Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 63 results by 7isce
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
7isce
on 23/11/2023, 15:52:14 UTC
[TARGET: 1] [SPEED: 1632701.66 MKey/s] [TOTAL: 48,937,041,920] [00:05:18]
search 48,937,041,920 in 318 seconds

48,937,041,920 / 318
So the real speed is 16,215,056 ~= 16 MKey/s
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: pool.vkbit.com - the ultimate Bitcoin solo mining pool | 0.5% fee after 50TH/s
by
7isce
on 07/10/2023, 02:38:30 UTC
Hi,

I rent rigs(more than one) from MRR and I use this pool as main pool but the pool suddenly cut connections with rigs!?(pool down, pool update...)
This happen twice in less than 24 hours!?

Thanks
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
7isce
on 29/09/2023, 05:22:13 UTC
Seems that sha256 and rmd160 is a joke for most users here, all those partial address are not useful at all.

I agree with that. Some people think the processes inside sha256 and rmd160 are based on scientific steps but they are wrong.
It's based on what we called "BLACK MAGIC", You do the steps in certain way and you get your target output(Here is UNIQUENESS) without any scientific explanation on why you do it in this order or why you use this operation instead of that operation...

BLACK MAGIC != SCIENCE
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
7isce
on 23/09/2023, 05:17:08 UTC
You could just use it as

Code:
file1 = open('file1.txt', 'r')
for line in file1.read().splitlines():
    compressed_keys.append(bytes.fromhex(line))
file1.close()

file2 = open('file2.txt', 'r')
for line in file2.read().splitlines()::
    compressed_keys.append(bytes.fromhex(line))
file2.close()

Good Luck with your studies  Wink
Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Re: Pollard's kangaroo ECDLP solver
by
7isce
on 29/08/2023, 02:15:34 UTC
Yes there is, already taken care of, if you are the first one spending from that address, nobody else even you can not double spend it, RBF is turned off for all puzzle keys.
Where you get this info, If attacker send new transaction with 3BTC as fees then all pools will be so happy to replace the founder(who solve the puzzle) transaction that in best case have fraction of 1BTC as fees.
Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Re: Pollard's kangaroo ECDLP solver
by
7isce
on 29/08/2023, 02:10:12 UTC
Yes there is, already taken care of, if you are the first one spending from that address, nobody else even you can not double spend it, RBF is turned off for all puzzle keys.
Where you get this info, If attacker send new transaction with 3BTC as fees then all pools will be so happy to replace the founder(who solve the puzzle) transaction which in best case have fraction of 1BTC as fees.
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: pool.vkbit.com - solo mining pool [stats @ vkbit.com]
by
7isce
on 12/08/2023, 02:06:46 UTC
I check your coinbase transaction which is pay direct to my address. That's good.

Just for Diff is there way to set manually?

Thanks
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
7isce
on 07/08/2023, 15:09:49 UTC
The method is good as idea but you will lose significant amount of speed because you need to do scalar multiplication for each key, the secp256k1 sequential tricks will not work here.

So the new question will be arises, Is it worth to lose that much of speed to avoid that amount of keys?
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
7isce
on 05/08/2023, 09:06:42 UTC

python for cpu.
now i have 50.000 key per second on cpu
i finished a first version for gpu and i get 250.000 keys per second for now
Don't waste your time, Keyhunt(CPU) can start with 1,000,000 key/s and you can get 27,000,000 on high end CPU.
BitCrack and KeyHuntCuda can get 1,000,000,000  key/s with mid range GPU.

Just pickup one of them, or you can change the code as you wash(its open source at the end)
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 2% fee solo mining 276 blocks solved!
by
7isce
on 16/07/2023, 10:32:26 UTC

I'm only running one Compac F its about 17Watts at the socket and its being run by a Raspberry PI Zero 2W, which is about 3 watts at the socket so in total approx 20Watts. As a lottery miner thats great, it blends into the background a costs litterally nothing to run, especially given the house is running mostly on solar & battery.

But, yes a real miner you're looking at more than 3000Watts at the socket!
Great choose, I was plan to buy it or rent high rigs for few months(which I choose).
And it look like I will need up having nothing so take good care of your rigs  Smiley
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 2% fee solo mining 276 blocks solved!
by
7isce
on 16/07/2023, 08:57:20 UTC
Always encouraging to wake up and find your miner has churned out its biggest share so far.

"hashrate1m": "283G",
 "hashrate5m": "296G",
 "hashrate1hr": "291G",
 "hashrate1d": "296G",
 "hashrate7d": "295G",
 "lastshare": 1689495159,
 "workers": 1,
 "shares": 415751586,
"bestshare": 2479049083.761295,
"bestever": 2479049083,
 "authorised": 1685417900.....

only 22,000 times more and its a win!  Cheesy
I was getting 24T but it's never go up after that so I give up. And now I come back with mindset to ignore the bestever.
All we need is share the greater than bitcoin diff. That's it.


Good luck for everyone.
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 2% fee solo mining 276 blocks solved!
by
7isce
on 28/06/2023, 12:14:46 UTC
Hi,
I just want to be sure, Is the Native SegWit multi signatures (like https://solo.ckpool.org/users/bc1qruzlf3pszgl5dgsy5n99afpjmt93r4sx64q99vvslg5ywnnrht4s3gkkm7 ) full supported or I should use single Native SegWit?

Thanks
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
7isce
on 02/05/2023, 08:55:45 UTC
Bro thanks for replying, can you pl tell me How to run it in cmd with my particular range & pub key, plus can it take multiple pubkeys at a time, all within same range of 2^80??
No here you must use one pubkey but in https://github.com/JeanLucPons/Kangaroo use can use CPU or GPU or both with multiple pubkeys.

The script is easy to run from cmd.
You should first install python package (For here https://www.python.org/downloads/ )
Then use this format in cmd(HEX = Hexadecimal)
python kangaroo.py -p PUBLICK_KEY_HEX -keyspace START_RANGE_HEX:END_RANGE_HEX

For example(search in range 80):
python kangaroo.py -p 0352b1af31d67e6a83ec7931c148f56b0755ce40c836f20c6fe2b6da612c89cf3e -keyspace 80000000000000000000:100000000000000000000
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
7isce
on 02/05/2023, 05:16:20 UTC
Is there any python script for BSGS or Kangaroo algorithm to search with bit range of 2^80?Huh??

This one is not working, I tested it. https://github.com/Telariust/pollard-kangaroo/blob/master/pollard-kangaroo.py
Check this https://github.com/iceland2k14/kangaroo
Post
Topic
Board Project Development
Re: Keyhunt - development requests - bug reports
by
7isce
on 28/04/2023, 07:25:03 UTC
Maybe albert0bsd refer to bug of using -m address (single, NOT -m addresses ) which will miss the key.
Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Re: Some doubts about rmd160 and address for vanity search
by
7isce
on 23/04/2023, 04:26:42 UTC

Well yes it is some offtopic but i going to reply to you here

Okay, I didn't get your idea at first glance, but after rereading it for the second time, I now understand what you're trying to do.

There are many substractions in BSGS not only ONE example:

Current Implementation:
Code:
Key 99
known range 75-100
Baby step 5  = { 0,1,2,3,4}
Giant step 5 = {0,5,10,25,20}

First subtraction to move key to the BSGS range
99(key) - 75(Base range) = 24

New Target Key 24

Giant step 0
24 - 0 = 24 is on Baby Table? NO

Giant step 1
24 - 5 = 19 is on Baby Table? NO

Giant step 2
24 - 10 = 14 is on Baby Table? NO

Giant step 3
24 - 15 = 9 is on Baby Table? NO

Giant step 4
24 - 20 = 4 is on Baby Table? YES (HIT)

Calcualted KEY is Giant Step 4 plus Baby step 4 PLUS [b]Base range[/b], this is 20 + 4 + 75 = 99

Your proposed Implementation:
Code:
Key 99
known range 75-100
Baby step 5  = {75,76,77,78,79}
Giant step 5 = {0,5,10,25,20}
Target Key 99

Giant step 0
99 - 0 = 99 is on Baby Table? NO

Giant step 1
99 - 5 = 94 is on Baby Table? NO

Giant step 2
99 - 10 = 89 is on Baby Table? NO

Giant step 3
99 - 15 = 84 is on Baby Table? NO

Giant step 4
99 - 20 = 79 is on Baby Table? YES (HIT)

Calcualted KEY is the HIT key
I don't know if that is your idea or not, please correctme if im wrong But in this example We only avoid one substraction, all the Giant Step subtractions remain... There will be some more varians of this (only make stride
 with the Giant step, etc...) but almost all keep the Giant Step subtractions.

BTW another important thing to Generate a lis from 1 to X is that we can use that SAME list for ANOTHER targets BUt if you do the list from Target to ( Target + X), then that list only is going to be useful againts that specific target.

Mora about BSGS: https://andrea.corbellini.name/2015/06/08/elliptic-curve-cryptography-breaking-security-and-a-comparison-with-rsa/

You are right, I was wrong. I just think of it in my head and I'm aware of trade off, creating new list with every target but when you put it with example I see it clearly useless.

There something I found odd that could be useful for this topic, I test both KeyHunt-Cuda & VanitySearch, there result is too big different in the speed.
KeyHunt-Cuda(I test on around 20M keys, so with one key it should be 2200-2400Mk/s)
[00:00:04] [CPU+GPU: 2151.32 Mk/s] [GPU: 2151.32 Mk/s] [C: 0.000000 %] [R: 0] [T: 8,606,711,808 (34 bit)] [F: 0]

VanitySearch
[5258.87 Mkey/s][GPU 5258.87 Mkey/s][Total 2^36.89][Prob 0.0%][50% in 42.0213y][Found 0]

I know VanitySearch is just check first few bits of the address but that could be useful trade off for example checking 70% of the address to increase the speed of keyhunt and if there are a hit then do 100% checking.
Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Re: Some doubts about rmd160 and address for vanity search
by
7isce
on 22/04/2023, 18:20:46 UTC
This could be out of topic but I have suggestion for BSGS.
Instead of create list from 1bit -> Xbit, create it from target -> +Xbit (or reverse) so you can just directly check the hash table without doing any subtract to the private key.
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 2% fee solo mining 273 blocks solved!
by
7isce
on 05/04/2023, 10:02:20 UTC
If the number of BS shares is not important, why do the numbers need to be stacked up layer by layer?
 Huh
We just want to see how much step is taken before get to THE TOP BEST SHARE.
As you said, it not important but think of it as gamble so its can help us to decide to run again or try something else.

Or it can be as trophy for your try, for example I get 24,621,621,978,697 BS (https://solo.ckpool.org/users/115pH6tHqcKpS7RvyzseW4RQySankBQd89) so when the rig I rent end then I can take break with some dignity Smiley
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
7isce
on 03/04/2023, 04:35:17 UTC
Hi i was testing something with the puzzle and different maths system and i found this key:
https://privatekeys.pw/key/00000044656e697320746573742062696e61727920636f646520776f726b7321

In ASCII is written: Denis test binary code works!

Do anybody know Denis? is he maybe the creater of this puzzle?

What way i have used? i have open the last found BTC Puzzle Link:
https://privatekeys.pw/key/000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001a838b13505b26867

i have copied the binary code and have double it, then the adress in top cames out with the ASCII that looks human created

And i have another Question why everybody think we have only 160 puzzle parts?
https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/addresses/BTC/1Czoy8xtddvcGrEhUUCZDQ9QqdRfKh697F

here we can see that 256 adresses get some of the bitcoins from the same adress means we have 256 parts right?
Your way to get "Denis" is just a luck. If it's really a clue then you should do it with all/most puzzle keys.

Yes the old puzzle is 256 bit but the creator is move the 161-256 bit to 1-160 bit so the amount in 1-160 bit is increase by 10.
Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Re: BitCrack - A tool for brute-forcing private keys
by
7isce
on 06/12/2022, 14:37:05 UTC
Thanks for everybody for explanation.
And any tool to take participate in loterry? I want random bruteforce of all keyspace, at a database of all BTC adresses with balance

I think about Hashcat, but it doesn't take secret exponent, in can bruteforce onli WIFs
Go with Keyhunt if you want use CPU & RAM
https://github.com/albertobsd/keyhunt

And go with KeyHunt-Cuda if you want use Nvidia GPU(Only)
https://github.com/manyunya/KeyHunt-Cuda