it is secured and has thousands of public nodes, that perform transactions. this eliminates the risk of the “51% attack”.plus Ethereum has a huge crypto community and a strong development team.

a power plant with a capacity of 200 MW and an annual energy generation of 1 752 000 MWh and solar and wind farms with a capacity of 100MW with an annual energy generation of 876 000 MWh.

The idea is promising, and I think if it is brought to the industrial level it will be very popular. But on the other hand, a power plant is an overwhelming cost, you need a staff of power engineers, and you also need to hang up mining equipment on them, for some reason.

Now sky-high communal prices will be at least somehow justified

Panel manufacturing is expensive and pollutes the environment. For electric vehicles, it’s environmentally friendly because charging takes place mostly at night.

It would be better to give an economic justification in which region it is most profitable to mine based on the price of electricity

In global warming! And, by the way, it’s not a fact that in hot countries such skating rinks really exist and at the same time real ice is used there, and not artificial. But the medal always has two sides. Of course, the crazy (and essentially meaningless) conversion of clean energy (electricity) into entropy (heat) is not good, but it should still contribute to progress both in the field of electricity generation and in the semiconductor industry

as for me I think the project is worthwhile and everything is taken mainly from centralized decisions in the world and transferred to the crypt

Perhaps it will be a discovery, but with such proof-of-stake parameters, a coin-age-based system, even in combination with proof-of-work, cannot be stable. Although if the goal was to achieve the highest percentage of orphans, then the direction is right.

it's going to be an IEO! Not ICO!

As far as I know, it is now profitable to install solar panels and this direction is legally supported.

At night, the equipment runs on batteries. And here is the worst. Battery power is significantly more expensive than a power outlet. Batteries are expensive and need to be replaced periodically. Is it only an option to consider. During the day - solar panels, at night - from the outlet. In this case, a two-tariff meter must be installed. Electricity is cheaper at night. and still, make an electric stove. The tariff with electric stoves is even cheaper. It depends on the region.

Yes, it’s better to buy 1050 or 1060, as most people like here, you can save on this. Remember, if investments do not beat back for six months, this does not mean that it is not profitable.

Although no, without batteries another scheme comes out. It turns out that it is necessary to hang about 1.5 kW of real power of solar panels. Those 250 watts that are declared on the panel can be safely divided into three. It turns out that for 1 anti-miner you need 18 "250 W" panels, this is 3600 USD and 29 squares of area. Will work as long as there is direct lighting. Xs, how circuits will survive multiple spontaneous outages.

another thing is that in the case of a solar power plant, the round-the-clock operation is provided by short-lived and expensive batteries, therefore, I agree with the conclusion.

see the profit calculator

I would ask visitors about each other's tolerance

Maybe in the near future, the price of solar panels and their payback will reach the price of kW.

This is not the first year that Elon Musk has been working on this. In the foreseeable future, after a while, their launch will cost 10 times cheaper.

I think that this whole idea is still utopian. The possibilities of alternative energy are greatly exaggerated. And in general - the idea of ​​looking for scientists who come up with a new source of energy is a comic of some kind. And if you find a scientist, but he won’t come up with, then how?