They've been addressing this issue countless amount of times. Despite the fact that founding members are the same, team are completely different. You should do your own research if you really want to know facts in comparison to some random things enjin bitcointalk moderator are saying.

Well, I stopped getting why someone saying it's 2 ICO's at the same time. As far as I know, DMarket crowdsale ends up on 28th of November. I checked the time for the DreamTeam project and they're starting their presale in December. It seems like they don't run two icos simultaneously. Plus, the projects are very different and it's quite understandable that they are doing two campaigns. From what i heard in the recent interviews, Panchenko is working on DMarket 95% of the time, while Alex is on top of this other project.

For me, the biggest reason to trust Dmarket team is that they don't offer any sort of discounts for both presale and crowdsale. The bigger discount you give to people, the more they would buy because of the discount.  If they are up for the 'money grab', why would they limit the opportunity to get more money?  This seems illogical.

Dude are you ok? I've been watching you spitting shit here for quite a while already. This is getting ridiculous.

Just a few messages before you've been talking about them having the same teams, requesting to show other employees. Well, they did. If you have your arms adjusted to the body, you can easily check names via linkedin.
I did a research for you and here are just two random people from the team list they provided. Proof pics below:

https://i.imgur.com/46Zs2Iq.png
https://i.imgur.com/SYwNZcP.png
https://i.imgur.com/jxhlVqm.png


Those guys from another project you are referring to even have LINKEDIn LINKS for every single team member. You need to just CLICK ON them and stop talking this nonsense.

From what I see, only cofounders are the same. Do you think cofounders are writing the code by themselves? Or doing marketing another and support? Are you serious?


P.S. At first I was thinking you may be right and your messages kinda put me in the mood of doing my own research. Thanks for that btw. But then i checked both projects and realized you either a troll, or a representative of the shady competitor, using DPR to drown projects you are afraid of.  After checking your last posts on Bitcointalk I realized you are the guy posting updates on Enjin's thread, calling yourself 'We' in the Enjin:

https://i.imgur.com/itlLs7k.png

https://i.imgur.com/wi9YPvk.png

To sum up: If i were you, I'd stop talking absolutely random things.

FOR OTHERS READING THIS: CHECK JACOB70's PROFILE. IT'S VERY EASY TO UNDERSTAND THAT ENJIN IS USING A DISGUSTING STRATEGY AGAINST THEIR OWN COMPETITORS. THOSE KINDA THINGS MEAN THEY CAN'T COMPETE FAIRLY. THINK TWITCE BEFORE WORKING WITH THEM

I think that bitcoin and the worlds poverty are not that directly connected. It is definitely not a solution to solve thousands of issues in the developing countries.

- Analize the market and use the best opportunity to buy bitcoins.
- Participate in one of the funds
- Mine other digital currencies (besides bitcoin)

Money is a resource, a way to achieve smth and access valuable assets. It shouldn't be seen as an ultimate goal, but as a way to achieve the desired.

Paper money is already playing a smaller part in our lives, ultimately being left behind for card operations. Cruptocurrency might be a next step here - a short glimpse at what to expect in the future.

A promise of easy profits + low moral restrictions = scam

Bitcoin has the potential to change the world economy. Yet it is far from controlling it.

A good investor fully understands the risk of investing, can predict the returns and has a plan to follow. He also has the knowledge, experience and confidence. Those should be the main qualities.

I'm a bit concerned about the security of ethereum. Nevertheless, it's still the best alternative to BTC.

Check the team, evaluate the concept.
Look through the advisors.
Chech their roadmap, their whitepaper, their hard and soft cap.

Currently holding ETH, BCC and LTC

There was a saying that it's not safe to live - people die from this. There is always a risk. The catch is to measure the risks and potential profits carefully.

Seems like just another marketing scheme, no more. Will surely attract some attention from the general public. Yet, if the celebrity is not directly connected to crypto or smth, I believe that a really low percent of fans will be really into this.