This was quite obviously a specific unforseen issue which the developers have been quick to identify and work on solutions.  For those who don't know, many other coins including Bitcoin have gone through similar issues with new wallet releases.  Shooting from the hip with accusations is a waste of your energy and my time.

I respect that and just to be clear I wasn't meaning you about emotion and wanting to just pump etc.  I got into vrc a few months ago and was lucky to sell some at 17000 Satoshi.  I typically range trade because the spreads are so high it's crazy profitable for those who can be patient with certain trades.  I understand critiquing ICOs.  Maybe Verium shouldn't have been an ICO..idk.  I know that one of Vericoin's struggles is having no marketing.  So it becomes a catch 22.  If there is zero hype, there is unfortunately much less chance of aspects of the technology being properly recognized for issues they solve.  Ideally the hype comes from users but you have to market to even have a chance to eventually have a user base.  I encourage people to do their own research and to trade without emotion.  I want people to invest in VeriCoin because I think it has some unique and brilliant (and necessary) components to the future of decentralized money, and awkwardly enough it takes investments and a growing market cap to be on people's radar. But I highly discourage anyone from investing more than a small amount.  At this stage it's essentially priced like a penny stock.  As much as I like the specifics, the market cap is what it is.  If the price goes to zero tomorrow I would of course lose money, wish the devs well in life, and go on investing and staying diversified.  For now the technology is still being developed and while there are low priced coins they are not dead at all from a development side.

Of course.  I'm a trader as well and I believe alts need traders as much as they need investors and users.  Traders provide liquidity.  I encourage you to trade whatever you want and I will do the same.  What I am against is completely inaccurate finger pointing.  Traders trade but should have the stomach to take a few blows and not place false blame.  Most motives are selfish and that makes shit happen.  I'm all for that.  On the other side, discouragement of trial and error of improving this technology is ridiculous.  A trader needs to accept his losses and move on instead of shouting angrily that he wants a pump to get out.  Emotional traders lose money.

The same guy (you) who admitted he is holding vrc and wants a pump so he can get out is one of the biggest bashers on vericoinforums and here.  My sarcastic side gets a good laugh there.  Shooting yourself in the foot like Barney Fife.  Fun fact.. the developers were planning Verium WITHOUT an ICO.  People who wanted a pump are the ones who were fighting for an ICO on the forums.  Using Verium and Vericoin's lack of volume as an argument that the coins have no value is interesting.  Look around.  Essentially all coins pump and that indeed earns them a higher market cap despite not solving any existing base problems.  Adding the time variable on the VeriCoin and Verium coins gives them something that is essential if block chain is going mainstream.  If you don't believe or understand that, feel free to ask questions.  Being openly pissed off your coin didn't get pumped (or that you didn't sell out when the small pump happened) is childish.  This is about improving on technology.  To many here it is only about money.  Development must continue despite the whims of traders.

My i5 6600K ran with 4 out of 4 processors for hours with no crash..282 hash.  Won 10 blocks so far.  My laptop (AMD A8-6410 APU) shows 110 hash with 4/4 processors and currently shows 30 connections.  It thought it won at least 2 blocks but they disappeared.  Not sure if that is what appears to be my 10 to 20 second latency or what.  Also using wifi on both computers.  How many posts do I need to not be a noob so I can vote?  =)