The  new  version  is  finally  ready.  You  can  download  PhoenixMiner  5.8a  from  here:

PhoenixMiner_5.8a_Windows.zip Github
PhoenixMiner_5.8a_Linux.tar.gz Github


Changes in version 5.8a :

• Full LHR disable mode -lhrdis <n>  1 - yes (default), 0 - no
• Added lock core clock
• Fixed an issue causing crashing with some RTX 3060/3080/3090 cards
• Implemented new "turbo" kernels (-clkernel 3) for AMD Polaris cards that can work with the current DAG sizes over 4 GB. Note that -clkernel 3 uses double the VRAM and will
  provide slightly faster hashrate with slightly higher power consumption. You can use the -rvram command-line parameter to specify how much VRAM to be left unused
• Increased the maximum supported DAG epoch to 600 (i.e. until about Sep 2023)
• Implemented full hardware control for AMD RX6900/6800/6700 cards under Linux. Note that with these cards under Linux you need to specify relative core voltage: e.g. -
  cclock -50 will set the core voltage to be 50 mV under the default value
• Added ROCr kernels for Vega, Radeon VII and Navi cards. With these kernels you will be able to run these cards with Linux drivers 20.45 and later but the performance will
  be lower than with the older PAL drivers and kernels. We recommend using AMD Linux driver 20.30 for all cards except RX6900/6800/6700
• Fixed an issue causing crashing with some RX6900/6800/6700 cards under Linux (there is no need to run these cards with -clkernel 0 anymore)
• Added support for AMD Windows drivers up to 21.8.1. Note that Radeon VII cards will not work with drivers 21.6.1 or higher - you need to use older drivers for proper
  operation of these cards
• Added support for AMD Linux drivers up to 21.20 (use older drivers for Vega or Radeon VII cards as they will not work with 21.20). Note that the latest 21.30 drivers are
  not supported (and the initial testing shows that even the older Polars cards are not working properly with them, so avoid 21.30 for now)
• Numerous other fixes and small improvements

Please let us know if you have any problems or questions related to PhoenixMiner 5.8a

up

up

up

up

up

Purchased 18,000 Coins, make me rich.

Selling the domain Dapps.biz

0.2 BTC or PM offers.

It took me 3 seconds to find: https://domainnamewire.com/2012/04/16/google-files-complaint-against-domain-registered-1999/

This is a business on a confusingly similar domain with millions collected from investors, the business has been branding itself as Boogle and recently acquired Boogle.com. If y lawsuit of a few million, (maybe up to the hundreds) and a UDRP for the domain dosnt count as an ass-whooping, then i dont know what does. The question remains the same, why does google not do it (its not like they are not aware of the project). Instead they choose not to comment.

And another one, again, they are out for 3years, law clearly dosnt permit what they are doing. No where in the world, let alone SG. The question is, if google isnt in, how are they not getting sued.

Well, again, that dosnt drill to the core, thats just what they offer or want to do. What me and a couple of other potential investors are wondering about is how they can operate with that company name/domain being a search engine and not get an asswhooping from google. Thats all.

Intention: See if anyone knows anything.

Google would have... why?

The main question that no one can answer is, how does google not sue them?
Whats clear as daylight is that one cant just create a car company and call it Fesla, or a socialnetwork and call it Bacebook, so, if, Google did not ok a search engine called Boogle (I mean come on, infringement couldnt be any clearer) , then how are they 3 years in, millions in funding, offices in SG, etc etc, without getting sued.
 
That, is the question.

So, the general line of thought seems to be, They just changed the name to profit of the brand?

The thing is, they are around since 2017, and have offices up, logos, meetings, and all that... As someone pointed out, there is Toogle Zoogle etc etc, from what i have seen thou, the moment someone tries to launch a search engine on a name like that they would get sued up and down by Google.

Any TM lawyers around? How can a company set up a search engine with such a similar name with offical offices in SG, and NOT get sued? This a trick id like to know about.

They recently switched from Boogle.io to the mainpage Boogle.com, from what i can see claiming to have simply purchased Boogle.com

The thing is, i cant imagine Google not winning if they sued Boogle, and unless they are partnerd i cant see how they wouldnt do that.
Thats like if i opened a company called Chevolet, as my car brand. Or a social network called Lacebook, thats simply not gonna happen.

Reason for making the thread (to be clear) is because my attempts at asking for info where simply ignored . (+ i think if someone just creates a 7bn market and dosnt announce on here, that people dshould know).

Of course we have to wait, just making the thread to see if someone out there happens to know more. + I like theory talk especially when im bored...

I find it extremly unlikely that a company like Google would let someone use Boogle as their search engine brand, if they are not a sub-co or affiliated (Partnered).

Its not, i expect they will do their own announcement.

Also, the rest of yur response has nothing to do with the questions asked.

I am not with Boogle, nor do i have any affiliation, this thread only serves as information.

I saw the Boogle project a while ago and immidiatly noticed the similarity to, of course Google.

Was wondering how they could legally put out a search engine with such a similar Name.

Does anyone know if or if not they are affiliated with Google, how they were able to acquire Boogle.com? (Recently) And if they are not affiliated, how are they legally able to do it?

I did try reaching out but no information was provided by either side...not to mention, they currently have a $7bn market (for their entire coin supply).

Found their pitch and wp so on here https://dmh.co/index.php/9-featured/26-welcome
They also seem to have a youtube/twitter/fb none of which is very informative, Not what a 7Bn project ussually looks like.

up

Some nice names SOLD.

And the others may aswell sell soon, PM your offer today!

closed.