Ninjastic
Search content
Sort by
Showing 6 of 6 results by Anamorphic
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Set Global Electricity Price (per kWh) via API?
by
Anamorphic
on 06/06/2019, 21:13:44 UTC
Quote from: patrike on June 06, 2019, 07:57:47 PM
Quote from: patrike on June 03, 2019, 05:43:33 PM
Quote from: Anamorphic on June 03, 2019, 04:24:23 PM
Quote from: patrike on June 02, 2019, 08:47:48 PM
Quote from: Anamorphic on May 31, 2019, 08:23:37 PM
Hey Patrike,
Is there a way to set the Global Electricity Price (per kWh) via HTTP API?
Thank you!
There are no feature to set the value via API today.

You can set the price via the Rules, where you can use the Action called Set Property. You can for example use the rules to define different electricity prices depending on time or day. Rule actions can also be triggered via the API if needed.

I do understand this doesn't give as much flexibility as having an API method for setting an exact price from an external application. Please let me know if you still prefer the API method and I will look into supporting it when possible. Thanks!
Hey Patrike,

If you could add it to your ever expanding "to-do list" that would be awesome! That would help me a lot!

Here in Texas we have the option to go with a variable rate electricity plan that changes the price per kWh every 5 minutes. I'm currently monitoring the real-time price and have different rules and profiles setup in AM for my miners. For example, if the price per kWh goes crazy, up to say $1.00 /kWh, then my mine basically shuts down until the price drops. If the price goes negative (which happens often at night), the miners will overclock and go nuts!

One more thought that might open up a whole new world of possibilities for AM: What if you gave us the option to pass a variable into AM via API that could be used elsewhere in the application? Maybe just a few empty variable slots (Var1, Var2, Var3, etc.) then those variables could be used as "Triggers" inside a rule. Just a thought.

Thanks again!
The API method for electricity price should be possible to include in the near future as it's only a matter of exposing a feature already available.

Thanks for the suggestion about variables, that would make sense as well. Another concept available already today via the triggers are Miner Tags. You can set Tags on miners via the API and you can have trigger looking at certain tags.
A short update about the API method for setting the global electricity price:
POST http://mypc:17790/api/settings/electricity_price?value=0.075
This feature is available in Awesome Miner 6.5.3

You're awesome! Thank you SOOO much Patrike!!!!
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Set Global Electricity Price (per kWh) via API?
by
Anamorphic
on 03/06/2019, 16:24:23 UTC
Quote from: patrike on June 02, 2019, 08:47:48 PM
Quote from: Anamorphic on May 31, 2019, 08:23:37 PM
Hey Patrike,
Is there a way to set the Global Electricity Price (per kWh) via HTTP API?
Thank you!
https://imgur.com/s27p4vJ
There are no feature to set the value via API today.

You can set the price via the Rules, where you can use the Action called Set Property. You can for example use the rules to define different electricity prices depending on time or day. Rule actions can also be triggered via the API if needed.

I do understand this doesn't give as much flexibility as having an API method for setting an exact price from an external application. Please let me know if you still prefer the API method and I will look into supporting it when possible. Thanks!


Hey Patrike,

If you could add it to your ever expanding "to-do list" that would be awesome! That would help me a lot!

Here in Texas we have the option to go with a variable rate electricity plan that changes the price per kWh every 5 minutes. I'm currently monitoring the real-time price and have different rules and profiles setup in AM for my miners. For example, if the price per kWh goes crazy, up to say $1.00 /kWh, then my mine basically shuts down until the price drops. If the price goes negative (which happens often at night), the miners will overclock and go nuts!

One more thought that might open up a whole new world of possibilities for AM: What if you gave us the option to pass a variable into AM via API that could be used elsewhere in the application? Maybe just a few empty variable slots (Var1, Var2, Var3, etc.) then those variables could be used as "Triggers" inside a rule. Just a thought.

Thanks again!

Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Set Global Electricity Price (per kWh) via API?
by
Anamorphic
on 31/05/2019, 20:23:37 UTC
Hey Patrike,
Is there a way to set the Global Electricity Price (per kWh) via HTTP API?
Thank you!
https://imgur.com/s27p4vJ
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 10000 miners
by
Anamorphic
on 21/05/2018, 15:02:56 UTC
Quote from: patrike on May 20, 2018, 07:05:50 AM
Quote from: Anamorphic on May 18, 2018, 03:16:14 PM
Hi Patrike,

I have a couple questions / suggestions.

1. It would be awesome if you could add the ability for Rules to trigger other Rules. For example, if the temperature of (X set of Antminer S9's Miners) exceeds X, then trigger other Rule/s. The other Rule could lower the OC value of the Antminer L3's sitting next to the S9's, lowering the temp of the affected area. There are so many other valuable options that could be created if Rules could trigger other Rules.

2. Is there a way, or can you add a way to natively enable extranonce subscribe (#xnsub) to AM's multipools? I've tried several variations on the "Online Services" panel, and they end up with the URL of the pool breaking. Instead of the Algo's Port # being added to the end of the pool, it adds a -1. See below for pictures.

https://imgur.com/a/yayNcV5

Thank you!
1) Thanks for your suggestions on this. It's an interesting concept. I assume the main reason is that you want this to not have to define the same actions in many rules. Where you also thinking that if the other rule to execute is selected to run only on specific miners, it will be applied for those specific miners when executed? So the first rule might perform action on Miner#1 and then execute another rule that might be specified to execute only on "Miner#2 and Miner#3" - or should it be configurable that the other rule also should execute on the original Miner#1?

2) Antminers only allows the #xnsub to be specified as part of the default pools (toolbar: Tools -> Antminer -> Default Pools). It's being ignored by the Antminer when you send it via Change/Add Pool operations.


You're most welcome! Yes exactly! I was thinking that a rule triggered by Miner#1 could execute another rule that specified Miner#2 & Miner#3, or any other subset of Miners, say Miner#1, #2, #3, etc. Simply being able to create rules that trigger other rules will create a whole new world of possibilities. Sort of an "If /Then" logic tree.

Thanks Patrike!
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 10000 miners
by
Anamorphic
on 18/05/2018, 15:16:14 UTC
Hi Patrike,

I have a couple questions / suggestions.

1. It would be awesome if you could add the ability for Rules to trigger other Rules. For example, if the temperature of (X set of Antminer S9's Miners) exceeds X, then trigger other Rule/s. The other Rule could lower the OC value of the Antminer L3's sitting next to the S9's, lowering the temp of the affected area. There are so many other valuable options that could be created if Rules could trigger other Rules.

2. Is there a way, or can you add a way to natively enable extranonce subscribe (#xnsub) to AM's multipools? I've tried several variations on the "Online Services" panel, and they end up with the URL of the pool breaking. Instead of the Algo's Port # being added to the end of the pool, it adds a -1. See below for pictures.

https://imgur.com/a/yayNcV5

Thank you!
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Zpool - Sha256 issue
by
Anamorphic
on 27/11/2017, 22:58:26 UTC
Hi Patrike,

Zpool's Sha-256 algo is reporting incorrectly, both on their own website, and on AwesomeMiner. I spoke to the Zpool folks, and they said the below:

Me: "Hey guys, is the Sha-256 algo really paying out like the zpool website is listing it as? If so, my balance doesnt seem to be reflecting the massive pump on Zpool currently. Maybe broken API somewhere?"
Zpool: "mBTC per PH"
Me: "Did y'all make a change recently? Becuase it looks like it's reporting incorrectly on your website as well."
Zpool: "well... it was a longtime ago, but just noticed I didn't change the actual stratum to PH, just the front end
so, these are what it should have been a long time ago. Missed a few 000's"

Anyway, can you fix?

Thank you!