Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 22 results by Acalon
I called VERI when it bottomed at $49, said it will never be this cheap again and encouraged people to load up. I predicted the $200 within timeframe and now my $400 mark by end of Dec is being reached compfortably. My prediction for the end of Jan is $1000 ABSOLUTE MINIMUM.
The VeADIR is revolutionary, the utility of each token will be worth multiples of the trading price of Veri (whatever the price of VERI might be). This means that it will become increasingly difficult to buy Veri as there is more value in keeping them, the price offered once VeADIR is released in Jan will increase rapidly. Once people understand what VeADIR does we are talking several 1000% price increase in very short amounts of time.
If you can afford it, now is the time to load up, it's no longer about wether the price is rising too quick but about not getting locked out of the game
The VeADIR is revolutionary, the utility of each token will be worth multiples of the trading price of Veri (whatever the price of VERI might be). This means that it will become increasingly difficult to buy Veri as there is more value in keeping them, the price offered once VeADIR is released in Jan will increase rapidly. Once people understand what VeADIR does we are talking several 1000% price increase in very short amounts of time.
If you can afford it, now is the time to load up, it's no longer about wether the price is rising too quick but about not getting locked out of the game
Did something happened on this token that not everybody was able to get their share of the airdrops when it happened last november? A friend of mine keeps on complaining that he was able to register for the airdrop for this and not a single byte of this token he received.
There was no airdrop for this token, at least I'm pretty sure there wasn't.
Why is this coin constantly referred to as scam. Not trying to FUD just considering investing.
Website is also kinda fishy. Kind of like Bitconnect which we all know deep down that is scam coin although in is valued over 1B$
Website is also kinda fishy. Kind of like Bitconnect which we all know deep down that is scam coin although in is valued over 1B$
You are going to have to spend a bit more time looking into VERI, it's not something you just quickly skim through. There are some novel concepts and a lot of promising work in the pipelines, plenty of info in this thread.
After seeing many good reviews about VERI project, my Wife went and purchased 2 of them, she said to me this is our XMAS present so instead of buying stuff, she bought us 2 VERIS. They are quite expensive in price and she would have loved to have purchased more, but we are in the middle of a house move right now so moving expenses took a bit out of the budget. 
. I hope we can purchase more in the near future if our finances allow but for now we put those two in as part of our pension portfolio fund.
. I hope we can purchase more in the near future if our finances allow but for now we put those two in as part of our pension portfolio fund. Welcome, I believe you have made a good purchase and Veri is on it's way towards $400 over the next 4 weeks or so. Brilliant product with small amount of tradable Veri tokens so should be a good investment
I said there where cheap VERI a few weeks back and it might be the last chance to get them that cheap, nearly double from then value then and apart from the usual dips you get I think we are climbing towards a $200 point within the next 2-4 weeks
The above was from the 16th last month, looks like I'm going to be right on this prediction as well
At the beginning of November, VERI was at the bottom at 50USD but now is over 115USD.
What is the reason behind this price jump? Do you expect it to continue to 200 or 250USD?
What is the reason behind this price jump? Do you expect it to continue to 200 or 250USD?
Yes of course, one of the few coins to just hold onto for the long term. If we are not around $1000 by May then I'd be supprised but we'l see might take a bit longer.
There is plenty of reasons why it's jumped, I see it more as it's rectified after being severely suppressed. Check out Reggie Middleton on Twitter and just scroll down for what has been happening the last month or so
I said there where cheap VERI a few weeks back and it might be the last chance to get them that cheap, nearly double from then value then and apart from the usual dips you get I think we are climbing towards a $200 point within the next 2-4 weeks
Not a fan of Obama but tell me who else in the crypto world is shaking hands with one of the biggest influencers on the planet regarding their project? Hey where have all these guys gone calling VERI a scam coin? I wonder what projects they have been involved in that resulted in them meeting an ex-president, obviously gives a lot credence to Reggies approach to deal brokering.
Do you have pre-ICO?
Too late for that, way past ICO phase but fairly cheap to buy on Ethadelta currently
Man that was foolish, someone accidentally sold 80 Veri for 0.108Eth instead of 0.18Eth, tried snapping them up but someone got in before me. The crazy thing is that they first sold 50 at that price and then again 30 for virtually the same price. Not sure if it was some bizarre atempt at price supression or just plain stupid, I mean once is foolish and unfortunate but doing it twice is either really stupid or suspicious. Anyho', would have liked to get my hands on some of them :/
Wohoo!!! A 1000 Veri going cheap as chips on Ether Delta at the moment, I'm not sure we are going to have them at this price for much longer, possibly might sink to around $40 even which would be good for anyone wanting to stock up but we are nearing the point where Reggies work will start bearing fruight. Just putting it out there, don't care about wether people agree or dissagree so argue with someone elseI was selling my veri in stages, until I saw that Lighthouse Report. Now I will hodl.
It makes no sense that someone puts in the effort of 38 pages of report, registers a domain, pays for twitter promo just to slate something.. i mean its bizarre. There is obviously something good with veri that is either worrying it's competitors, or making someone go to extreme lengths to knock the price down to get in.
Either way im now hodling definitely.
It makes no sense that someone puts in the effort of 38 pages of report, registers a domain, pays for twitter promo just to slate something.. i mean its bizarre. There is obviously something good with veri that is either worrying it's competitors, or making someone go to extreme lengths to knock the price down to get in.
Either way im now hodling definitely.
I kind of agree, been holding over 90% in Veri since ICO (I know should diversify). I keep wanting to diversify and it's wise to do so but a report like that makes me happy that I'm still invested. For a pretty new company that has just raised starting capital I think Veritaseum is moving ahead just dandy.
I have an entire section (#8) of my whitepaper dedicated to analyzing and explaining Byteball.
It is an interesting discovery. It has flaws (and not just related to the consensus algorithm). And my design is not Byteball, but there is one aspect which is similar to one aspect of Byteball, yet my design would not work if it was only Byteball.
One of the main flaws of Byteball that you should be aware of besides the messed up transaction fees and distribution, is that the consensus of the blockchain can become entirely stuck if > 50% of the witnesses collude or stop functioning. Then it requires a (political gridlock potentially) hardfork to unstuck the blockchain. Ditto Tendermint, Casper, and all Byzantine agreement variants (that includes Bitshares/Graphene/Steem's DPoS, yet the whales can vote to unstuck it without a hardfork). Note there is a mechanism for voting in new witnesses, but because it requires a total order so it will in practice never work out because total orders don't exist in nature.
Yeah Byteball has something important in it, but it is not really the solution.
Iota has an entire different consensus than Byteball, and my stance is it won't work without centralized servers. We've already been down that technical debate in the past, so I won't repeat it and get trolled again by Iota shills. Readers can either learn to recognize that I know what I say, or they can suffer the same fate as all the other times I've been doubted.
And no, Bitcoin can't adopt any of these things. Bitcoin isn't ever going to be anything more than what it already is (which is sufficient). Learn to accept that and move on. Lightning Networks is never going to work (decentralized, which is thus the same as saying it is never going to scale up in terms of relevance).
It is an interesting discovery. It has flaws (and not just related to the consensus algorithm). And my design is not Byteball, but there is one aspect which is similar to one aspect of Byteball, yet my design would not work if it was only Byteball.
One of the main flaws of Byteball that you should be aware of besides the messed up transaction fees and distribution, is that the consensus of the blockchain can become entirely stuck if > 50% of the witnesses collude or stop functioning. Then it requires a (political gridlock potentially) hardfork to unstuck the blockchain. Ditto Tendermint, Casper, and all Byzantine agreement variants (that includes Bitshares/Graphene/Steem's DPoS, yet the whales can vote to unstuck it without a hardfork). Note there is a mechanism for voting in new witnesses, but because it requires a total order so it will in practice never work out because total orders don't exist in nature.
Yeah Byteball has something important in it, but it is not really the solution.
Iota has an entire different consensus than Byteball, and my stance is it won't work without centralized servers. We've already been down that technical debate in the past, so I won't repeat it and get trolled again by Iota shills. Readers can either learn to recognize that I know what I say, or they can suffer the same fate as all the other times I've been doubted.
And no, Bitcoin can't adopt any of these things. Bitcoin isn't ever going to be anything more than what it already is (which is sufficient). Learn to accept that and move on. Lightning Networks is never going to work (decentralized, which is thus the same as saying it is never going to scale up in terms of relevance).
Hey, a link to your White Paper by any chance? Sounds interesting
I agree, take the fight somewhere else Dorky and PANCrypto. For the record though, I think Dorky deserves a bit of respect for being a decent critical thinker and suitably sceptical at times (even if it does get a bit acidic ). He initiated getting the FAQ going on the Veritaseum website which is great for newcomers. Anyway, chill guys, better to have civilised discussions and respect opposing views.
). He initiated getting the FAQ going on the Veritaseum website which is great for newcomers. Anyway, chill guys, better to have civilised discussions and respect opposing views.You strike me as an old disgruntled human being. Everything I see from you is pessimistic.
I don't need to be optimistic (nor pessimistic) to anybody.
I don't have such obligation/responsibility.
Dorky is the champ, he adds value. If you want people to be happy clappy then join a church
CryptoPortfolio has lost all credibility on the back of this: https://youtu.be/voWx0F4KXdo
So nobody is allowed to speak the truth anymore? Calling a spade a spade in not allowed?
You guys are funny. You guys are so desperate to make your scamcoin a success so that you can cash out one day, that you don't mind blasting anyone who dares to call you out on what is an obvious scam.
This guy still floating around? Calling out what? I mean if you have something to say then say it, do you think that random trolling equates to a strong analysis of VERI and a thorough description of it's faults + evidence of fraud? I mean I respect that we have people with various levels of intelligence with all sorts of views and opinions but what's your purpose? What are you even doing on here, you add nothing. Spend your time on something you believe in and don't waste your time with us as we are clearly deluded in spending our money on this socalled "scam coin", surely there are more sensible people elsewhere that totally agree with you and would love to join your "Bitching Club"?
Coindesk finally ran an article on us as well.
They didn't run an article on the #1 asset in cryptoland.
They didn't run an article on the best performing asset in cryptoland
They didn't run an article on the precedent setting deal with the Jamacain stock exchange, a first in the crypto universe.
But they did manage to run a hit piece on a hacking with some undfounded negative inferences.
It's pretty shitty that online media has been so obviously biased, ignoring all the achievements yet being happy to report on the hack cast suspicions (which is suspicious of Coindesk in it's self).
I hope the hackers get caught and end up in prison, stealing and also tarnishing Veritaseums reputation should come with concequences. Anyway, I have a feeling Reggie is not someone to mess with which is good if you hold Veri and believe in the project. I think we do carry some responsibility to provide valid critisism when needed but we shouldn't be going as far as slander and promoting conclusions with no validity based on pure speculation.
The hack is dissapointing and i think we deserve a real breakdown (with detail) of what happened exactly. Keeping it vague is not the best policy to engender trust. Personally I have to look at Reggie Middleton as a person to decide how invested I am in this token, Veritaseum is very much operating as a traditional business riding the wave of a new technology as most most great companies have done in the past. Essencially though we as "investors" are more exposed to potential fraud than would be possible under normal circumstances, for this reason the person behind the company needs to be beyond reproach. I have found nothing to indicate that Reggie is an untrustworthy character so far, he is in his 50's and you would expect some history of previous dodgy endevours and scams. There is more to gain by running this company responsibly and building it up than to risk that by some clever inhouse scam, the risks of running a scam and potentially scamming the Jamaican Stock exchange in the process is equivalent to signing your own death warrent in my opinion. Not something I thin reggie would be foolish enough to do. So yea, he has the power to make or break this endevour and in the process make us a fortune or cause to us to loose the same. Do you trust the guy? Personally i see someone who is ultimately quite trustworthy although not perfect, I am going to hold and keep supporting this project online and in person, my bet is on the person though, not purely the product. As any good investor you look at people behind the product to try and judge wether they are invested and capable in bringing the company to fruition.