Add this node

Thank you on new pool!

yes...  https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/c469a7f879de14c966397db9dd6eb0c8a0a6b31cc92d7215a0a9576e6526d952/analysis/1479410312

Topic updated!

reserved

Many of us, I'm sure, share the hope that you will develop your current GUIminer to facilitate the mining of NTC, Netcoin.

This was all comedy right? Like ... The Onion or something ... RIGHT! ? 

Leads for the capacitor are exposed, not good ... a hair floating in the air, or some other thing could bridge it and schwammy! Most run open boxes, so that the cap leads are exposed is not good. It might be effective for OC power spikes for the card attached, but generally, I just think having a Capacitor with exposed leads for generally open box systems is not good. Lots of open boxers are learning that spiders, and baby spiders, etc ... love the warmth of open boxes as they attract insects as well. One invisible thread of spider web, and zappage. I like the concept, but not the implementation.

I would also like to be considered for Alpha or Beta testing and would participate in discussion, provide screenshot feedback and perhaps make a screencast-o-matic or two as I have a subscription and I am familiar with making desktop tutorial in SOM.

3. Moving Average Convergence-Divergence

This, if only for litecoin, would be a huge leap forward in trading tools. Much like bitcoin.clarkmoody.

I visualize a slider GUI tool for those who like to place their trades by hand with a frequency of trades perhaps 1 every 1-5 days, not a daytrader.

To have some granularity, at any level, for filtering the orderbook would be, for all Crypto trading a giant leap forward. To create algorithms for automated trading based upon orderbook filtering might be a noble goal, but to gain feedback from the use of a broader, more basic orderbook filtering tool might provide data for building an orderbook filtering logic bot. If one can determine what the trader who executes on a longer timescale is looking for in the orderbook, then the development of algorithms to construct an automated bot which derives trading data from the orderbook might be more tangible for coding something more intense for automation.

Looks good, this was much, much needed ... and will contribute to the muchness of NTC! 

Some days before the bitcoin 2013 conference we saw Litecoin stabilize neatly around the $3 mark into a channel with a suppressed trading range, very narrow. And we saw this happen on the way up from the last correction to $2.5 levels where very large buy and sell walls were placed on the orderbook at btc-e which effectively obscured and made the bid/ask ratio metric unuseable unless filtered with a dynamic view. These large, moving buy and sell walls were articulated such that the trading ranges were constricted to channels and moved up to consolidate trading ranges sideways at the $3 levels.

One of the tools I find sorely lacking in trading Crypto is an interface to filter out the largest buy walls, or see only the buys/sells that are for example in an 8LTC to 45LTC range, and to examine other ranges of orders on the book might give one a perspective on a more accurate market depth, and market depths in different channels of the orderbook.

When we attempt to use the "short orderbook" on btc-e itself to gauge market depth, volume and movements, often we find the buy and sell walls heavily peppered with automated, high frequency, bot spam orders, or micro-orders. Filtering this out, and removing the largest buy/sell walls, would provide a much more accurate picture of buy/sell interests on the "long orderbook".

When performing statistical analysis, one of the first steps in finding a mean, or an average of course is to throw out the lows and the highs and average the middle values, and then of course there are many other metrics which can be derived from the orderbook. Of all of the tools in Crypto trading I find to be the least utilized it is the orderbook.

ra2VVgF9LbHua54zz33TGzz4LUNDchVa2P

NetworkCoin would be a really, really nice name for the coin, as good as, or better in many ways. Netcoin is still good, yes, that's awesome, but to match the coin to the name of the domain is very important.

In the real, brick and mortar world, if I said, "I'll give you dollarines for that", well sure, that's real close ... but marketing and branding really demand that if you CAN match the name of your DOMAIN to your, (product-coin), it's a very good thing. To compete in the SEO namespace of "network" would be very nice as well, a doable challenge.

Many people, when trading real value, and taking real risk, having to make a decision IF "netcoin"="networkcoin"="NTC" ... well why take that risk ... at all?

Nice spreadsheet, thanks for this.

May I suggest a WDC/LTC ratio, suggested by throwing out low and high, and averaging the meaty middle, :-)

I am assisting a Worldcoin miner and broker with some issues they are having with their wallet, the wallet is out of sync, and is having difficulty syncing. A message is displayed at the very bottom of the wallet client that says: "WARNING: Displayed transactions may not be correct! You may need to upgrade, or other nodes may need to upgrade". This user has been trading and transferring from the wallet with some success, but is concerned, can anybody shed some light on this "WARNING" message?

===============================

WE WILL try to apply this solution or gather information from this solution that will assist, thank you.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=204894.msg2177180#msg2177180

I'm up and running, mining at wdc.dontmine.me I hope this helps.

That's ... innovation, tricky, the human condition is a big factor here, and I like that this is being boldly addressed.

The .conf file is needed to seed the wallet with IP addresses, sure, after it seeds you can delete the .conf file, or leave it there. At least that's how it worked for me.