Post the signed message and the source of the address (link to where you have posted it) here. If it verifies, I will tag the account until it has been recovered.

Who said anything about it being easy to cheat?

That thread didn't debunk anything - it just said that miners can't pick the block hash. However, they can still no broadcast blocks that contain a losing hash, and hope to get a winning hash. A bad actor pool might make a large bet on every character except one with a very low (possibly 0) fee. They can than use bitcoind to treat their tx as a 100 BTC fee transaction, so it would be added into the next block the pool finds. They can set it so the pool owner needs to check the block before it's broadcast to the network, and if it is a losing hash, they can chose to withhold the block (screwing the miners, but letting them be more likely to win).

Just for everyone too lazy to do the maths, if you are betting > 0.04 BTC per bet, this site offers better odds.

I can foresee that in future chain-bet.com may turn into a temple for high rollers.

If you're betting less than that, you're better off playing a traditional 1% casino.

Although personally I'd be too skeptical to play here. The site is trivial for a miner to profitably (and undetectably) cheat...   (and even more so for a mining pool, which can cheat it's miners at the same time if they have to discard a block)

I don’t think so it is just a 0.0002 increase after all, I mean it is not per bet increase neither just a transaction fee increase. Considering 0.0002 is just 25 cents it is not that much to consider when you are gambling. If you are worrying about a 25 cent increase than you shouldn’t be gambling anyway.

Due to increase in average cost of confirming a Bitcoin transaction, we are hereby increasing transaction processing fee from 0.0002 BTC to 0.0004 BTC. We understand, this might impact small bet amounts, but to ensure faster processing of bet forwarding Tx and winning amount sending Tx, we had no other way. Sorry for the inconvenience caused.

https://twitter.com/Chain_Bet_/status/854662731085078528

I can't open this site..
work now?

my suggestion is Bitsler.com (with 1% house edge)

Yes,there you go : http://www.coolmath-games.com/

If I had FPGA miner that worked I would tell no one .. I would just mine with it.

So why did they claim to have one?

Because no one requested it, we don't actively search for websites people must submit a request for them to be added.

I came across a pretty new gambling game called https://www.Chain-Bet.com in another thread. They seems to be on chain and using the last digit of a block hash as random number. Have anyone here tried this so far ? Would like to have some feedback before I start playing there.

I might will try to guess 15 number / character at one transaction , is it possible btw?

3. Can I generate multiple addresses and send bitcoins to them in a single transaction?

No. Only the amount sent to the first address generated will be considered as bet and all other amounts sent in that transaction will be considered as donation.

Not true and this was discussed many times here before. The casinos don't need 0% house edge to make money. The casinos make money because of human emotion, greed, and fear. Only reason most Casinos don't have 0% house edge is because there would be too many bots, and the bots they couldn't beat since computers don't feel emotion.

Anyway, investing money in bitcoinbetting.website sounds like a horrible idea, even if you were doing it for gambling purposes. The whole point of investors is that you can offer bigger max wins, but as soon as bitcoinbetting.website max-win is > ~13 BTC, now miners can actually start to cheat on the website, and undetectably rip you off. The only thing that makes the site reasonably secure, is the prizes are small

I think the "threshold" for risking losing 99.99% of earning 12.5 BTC is a gamble of how many percent of their hashpower is to the total network of about double or triple. Or 25 BTC. Or more.

No miner in his right mind will give up the current block reward for anything less than double or triple that. I think no miner would give up 12.5 BTC unless the gamble has a higher than 50% chance of earning 25 BTC, or a higher than 75% of earning 50 BTC (if the bet or prize gets that big).

Now if the last digit of a block hash is used in conjunction with a secret, then the website owner would have to collude with a large or strong miner or a pool.

Currently, there is no known single pool or sufficiently large solo miner that has the hashpower to even consider this kind of attack, plus it is a gamble, so why would they do it?


Nope. Too risky for a winning amount that small. I'd rather take the 12.5 BTC because I have that now. (not even guaranteed).

I definitely would not, as I am expected to make absolutely no profit. I have investments in BitVest.io, Crypto-Games.net and BetKing.io because those games operate on a house edge, and I am expected to make a profit. Those games also have more volume as well, so profits would be more stable or losses would be lowered. By investing into a game with no expected profit, I'm exposing myself to more risk, for less reward.

i don't think so.

because people usually don't use good strategies and they are wasting their money in most of these gambling sites.

for example i have seen new dice sites that start off with a 0% house edge and there aren't that many winners on the site to win and bankrupt the casino.

house edge is like a guarantee in my opinion.

and also add to this, the fact that a lot of the gamblers will continue gambling when they win and if a losing streak hits them they lose all they have won so far.

this game is house free

---

we are coding it and make it running with big players ,like 10btc 100btc 1000btc per bet ,and thx