you want minor games from 1/2 blinds to 10/20 try www.iBitcoinCasino.org , that casino is going after 1/2 to 10/20 blinds, I know the operators and we have the same design team
We (1 Player www.1player.com) go after 100/200 blinds and up
If you want penny games try SWC
I'm not sure if SWC has bots, I know we don't have them and I was told iBitcoin Casino doesn't have bots
This is conspiracy theory bullshit written by somebody with no clue in mathematics, number theory, primality testing, cryptography and so on.
Yes, the prime numbers distribution is not random and Ulam spirals are real but they are nothing more than a curious pattern with no practical applications. There is no magic formula that will yield simultaneously a) only primes, b) all primes and c) different primes every time without some kind of brute force testing.
There are many polynomials that yield primes more often than usual - but they yield composites too and the primes they yield are not unique. One of the best known ones was invented by Euler: k ^ 2 + k + 17; it yields 16 different primes as k takes values from 0 to 15 inclusive. An even better one is 36 * k ^ 2 - 810 * k + 2763; it yields 45 different primes when k takes values from 0 to 44 inclusive. The existence of such polynomials is the reason why primes form "patterns" when put in a grid on a plane - because in analytical geometry, lines and curves on the plane are expressed with polynomials.
If you relax the requirement to get only primes, it is trivial to come up with a polynomial that would yield all possible primes. For instance 6 * k +/- 1 yields every prime greater than 3.
The sieve of Eratosthenes is a rather inefficient algorithm for primality testing and prime number generation; it is useless for anything but relatively small numbers and it does use brute force. It is just better than trial division - but only clueless idiots use trial division for primality testing. From what I can see in the PyPrimes code, Croft spirals (or Adoni spirals or whatever) is just a variant of the formula I've given above, only it sieves out the multiples of 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19 and 29, instead of just 2 and 3 as the formula above does. It might be marginally faster than Eratosthenes's sieve for small numbers but is utterly useless for sufficiently large primes.
The author obviously is too clueless to understand the much more complex algorithms like Miller-Rabin, or NFS.
That said, how exactly the NIST elliptic curves are picked is a concern and I personally don't trust Elliptic Curve Encryption - but that's only because I don't have a sufficiently good understanding of it (while I do understand and prefer RSA encryption). But nobody forces you to use the NIST curves. You can easily pick different ones and still use EC-based cryptography.
And, of course, all this has nothing to do with Bitcoin or with the cryptographic hash functions in general.
Yes, the prime numbers distribution is not random and Ulam spirals are real but they are nothing more than a curious pattern with no practical applications. There is no magic formula that will yield simultaneously a) only primes, b) all primes and c) different primes every time without some kind of brute force testing.
There are many polynomials that yield primes more often than usual - but they yield composites too and the primes they yield are not unique. One of the best known ones was invented by Euler: k ^ 2 + k + 17; it yields 16 different primes as k takes values from 0 to 15 inclusive. An even better one is 36 * k ^ 2 - 810 * k + 2763; it yields 45 different primes when k takes values from 0 to 44 inclusive. The existence of such polynomials is the reason why primes form "patterns" when put in a grid on a plane - because in analytical geometry, lines and curves on the plane are expressed with polynomials.
If you relax the requirement to get only primes, it is trivial to come up with a polynomial that would yield all possible primes. For instance 6 * k +/- 1 yields every prime greater than 3.
The sieve of Eratosthenes is a rather inefficient algorithm for primality testing and prime number generation; it is useless for anything but relatively small numbers and it does use brute force. It is just better than trial division - but only clueless idiots use trial division for primality testing. From what I can see in the PyPrimes code, Croft spirals (or Adoni spirals or whatever) is just a variant of the formula I've given above, only it sieves out the multiples of 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19 and 29, instead of just 2 and 3 as the formula above does. It might be marginally faster than Eratosthenes's sieve for small numbers but is utterly useless for sufficiently large primes.
The author obviously is too clueless to understand the much more complex algorithms like Miller-Rabin, or NFS.
That said, how exactly the NIST elliptic curves are picked is a concern and I personally don't trust Elliptic Curve Encryption - but that's only because I don't have a sufficiently good understanding of it (while I do understand and prefer RSA encryption). But nobody forces you to use the NIST curves. You can easily pick different ones and still use EC-based cryptography.
And, of course, all this has nothing to do with Bitcoin or with the cryptographic hash functions in general.
...as per opening statement?
I'm not a mathematician, I'm a geologist. Just posted this simply as topical subject matter, that's what these forums are for, right?
Been a supporter of Blockchain technology for almost 2 years, and fortunately may have more BTC than most. With that, there are also many other investors that visit these forums. Personally I do fear at times for the security of private keys and just wanted to know if there was any mathematical premise for PNC, as to decryption?
Apologies, as it appears to have summoned emotive negativity for some of you folk.
I'm just after an explanation that confirms that this is impossible and why.
Dude you're talking to NSA shills here, you know that right.
haha
NSA created bitcoin and it is back doored
ECC is backed doored by using seed keys created on the same prime spiral that was exposed in 1995 by Dr. Sol Adoni
So listen to the NSA bots here, they give you bogus info, the seeds are corrupt as the Snowden docs revealed
CORRUPT KEYS destroyed ECC
Bitcoin uses ECC
Any ECC can be back doored due to understanding how the seed keys lie on the same spiral, so that relationship is what they use to create bad seed keys
DUH
This is conspiracy theory bullshit written by somebody with no clue in mathematics, number theory, primality testing, cryptography and so on.
Yes, the prime numbers distribution is not random and Ulam spirals are real but they are nothing more than a curious pattern with no practical applications. There is no magic formula that will yield simultaneously a) only primes, b) all primes and c) different primes every time without some kind of brute force testing.
There are many polynomials that yield primes more often than usual - but they yield composites too and the primes they yield are not unique. One of the best known ones was invented by Euler: k ^ 2 + k + 17; it yields 16 different primes as k takes values from 0 to 15 inclusive. An even better one is 36 * k ^ 2 - 810 * k + 2763; it yields 45 different primes when k takes values from 0 to 44 inclusive. The existence of such polynomials is the reason why primes form "patterns" when put in a grid on a plane - because in analytical geometry, lines and curves on the plane are expressed with polynomials.
If you relax the requirement to get only primes, it is trivial to come up with a polynomial that would yield all possible primes. For instance 6 * k +/- 1 yields every prime greater than 3.
The sieve of Eratosthenes is a rather inefficient algorithm for primality testing and prime number generation; it is useless for anything but relatively small numbers and it does use brute force. It is just better than trial division - but only clueless idiots use trial division for primality testing. From what I can see in the PyPrimes code, Croft spirals (or Adoni spirals or whatever) is just a variant of the formula I've given above, only it sieves out the multiples of 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19 and 29, instead of just 2 and 3 as the formula above does. It might be marginally faster than Eratosthenes's sieve for small numbers but is utterly useless for sufficiently large primes.
The author obviously is too clueless to understand the much more complex algorithms like Miller-Rabin, or NFS.
That said, how exactly the NIST elliptic curves are picked is a concern and I personally don't trust Elliptic Curve Encryption - but that's only because I don't have a sufficiently good understanding of it (while I do understand and prefer RSA encryption). But nobody forces you to use the NIST curves. You can easily pick different ones and still use EC-based cryptography.
And, of course, all this has nothing to do with Bitcoin or with the cryptographic hash functions in general.
Yes, the prime numbers distribution is not random and Ulam spirals are real but they are nothing more than a curious pattern with no practical applications. There is no magic formula that will yield simultaneously a) only primes, b) all primes and c) different primes every time without some kind of brute force testing.
There are many polynomials that yield primes more often than usual - but they yield composites too and the primes they yield are not unique. One of the best known ones was invented by Euler: k ^ 2 + k + 17; it yields 16 different primes as k takes values from 0 to 15 inclusive. An even better one is 36 * k ^ 2 - 810 * k + 2763; it yields 45 different primes when k takes values from 0 to 44 inclusive. The existence of such polynomials is the reason why primes form "patterns" when put in a grid on a plane - because in analytical geometry, lines and curves on the plane are expressed with polynomials.
If you relax the requirement to get only primes, it is trivial to come up with a polynomial that would yield all possible primes. For instance 6 * k +/- 1 yields every prime greater than 3.
The sieve of Eratosthenes is a rather inefficient algorithm for primality testing and prime number generation; it is useless for anything but relatively small numbers and it does use brute force. It is just better than trial division - but only clueless idiots use trial division for primality testing. From what I can see in the PyPrimes code, Croft spirals (or Adoni spirals or whatever) is just a variant of the formula I've given above, only it sieves out the multiples of 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19 and 29, instead of just 2 and 3 as the formula above does. It might be marginally faster than Eratosthenes's sieve for small numbers but is utterly useless for sufficiently large primes.
The author obviously is too clueless to understand the much more complex algorithms like Miller-Rabin, or NFS.
That said, how exactly the NIST elliptic curves are picked is a concern and I personally don't trust Elliptic Curve Encryption - but that's only because I don't have a sufficiently good understanding of it (while I do understand and prefer RSA encryption). But nobody forces you to use the NIST curves. You can easily pick different ones and still use EC-based cryptography.
And, of course, all this has nothing to do with Bitcoin or with the cryptographic hash functions in general.
You're clueless
Python Primes tested all the prime algorithm the fastest was 30 Mod Prime Algorithm or Prime Spirals all the modern stuff did terrible, the only thing even close to prime spirals was the ancient greek sieve, wheels and other algo's did 100 primes a second and ancient sieve 20k and the adoni spirals 30K
So 50% improvement on finding primes.
Now the big thing is that the 8 prime channels or spirals are what the NSA creates bad seed keys with, it's the fact the seeds are on the same spiral that allow them to be back doored.
Now shut up about stuff you are clueless on
hey you got some btc, let's play one on one in my casino
www.1Player.com
I'm not Sol Adoni and I own a casino and I will destroy you one on one if you dare to enter my casino
LOL
This is the quite the casino you have. I cilcked around and I was amazed
at the lack of any gaming functionality. (you seem to have failed to even install
an SSL certificate)
Amazing Sol! I mean, um, 247casino... who is not Sol and is a completely
different person and has an amazing casino.
wow!
I'm not Sol Adoni and the casino I own with some partners has SSL you lying scum
https://1player.com
See liar
YOU LIE
It has the top poker room for bitcoin in the world, huge games that morons can't play in
Re: iBitcoin Casino Live Bitcoin Poker 1 BTC = 9.6 BTC Payout
You know, I've seen other rude owners that made very Horrific websites, and more over, they pretended to have paid the software/design of the wesbite etc thousand of dollars.
In reality even I can open an high roll tournament, raise the cash rake to a nice % so I get my decent profits without doing nothing, and then, be like, oh, there is been a mistake in the offline wallet the computer got a virus, the hard disk is been erased, they robbed our case...
We bitcoiners know exactly the flow of where the money exactly goes, AND we saw that kind of software in almost every new poker room that comes out DAILY.
It maybe the best software around for bitcoin, but that means it's also affordable for almost anyone.
I saw people using bots as fake players to just attract the newcomers.
What if I have against myself a bot of the owner that is setted to play like a regular Pro of WSOP for example? Where is the challenge to have a bot that maybe it has the 100K dollars as BI, but acts so aggressively that steals the BI until someone decides to call and maybe win, what happens in that case?
Lets say I go allin with 2 or more opponents, and I win 300K dollars, then I decide to cashout, will I have issues to cash them out?
How fast they are? most of poker room up here does istant withdrawals/approvals ones but still takes not more than 30 minutes.
Like someone said, sign an address containing some cash to show us you casino can afford to pay the customers.
In reality even I can open an high roll tournament, raise the cash rake to a nice % so I get my decent profits without doing nothing, and then, be like, oh, there is been a mistake in the offline wallet the computer got a virus, the hard disk is been erased, they robbed our case...
We bitcoiners know exactly the flow of where the money exactly goes, AND we saw that kind of software in almost every new poker room that comes out DAILY.
It maybe the best software around for bitcoin, but that means it's also affordable for almost anyone.
I saw people using bots as fake players to just attract the newcomers.
What if I have against myself a bot of the owner that is setted to play like a regular Pro of WSOP for example? Where is the challenge to have a bot that maybe it has the 100K dollars as BI, but acts so aggressively that steals the BI until someone decides to call and maybe win, what happens in that case?
Lets say I go allin with 2 or more opponents, and I win 300K dollars, then I decide to cashout, will I have issues to cash them out?
How fast they are? most of poker room up here does istant withdrawals/approvals ones but still takes not more than 30 minutes.
Like someone said, sign an address containing some cash to show us you casino can afford to pay the customers.
Leave them alone, 10btc is peanuts, I'll vouch for them.
They don't keep btc online, read their site, they're similar to swc, they keep coin in vaults they pay accounts that leave in 12 or so hours. That's the norm and you know nothing about online poker rooms.
10BTC is not a big tournament, it's peanuts.
Re: iBitcoin Casino Live Bitcoin Poker and Sports Book Play Today
blah blah blah
Quick question, how do you know who SOLLOG is and why are you defending him?
30 minutes ago I had no idea this bat shit crazy nut job, who claims to be god, existed.
It's been a fun ride, you provide many lolz John, but I'm out.
Ass wipe, I've known Dr. Sol Adoni for years, we golf together, he's really good at golf.
No one calls him Sollog, that's a pen name for his psychic stuff.
Dr. Sol Adoni, a rich dude, very very rich.
I can beat him at poker most of the time, but he kills everyone at golf.
Just don't book his sports bets, he will kill you. 17 Super Bowls in a row he hit.
www.psychicbets.com he sold it to the guys that own the casino in this thread, he retired from Super Bowl picks a few years ago. Made a ton off of him.
Lots of people know him. No big deal.