Search content
Sort by
Showing 4 of 4 results by AllYourBasesBelong2Us
...
A cynic might also read a little too much in this offering:
a) These high end guys may have some intel on how close ETH is to the end of the PoW phase.
b) They also may know something about the next generation of cards and that the advantage of their mod(s) maybe reduced.
A cynic might also read a little too much in this offering:
a) These high end guys may have some intel on how close ETH is to the end of the PoW phase.
b) They also may know something about the next generation of cards and that the advantage of their mod(s) maybe reduced.
Couldn't agree more. If you follow her last posts on bitcointalk she switched to the 'green' team.
twitter states also that she went to asia and is thrilled about the new things that are coming from nvidia e.g. gddr6 etc.
maybe a swing by to bitmain and other asic manufacturers to see their latest eth miners (not the e3) *lol*
who knows, ohgod what a gossip
Re: Claymore's miner ETH fee removed (Win 64bit only)
redo:
according to https://github.com/Demion/nodevfee/issues/28#issuecomment-366338759
there is a wallet address found in libeth.dll =/
0x0b374e2f03dDe62aBdC7D28a9efa2081a93974aA
according to https://github.com/Demion/nodevfee/issues/28#issuecomment-366338759
there is a wallet address found in libeth.dll =/
0x0b374e2f03dDe62aBdC7D28a9efa2081a93974aA
Re: Claymore's miner ETH fee removed (Win 64bit only)
[...]
Is it right to bypass claymore's fee and reroute to Eth_Savers wallet instead? (https://github.com/d3z00r/Claymore-11.0-No-DevFee-DevFee-Removed)
It's in the crypto DNA to hack shit, even the hackers get hacked
..IMO, I say fair game, let it roll!.
Seems legit. If I comprehend that stuff he did correctly, he did the minimum of changing the orig code to exclude dev fee routine.
P.S: funny things you one see, when debugging through code /watch?v=hL0Vkz0etwg