It seems the porn industry is warming up to Bitcoin. GadgetCoin actually started to work with the porn industry http://[Suspicious link removed]/1LDeFdL
Using Bitcoin, the blockchain and smart contracts GadgetCoin offers 95% cash out for the web-cam models http://[Suspicious link removed]/1GUAH7v
i don't think any altcoin would be able to provide any liquidity to a web cam business or a business model is they are not backup by btc revenue in order to keep the price stable.
That plus, models have a hard time with understanding bitcoins, let alone some coin that they have never heard of.
The main costs behind video streaming are the server, internet traffic and RTMP server licensing. GadgetNet disrupted this business model by decentralizing the streaming. Normally an RTMP server streams the video to the viewers, but in GadgetNets instance the broadcasters push the stream directly to their peers.
Very much wrong, the main cost for a webcam site, is marketing. Remember no one shows up, they don't get paid. Operating cost scale with that. Also decentralized streaming is very poor quality. People want HD, not SD at best and bad bitrates. Even p2p video is not up to the quality people want.
I am not sure why do you think decentralized streaming produces a poor quality. What can be poor in pushing data via UDP peer to peer instead of channelling the data through a centralized RTMP server? The 3600 kbps or even 8000 kbps HD stream primarily depends on bandwidth and not architecture. If the model or studio internet connection supports the HD upload speed which normally does, then the end user receives the HD quality video - the broadcasting peers forwards the very same stream after all. In fact, it is easier to achieve a good quality video push directly from the broadcaster to the end user without an intermediary RTMP server.
Regarding to the operational cost, what I have been hearing from the porn industry is that the marketing cost is large at the beginning, so yes, you are quite right about that, but later the main cost is the server infrastructure and broadcasting. Livejasmin has 30 million daily visitors, a live MyFreecam session often broadcasts to 2000 users and such massive user base requires a very serious infrastructure. That's the very reason LiveJasmin pays out only 40% to new models who don't generate paid traffic. As you said, only the paid live session brings revenue, the rest is only cost at least it is the case in the Livejasmin model.
To minimize the marketing cost our plan is that the models will bring their existing customers to a GadgetNet where the pay out is 95% vs 40-50-60%.
UHMMM no it doesn't work that way but I applaud you for trying. Do you have benchmarks to support those claims?
LOL that isn't how it works models like to be exposed to new people and bring an audience is easier said then done.
I am on my phone so I can't be detailed.
LoL someone is worried about the competition
and what an ultimate authority you are legendary gweedo

one, 1 girl on your "webcam" site, speaks hungarian to a hungarian guy, probably you, while 1 visitor watch the lamest ever show on your site.
You have 1 webcam model on your site after 6 months of operation and you are the smart ass here and educate the audience how the adult industry works. It's just embarrassing man. Your site is the lamest adult web site I have ever seen.
I checked out the gadgetcoin, gadgetnet and jizzmo.net business model, they pay 95% of the models. The web-cam models will move to that service, it is just no brainier, and yes the model will move their clients to jizzmo.net too.
Go way man with your 1 model website and don't present yourself as someone who knows how the adult industry works, because your 6 months old service with 1 model indicates what you know about adult business and live video broadcasting.