Search content
Sort by
Showing 7 of 7 results by Aboveyourass
there are always bag holders and losers like you to buy those "cheap coins" to lose money.
however greater fools are not enough for over price coins so the price goes lower and lower!
however greater fools are not enough for over price coins so the price goes lower and lower!
Yeah, like it is purely visible from 220 to 275 that we are loosing money, and we seem to lose more money tonight, right? Keeping your screen upsidedown much?
There is undeniable buying pressure, a horde of "greater idiots" if u will, and were packed and ready to roll, and dumping ..well..we will dump when u finally decide to buy, and be ultimate trolls :]
cheers
Sure, get ready for the incoming next $97 to $120 to $60 pump and dump scheme
it's good that they bought at 30% higher price, this mean that current value is somehow safe, and the price will rise by 30% before any dump occur, because of that auction
Can you provide us the link to your claim that the bidders bought at 30% higher price ? As far as I concern, it's just a rumour
well yes just a rumor, i read it somewhere in the forum, don't remember know, there was a guy that said it
ok here you go
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=960634.msg10679456#msg10679456
After the previous auctions took place, I've heard the price was actually lower than the market price.
It is bidding after all.. they might have been sold for $100 , otherwise, why would you bid higher then the market price ? (you always have the option to buy off the market..)
The US Marshals are less likely to scam their buyers, by that basis alone it would make sense to pay more.
Don't see how it's relevant, you have plenty of legit exchanges to buy from without paying 30 or even 10% above the market price.
They never payed over the market price imo if anything they paid quite abit under the price or about the same if that was the case that they was willing to pay higher, why would they? I mean they could have just set buy walls and brought what they needed over a week or 2 and paid quite abit less. They paid under market rate and so they should.
I'm also quite confused why would the bidders buy beyond the market price when they could have bought it on much lower rates? I COULDN'T GET THE LOGIC BEHIND IT!
If you are a investor in need of 50.000 btc it will be very hard to buy it from the market or otc.
The main problems are slippage and risks regarding counterparty.
Both of it and more doesnt apply here
no one needs 50,000 BTC, that's why you troll this shit since $6xx but no one bought those 1000k+ " $
Then just sell and forget bitcoin.
But i know u cant. Your addiction and believe in bitcoin is so big that you even have to make atleast 1 new account per day on this forum
Who are all this people selling their bitcoin to if nobody buys?
there are always bag holders and losers like you to buy those "cheap coins" to lose money.
however greater fools are not enough for over price coins so the price goes lower and lower!
it's good that they bought at 30% higher price, this mean that current value is somehow safe, and the price will rise by 30% before any dump occur, because of that auction
Can you provide us the link to your claim that the bidders bought at 30% higher price ? As far as I concern, it's just a rumour
well yes just a rumor, i read it somewhere in the forum, don't remember know, there was a guy that said it
ok here you go
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=960634.msg10679456#msg10679456
After the previous auctions took place, I've heard the price was actually lower than the market price.
It is bidding after all.. they might have been sold for $100 , otherwise, why would you bid higher then the market price ? (you always have the option to buy off the market..)
The US Marshals are less likely to scam their buyers, by that basis alone it would make sense to pay more.
Don't see how it's relevant, you have plenty of legit exchanges to buy from without paying 30 or even 10% above the market price.
They never payed over the market price imo if anything they paid quite abit under the price or about the same if that was the case that they was willing to pay higher, why would they? I mean they could have just set buy walls and brought what they needed over a week or 2 and paid quite abit less. They paid under market rate and so they should.
I'm also quite confused why would the bidders buy beyond the market price when they could have bought it on much lower rates? I COULDN'T GET THE LOGIC BEHIND IT!
If you are a investor in need of 50.000 btc it will be very hard to buy it from the market or otc.
The main problems are slippage and risks regarding counterparty.
Both of it and more doesnt apply here
no one needs 50,000 BTC, that's why you troll this shit since $6xx but no one bought those 1000k+ " $
Re: Is the rumor about the latest 50,000 BTC auction true?
Much more fun to hope that someone buys and offloads steadily, driving the market to ruin in a couple days or weeks. A man can dream, right? Sending them to the eater would be far too kind to the eminently courteous butt-crowd.
To resume the thread we are not sure.
The price is surely going up in the market so it could be true.
pump and dump, it will end up sub $100
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
I think they were bought at ~180-200$, so there will be a dump. Even Draper hinted that he has bought his stash below market, but fools cannot learn that there always was a huge dump after every past auction.
This was the last one I guess...
So I think we should not talk bearish currently as it might surprise everyone out there...
There were 10 blocks of 3,000 bitcoin and 10 blocks of 2,000 bitcoin available for bid. According to Kardashev Capital, whose bid of $221.51 per bitcoin was approximately 17 percent under the market value of the coins as of the close of bidding on Thursday, it did not win any lots. Bloomberg reports that SecondMarket also failed to win any blocks. Brendan OConnor, managing director at New York-based SecondMarket, told Bloomberg that the trading division bid for every block, but was entirely unsuccessful.
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/19512/us-marshals-auction-participant-price-not-significantly-market/
zhoutong's CoinJar - Australia's first VC-backed Bitcoin startup
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=233356.0
zhoutong should be hunted,AGREED?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=233356.0
zhoutong should be hunted,AGREED?
there will be no effect, since they can't dump something purchased for 30% more, unless they are stupid, also i don't think they want to crush the price, therefore in the case of a dump, it will be done outside of the market
You are spreading FUD,bag holder
The rumor was started by a tweet from a twitter account called cryptokees. It's based on nothing but his claim that an "anonymous source" told him before the winners had even been notified. His corresponding bitcointalk account was tweeting for free giveaways of low value plankton shit coins last summer so he can't be rich.
He mentions a coindesk article in his tweet, but there is nothing about 30% above market price in it. I think he just added the coindesk article link to con people into believing it backs his rumor up, which it does not.
Rumor only for now:
https://twitter.com/CryptoKees/status/573577241235423232
No confirmation from any news source yet.
...
Why would anyone trust this?
http://s11.postimg.org/hsub9v603/rumor.png
The Sparood bitcointalk account links to the twitter account that the rumor came from (https://twitter.com/cryptokees)
http://s10.postimg.org/76hlcp9d5/rimor2.png
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=673734.msg7889951#msg7889951
He's not even a senior member.
The link in his tweet unshortens to http://www.coindesk.com/third-usms-bitcoin-auction-bidder-interest/ which makes no mention of 30% above market price.
Everything is based on the word of a full member account who was promoting a shitcoin like plankton.
He mentions a coindesk article in his tweet, but there is nothing about 30% above market price in it. I think he just added the coindesk article link to con people into believing it backs his rumor up, which it does not.
That it was sold 30% (!!!) above market price? Could someone find any news links or any person from say CoinDesk confirm this?
Rumor only for now:
https://twitter.com/CryptoKees/status/573577241235423232
No confirmation from any news source yet.
...
Why would anyone trust this?
http://s11.postimg.org/hsub9v603/rumor.png
The Sparood bitcointalk account links to the twitter account that the rumor came from (https://twitter.com/cryptokees)
http://s10.postimg.org/76hlcp9d5/rimor2.png
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=673734.msg7889951#msg7889951
He's not even a senior member.
The link in his tweet unshortens to http://www.coindesk.com/third-usms-bitcoin-auction-bidder-interest/ which makes no mention of 30% above market price.
Everything is based on the word of a full member account who was promoting a shitcoin like plankton.