Before I start please I don't understand this statement

Change is usually accompanied by some resistance, and Bitcoin aim was to deviate from the traditional reliant on centralized to decentralized, was satoshi reason for halving to increase the public knowledge on Bitcoin before it is fully mined?

If there wasn't any halving Bitcoin would had been fully mined around 2019-2020 with 50Btc per block, would it have been another digital currency implementation failure or would it still be surviving?

una well done

Okay most of my question na about mining sha

I go like know how e b wen una start una mining
Like no institute dey wey dey teach am so how una take grow una knowledge

I just find out say this forum dey since 2009, but why e nor popular? because me just find out this year

The Bitcoin miners here una dey mine Bitcoin secretly abi government nor get issue with ahn

Our light matter nor dey affect the mining machine?

if I wan start mining wetin go b d challenge wey I go face

I find out say many people here dey code abeg coding dey important to mine Bitcoin?

Okay my question don dey too many.

As I first talk am title dey hard me run

 Thank you as una answer

I want to move my Bitcoin from my trustwallet to another hot wallet that is compatible with IOS

Read here of some things a good wallet should posses but not in trustwallet.

The platform supports Electrum but I saw it wasn't compatible with IOS.

seeing this prevented me from diving into ledger.

Am in need of a wallet for IOS that supports RBF, multiple address generation among others.

Okay am bumping this.

Not sure why its not pinned yet but...

I am sure that if am able to finish this Post's there's no way I would be called a newbie.

Admire the dedication put into this and the post referenced.

Would be an honor to make this list one day.

Please can you add this if it's not here already Terminology.

The internet going down is almost impossible
there exist no switch or central command that can be destroyed
Even in the face of nuclear weapon the internet would still stand strong
Only the region would b affected not the internet
Anything that brings down the internet
Would be something that can threaten our survival or all electronics
Assuming it shuts down
The Bitcoin blockchain will stop producing new block
But would resume once the internet is back on
The internet is not a want
It's a necessity
Definitely, the goal would b to bring it up if it gets down
In all its unlikely and if it occurs
I believe your investment would be the last thing you would think about.
Short answer Bitcoin potential.
Long answer: Check on the advantages of cryptocurrency and why Bitcoin was created
The 2008 bank crisis brought distrust on investors with saving their money in Banks
Bitcoin was able to create a market from that and unlike fiat money Bitcoin itself is limited in supply and inflation resistant .

I saw you in an ongoing thread about blockchains event
I can't really think of a reason you had to create another
Different people already gave their views in the thread that covers most of your question in the questionnaire
if you had analysed and done your research you should have seen the type of people that attends( investor's, developer's, enthusiasts etc)
Well personally never been
Not something have seen or been held in my country am aware of
Currently not interested since I see no benefit for me
Except from knowledge which I can just ask here

I never said it did
You said hash centralization wasn't in the hand of the government
Was just trying to point out that's its still in the hands of centralize group
Doesn't mean its any better.
Yeah am aware that the hardware(ASICs) upgrades to increase hash per second are expensive thus the increase in Bitcoin mining cost
How is the reduction independent from mining sector?
I thought halving reduces Bitcoin mined per block
Higher hash rate are needed for higher computations to validate transactions and expensive hardwares boast of better hash per second.
As the halving continue it would get harder to get a Bitcoin so miners would continue to pool resources together to get better machines to create higher hashes

But in the hand of a centralize group? Bitcoin mining grows more expensive so is the Bitcoin mined per block reduce every four years
This I believe would continue increasing centralization
Which is somehow different from the goal of decentralization
I guess you have been unfortunate to experience or seen this. You said interesting changes take collaboration, does that mean there's like a group that focuses on Bitcoin core developments?
In the case of Halving, I believe what you saying is halving was a way for Bitcoin to strive but not the only way
And then sell after the hype to buy the dip and wait for the next halving

A person that would need assurance on Bitcoin dominance and resilience know nothing about what Bitcoin entails
What it has survived
Why it was created
And the need it came to satisfy
Bitcoin has passed through many turbulent situations like the Bankruptcy of FTX which lead to a dip due to sentiments but it still stayed strong like a Cockroach.
Bitcoin would face more difficulties, changes is usually accompanied by some resistance.
The Government(SEC) attack just means we in the right path.

According to @ETFBitcoin a contactless card already exist the Bolt card by coincorner and the audience is pretty low
I still can't see how its better than using Mobile wallet since losing the card would allow any body make use of the card without been traced
If it occurs who would the person report to?
I still find having POS terminal for Bitcoin similar to traditional method of using third parties
This is like centralized exchanges acting like banks and issuing ATM's

The question should be are second layer network the future of Bitcoin payment? Lightning network won't be the only second layer network by then and besides by then the transactions made would be freaking high, can lightning network alone solve the scalability issue?

No offense, but I laffed
Because I found it funny since I have read
The thread @Hyphen recommended.

That's what I thought until I found this
so wanted to confirm how true it was.
The flasher enables the transaction to reflect
on the blockchain and wallet
But remains unconfirmed
I didn't understand how that was possible
Hence the thread.

Thanks.
Lol but I think I have basic knowledge about Bitcoin
My question was on Bitcoin flasher
Have never experienced it or seen it
So wanted to know how it works
And if anybody has come across it
I never said I was venturing into any business about crypto
Personally I feel it's too risky and not regulated

The reward system is nice
But shouldn't be tied to cracking a Bitcoin wallet
They should focus on their course of study
Bitcoin may relieve student debt doesn't mean its an appropriate method
What about in countries where Bitcoin are illegal?
Bitcoin trading or Holding requires patience and time
Personally' I don't really take any teaching
that's been excessive serious.
Bitcoin awareness isn't all about understanding its technicalities
There are better ways to assist students or creating Bitcoin awareness.

I jam one post https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5461151.msg62606649#msg62606649
 wey dey talk about issues wey business people
dey experrience wen dem dey use bitcoin for their business.

We don hear about fake alert dem yahoo guys dey use
I jux find out las week say sth like dat dey bitcoin
Dem dey call ahn Bitcoin flasher
Example na coin celler
e fit let person send fake Bitcoin wey go reflect
But go commot after some days
I hear say e get some people here wey dey buy and sell bitcoin to people
If u don hear about ahn
How person fit take know or avoid ahn?
Abi na Cex una take dey run una trades

@OP wall test with no bold test or lines are kinda hard to read
I wasn't planning on checking out because of the layout
But I'm glad I did
I have come across views on how game theory was applied by satoshi
It was really fun but not absolute
makes it seem like
It has been proven that satoshi devised a version.
As it's already been seen
Satoshi was a good economist
So he would have applied different model including the game theory while creating Bitcoin.
About the 2.625BTC am curious where the 8M came from
from the supposed email reply of satoshi to Hearn.
There are other theories but I'm not stressing myself over it
So sticking with an educated guess.

Opposing view is vital in Bitcoin decentralization.
Supporting views might create an hive.
Which would require a queen bee.
Even in the political system it check and balance power.
More opposing nodes would reduce efficiency
But would boost effectives.
I believe its at least more than 15.7million Mbps.
Which was recorded by a company around 2021.
I'm not sure there's any full node user in Nigeria.
Not to mention we kinda skeptical
Towards 5g network.
Due to belief that it releases more radiation
Than other network.
So 4G is more popular here.
Yeah I understand your view.
Fortunately technological development isn't stagnant.
The faster the growth the cheaper the previous version's.
As long as technology growth is higher than Bitcoin's.
I would say there's nothing to worry about
I still believe scalability as a bigger issue for Bitcoin currently.

I know is nigh impossible for companies to last forever
So I wanted to know since most Bitcoin holder are HODL
What would happen to a wallet when the company hosting the wallet closes down?
Has any wallet company ever closed down before or experienced issue that affected holders Bitcoin?

Big thanks have seen its features.

It even has darkmode 

Already downloading it.

Oh thanks never knew about the thread

okay will just create a new address to prevent any but.

I want to move my Bitcoin from my trustwallet to another hot wallet that is compatible with IOS

Read here of some things a good wallet should posses but not in trustwallet.

The platform supports Electrum but I saw it wasn't compatible with IOS.

While the review I read about ledger app wasn't encouraging.

Am in need of a wallet for IOS that supports RBF, multiple address generation among others.

OP must have done a lot of research
I found it educative
There are something's I would like to add
They are personal opinion's though
1. Bitcoin hacking is not impossible but so hard that some consider it impossible
2. Bitcoin target was decentralization before security, so POW was used not just for security but since it works better in a decentralized blockchain
3.Bitcoin isn't safe because of developers, Every user of Bitcoin play a role in its security and trust, The miners have their roles, full Nodes, even normal users usage and belief in Bitcoin makes it safe.

These are the few I could think of currently.
Thank you.