Ahhh, OK, I see.

Hmmmmm. I had much higher speeds.
See this post of my collected miners and configs: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=514242.msg7982772#msg7982772
My script was 725 kH/s. Other speeds:
4.3 MHs/card       (= x5.9)   for X11,  @1480W for the total 8 cards
3.05 MHs/card     (= x4.2)   for X13,  @1480W for the total 8 cards
2.955 MHs/card   (= x4.1)   for X15,  @1560W for the total 8 cards
413 MHs/card      (= x17.9)   for NIST5,  @1650W for the total 8 cards
6.2 MHs/card      (= x6.2)   for FRESH,  @1350W for the total 8 cards
0.375 kHs(!)/card   (= x0.00051)   for Cryptonote,  @1650W for the total 8 cards

These are my speeds and other relevant data.

4.3 MHs/card       (= x5.9)   for X11,  @1480W for the total 8 cards
3.05 MHs/card     (= x4.2)   for X13,  @1480W for the total 8 cards
2.955 MHs/card   (= x4.1)   for X15,  @1560W for the total 8 cards
413 MHs/card      (= x17.9)   for NIST5,  @1650W for the total 8 cards
6.2 MHs/card      (= x6.2)   for FRESH,  @1350W for the total 8 cards
0.375 kHs(!)/card   (= x0.00051)   for Cryptonote,  @1650W for the total 8 cards

As I have recently shifted my interest from mining (to more working) I want to share my collection of miners with you. This is AMD based, I had 8 r9280x cards separated in 2 rigs. Both had 14.6 drivers installed correctly (not always easy to do.)
https://www.dropbox.com/s/mz7w37bo5dvkxvx/Accordus-miners.zip
Feel free to download above collected miners and config files. They all came from various threads and forums hand picked and selected to reach highest speeds. I have not really made changes to them.
Please note that I have indeed used different miner programs for different algos. This may have something to do with the higher speeds I got for some of the algos.

Guys, I do not know what is going on, but my speeds were higher.

4.3 MHs/card       (= x5.9)   for X11,  @1480W for the total 8 cards
3.05 MHs/card     (= x4.2)   for X13,  @1480W for the total 8 cards
2.955 MHs/card   (= x4.1)   for X15,  @1560W for the total 8 cards
413 MHs/card      (= x17.9)   for NIST5,  @1650W for the total 8 cards
6.2 MHs/card      (= x6.2)   for FRESH,  @1350W for the total 8 cards
0.375 kHs(!)/card   (= x0.00051)   for Cryptonote,  @1650W for the total 8 cards

As I have recently shifted my interest from mining (to more working) I want to share my collection of miners with you. This is AMD based, I had 8 r9280x cards separated in 2 rigs. Both had 14.6 drivers installed correctly (not always easy to do.)
https://www.dropbox.com/s/mz7w37bo5dvkxvx/Accordus-miners.zip
Feel free to download above collected miners and config files. They all came from various threads and forums hand picked and selected to reach highest speeds. I have not really made changes to them.
Please note that I have indeed used different miner programs for different algos. This may have something to do with the higher speeds I got for some of the algos.


If you have reached better performance through the collection of this selected miners please consider donating to my BTC address!
1K8MEHHrNY8Pq8EgeifuLjWTkQX9TgVccC

Thanks!

Cool, I saw ticket also resolved itself! However the site is down under now for a while.
 

OK, so the last exactly 1 hour I have received all what was expected. 54k to be precise.

Kind of strange, but OK!

checking forum time only

By solo mining you mean mining by using a dedicated rig? The exact same thing happens on MRR and BR. Only NH is where you buy hashpower directly.



Well, I just presented my feelings about where the market might be going.


I did not try to suggest such a complicated interface.


Anyways, I look for any chance to lease my rig on LR again!

I am mining on http://ducknote.crypto-pool.fr/ but having my balance stuck for the last 2.5 hours.
This is odd because my initial 1.5 hours were OK and produced payout at the expected time.
But since then, there is nothing.

I wonder why?

Woooopsss, just turned to be unlocked by itself (time spent?) and sending was OK!

But why can I not spend for the second time?

[wallet d--reduct--w]: balance
balance: 5999.90000000, unlocked balance: 0.00000000
[wallet d--reduct--w]: transfer 0 dd--reducted--2 5999 1--reducted--f
Error: not enough money to transfer, available only 0.00000000, transaction amount 5999.10000000 = 5999.00000000 + 0.10000000 (fee)

Thanks, this worked fine!

Guys, how do you copy this insanely long wallet address and transfer id when sending XDN out?
I am on win7 and it does not allow me to paste the line into the colorful consol window.

OK, then sacrifice Stability column. That is the least important measurement I think. Everybody is above 99.5% anyway. So basically there is no difference at all. Or swap row colouring for this measurement. See next.

But I go further.
You know my opinion about Current hash rate (spot measurement) and colouring of rows. That is essentially forcing everybody to state the lowest ever hashrate that happens with the rig on an unlucky moment of the html generation. Trash that. The issue here is that spot measuring has nothing to do with long term average. Yes, average must be correct, but that is what you see under Hire page in section: "Rig stats in past 24 hours". Plain misleading or at least irrelevant on the list page.



(Hmmm, I think "Less is more" could be my main message here with this overall discussion.)

Fantastic news.
The customer universe should triple at least. Remember, the people with interest in "coins" but not having BTC to pay for a rig is numerous. People with access to BTC and still having interest in coins are less and less day by day. (_{Because they already know this whole game...})

Just be loud about it on forums and in advertisements.

This at least>

And any specific set of customers of the customer-universe are free to just not dig for your reasonable price if competition website can give them the same or better result without the hassle.

I am a marketing and sales guy and thinking in customer groups not individuals.

I got you.
BTC/MH/Day data presentation must stay. No question about it! Never said against it. Must have misunderstood somewhere back.

Reasonable pricing by providers for short term is a must if you want to compete on today market.
That's all.

The simplest way to reach this would be to strongly emphasize providers using flat pricing schemes.
Strongly means strongly.

miaviator: You could be true, yes. Seems to me that you are implying with your understanding that most customers rent for full days.
But what normally happens is that providers set their price to (live=known="NiceHash") market profitability plus some margin but only for the longest period. Shorter periods have waaaaay off prices. I mean five times more or similar. Those rents will happen very rare on today markets. Especially because short term customers can easily find their provider on competition.
(And as rent history is gone from the site, I can not prove myself, but this is my feeling.)

What you are really doing is nothing else but selecting customers from your "universe" (total possible customers looking for providers) who are patient to click through Hire buttons multiple times and can write down lot of data and then handle complex comparisons on paper or Excel or in head.
My guess is that this is a limited number of customer set.

I was rented 5 times yesterday on MRR and maximized my earnings with timed pricing decisions. I was not rented longer than 12 hours for the last one week at least, but still made a profit.

Yeah, I saw that being down. Nevermind, I anyway have to do my own actual test.