Partially off-topic:

I was asked for ensuring OP's identity. So yes, I know OP in person. I know him as honest and very active in local (Czech) community. As he is developing this project quite long time, I know this project as well in detail. So it's real

Maybe I seem quite as newbie but I'm just no very active on Bitcointalk but very active in Bitcoin (also check my register date).

That is the thing! Thank you!

I created address by standard way, then in console
creates new witness address from it. And transaction from has "txinwitness" part and so on.
Another good tool with examples is https://blockchainprogramming.azurewebsites.net/checktx

Thank you again.

Hi,

I'm trying to understand how SegWit transaction looks like.

In article Segregated Witness, Part 1 on BitcoinMagazine.com is written

(embolden by me)

So I tried to send some segnet bitcoin from faucet to my address. The transaction outputs look like


This looks like standard transaction to me. When I pick random transaction from current blockchain, let's say https://blockchain.info/tx/a569b7a41c9a2567b4a4bad4ed59f5e846cc30d652b448ff6430018fe0bf3128, I see:


on output, so the same format.

Also when I get transaction from segwit in hexadecimal and try to decode it in current Bitcoin version, it is the same (except the addresses because address version).

Please, can someone enlighten me what is different on SegWit? Where I can see the witness part? I'm definitely missing something…

Thanks a lot

Don't you mean my WalletExplorer.com?

www.walletexplorer.com

It isn't how it works. When someone sends you 10 BTC to address A, any next transaction muset be signed with address A. Not address B. If you want to send it from address B, you must send it to B from A firstly.

When do you want anonymity, the best thing that you can do is use any online wallet with shared wallet - any exchange, online bet web and so on - just send BTC to it, wait a moment, send BTC to another address. New bitcoins will be probably other than bitcoins that you sent before.

Pool owners have voting rights. They make decisions, miners only sign it.

But it´s democracy - when miner don´t agree with pool´s decisions, he can simply mine at another pool. Or he can mine itself. Or he can create own pool, take people with the same opinions and they mine themselves.

However, there are very few things what pools can change, i.e. only if some transaction will be in this block or not.

Definitelly smaller. We have 2e7 used addressed now, so total space is ~ 5e40 times larger.

Ok, thank you very much. It's a pity but I savvy it. Linked services I'll try.
So thanks again.

Thank you very much for your reply. If more instances of running program with the same wallet isn't possible, I think it should be documented.

But OK, so I can other scenario:
I have 2 computers, one at home, one at work. I'm running bitcoin at home, then I shut it down, go to work, start running bitcoin there, with the same wallet. Then shut down, go to home, start bitcoin at home and so on. BUT: I don't synchronize files (~/.bitcoin). So I don't run more instances of the same wallet but I don't synchronize current state.

It's this possible? Will be synchronized sent and received payments or are there other problems? Or rather I should use two different wallets, one at home and one at work?
Thanks

Hi,

I would like to use bitcoins but I'm using more than one computer. Can I use just one wallet on all computers (by copying settings)? Or it isn't possible?

What happened if someone send me money and bitcoin client run on more computers? What happened if I send money to anyone from one of clients? Will it be synchronized automatically?

Maybe it's a simple quetsion but I didn't find answer to this.
Thanks.