Search content
Sort by
Showing 9 of 9 results by Arigatoalexis
⭐ Merited by notscam420 (1)
Why have I been framed?
I will tell you the whole story of this plot, so you can easily understand how I was framed here.
The incident happened a long time ago when a manager named "Kakatua" was running a forum project with his multi account group. Then a famous user of my Bengali community "invincible49" introduced the Kakatua group as a multi group. And their accounts are given negative trust for the offense of multiple accounts.
Since then, the "Kakatua" group has developed a grudge against invincible49, and the revenge of that grudge is the current event.
The Kakatua group didn't stop after getting feedback from 34 other accounts including kakatua. From then on began the "SmallRabbit" management fraud. Their journey could not go far. Invincible stops them from cheating and destroys the entire group by putting them under a penalty.
Since then he distanced himself from Bounty Manager and started his journey with a bought account "Smartaction" and he started working on a reputable campaign. But even from there invincible49 caught him and managed to get the account back to its original owner.
In each case invincible49 then plays a role in delivering the cheating cycle.
Now the bottom line is that the cheating cycle has been repeatedly damaged by invincible49 but in no case they have been able to retaliate. As a result, the fraud circle later compared invincible49 to me and started thinking that I (LDL) was personally invincible49 (Now inactive) and they took a kind of invisible revenge on me with their created group (nitscam420/Xavi20/Topman21....). Forcing report and sending a planned $40 bitcoin (to my LDL address) connected to (Topman21) report which was all their planned plot or animosity.
I have a request for you to think about it. If I (LDL) were multi of topman21 could I self harm myself. Actually I am caught in an invisible web of deception. Please think about it and then decide. I am waiting for your decision.
Proof :
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5234050.msg54059655#msg54059655
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg54075994#msg54075994
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5234050.msg54403983#msg54403983
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5248670.msg54448749#msg54448749
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5234050.msg57621003#msg57621003
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5351159.msg57633244#msg57633244
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5234050.msg57640947#msg57640947
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5365814.msg58402850#msg58402850
Kakatua(34+ accounts)
SmallRabbit
Smartaction
Topman21 (Dramatically destroyed this account just to punish LDL and Invincible49).
notscam420
Xavi20
All his schemes have been betrayed by invincible49 and he wants to take invisible revenge by thinking of me as invincible49. Kakatua/Xavi20/SmallRabbit/Smartaction/topman21/notscam420 has proof of hundreds of scams in the links above.
I will tell you the whole story of this plot, so you can easily understand how I was framed here.
The incident happened a long time ago when a manager named "Kakatua" was running a forum project with his multi account group. Then a famous user of my Bengali community "invincible49" introduced the Kakatua group as a multi group. And their accounts are given negative trust for the offense of multiple accounts.
Since then, the "Kakatua" group has developed a grudge against invincible49, and the revenge of that grudge is the current event.
The Kakatua group didn't stop after getting feedback from 34 other accounts including kakatua. From then on began the "SmallRabbit" management fraud. Their journey could not go far. Invincible stops them from cheating and destroys the entire group by putting them under a penalty.
Since then he distanced himself from Bounty Manager and started his journey with a bought account "Smartaction" and he started working on a reputable campaign. But even from there invincible49 caught him and managed to get the account back to its original owner.
In each case invincible49 then plays a role in delivering the cheating cycle.
Now the bottom line is that the cheating cycle has been repeatedly damaged by invincible49 but in no case they have been able to retaliate. As a result, the fraud circle later compared invincible49 to me and started thinking that I (LDL) was personally invincible49 (Now inactive) and they took a kind of invisible revenge on me with their created group (nitscam420/Xavi20/Topman21....). Forcing report and sending a planned $40 bitcoin (to my LDL address) connected to (Topman21) report which was all their planned plot or animosity.
I have a request for you to think about it. If I (LDL) were multi of topman21 could I self harm myself. Actually I am caught in an invisible web of deception. Please think about it and then decide. I am waiting for your decision.
Proof :
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5234050.msg54059655#msg54059655
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg54075994#msg54075994
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5234050.msg54403983#msg54403983
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5248670.msg54448749#msg54448749
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5234050.msg57621003#msg57621003
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5351159.msg57633244#msg57633244
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5234050.msg57640947#msg57640947
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5365814.msg58402850#msg58402850
Kakatua(34+ accounts)
SmallRabbit
Smartaction
Topman21 (Dramatically destroyed this account just to punish LDL and Invincible49).
notscam420
Xavi20
All his schemes have been betrayed by invincible49 and he wants to take invisible revenge by thinking of me as invincible49. Kakatua/Xavi20/SmallRabbit/Smartaction/topman21/notscam420 has proof of hundreds of scams in the links above.
When you weren't under pressure, you could create better stories. You don't have any proofs that the Kakatua group believes you are invincible49.
Topman21's marking by lovesmayfamilis as a sold or hacked account in July 2022 has evidence.
Topman21 was purchased or hacked to punish LDL? Topman21 punished LDL by sending merits? Topman21 punished LDL by making it its favorite to send merits? Topman21 once more punished LDL by sending $40 six months later? What a clever way to exact revenge.
This address was used several times so I am assuming this is not the first time someone pretended to sell accounts.
I think there is zero chances someone would intentionally pick exactly this address posted from LDL, especially since he doesn't have any reputation in forum like he claims and he exchanged merits with topman21.
This is obviously one of his his alt accounts:
https://i.ibb.co/31NRZqp/img54773afee53d6b42b3487c72ec488703.jpg
https://bpip.org/smerit.aspx?to=LDL&from=topman21
I think there is zero chances someone would intentionally pick exactly this address posted from LDL, especially since he doesn't have any reputation in forum like he claims and he exchanged merits with topman21.
This is obviously one of his his alt accounts:
https://i.ibb.co/31NRZqp/img54773afee53d6b42b3487c72ec488703.jpg
https://bpip.org/smerit.aspx?to=LDL&from=topman21
Alhamdulillah. Today is our holy Friday Jumuah here. I was busy in namaz so I could not reply you in time. Hope I will reply you.
You were busy. Is this the reason you accidentally gave an address associated with LDL?
Re: ☑ [ANN] ☰ [ ICO 06|04|2017 ] ☰ Humaniq — Discover the unbanked
Weekly update
For this week, devs have completed two important tasks:
- Devs have developed a new onboarding process, which significantly improves the way our users are introduced to the financial functionality of the app.
- A new, completely reworked referral system. It will allow us to expand within the vast network of ambassadors.
For this week, devs have completed two important tasks:
- Devs have developed a new onboarding process, which significantly improves the way our users are introduced to the financial functionality of the app.
- A new, completely reworked referral system. It will allow us to expand within the vast network of ambassadors.
You should at least quoted this or inform us because you sounds plagiarizing.
Re: [ICO] EOZ LENDING PLATFORM POWERED BY ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK
is a project that can enter fast and such projects can get a quick investment. This is a nice profit opportunity in the short term. Lucky for those who found this project. he has a great opportunity! Join
Yeah. The project is good but you are posting nonsense shit here.
I haven't seen anybody post about what would be my biggest worry if I were trying out alternative block chains. I realize this may be perceived as "Gavin is FUD'ding anything that isn't bitcoin!" (FUD == Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt) But I think some of you might be forgetting some basic computer security fundamentals in the excitement to be early adopters.
When I first heard about bitcoin, my questions were:
1) Can it possibly work (do the ideas for how it works make sense)?
2) Is it a scam?
3) If it is not a scam, could it open my computer up to viruses/trojans if I run it?
I answered those questions by:
1) Reading and understanding Satoshi's whitepaper. Then thinking about it for a day or two and reading it again.
2) Finding out everything I could about the project. I read every forum thread here (there were probably under a hundred threads back then) and read Satoshi's initial postings on the crypto mailing list.
3) Downloaded and skimmed the source code to see if it looked vulnerable to buffer overflow or other remotely exploitable attacks.
If I were going to experiment with an alternative block-chain, I'd go through the same process again. But I'm an old conservative fuddy-duddy.
If you want to take a risk on a brand-new alternative block-chain, I'd strongly suggest that you:
1) Run the software in a virtual machine or on a machine that doesn't contain anything valuable.
2) Don't invest more money or time than you can afford to lose.
3) Use a different passphrase at every exchange site.
The alternative block chain must be safe because it has been a source of income to many people. This alternative block chain has already helped so many people and from that it has been a very good help to everyone. Knowing that this block chain has provided financial needs of the people.When I first heard about bitcoin, my questions were:
1) Can it possibly work (do the ideas for how it works make sense)?
2) Is it a scam?
3) If it is not a scam, could it open my computer up to viruses/trojans if I run it?
I answered those questions by:
1) Reading and understanding Satoshi's whitepaper. Then thinking about it for a day or two and reading it again.
2) Finding out everything I could about the project. I read every forum thread here (there were probably under a hundred threads back then) and read Satoshi's initial postings on the crypto mailing list.
3) Downloaded and skimmed the source code to see if it looked vulnerable to buffer overflow or other remotely exploitable attacks.
If I were going to experiment with an alternative block-chain, I'd go through the same process again. But I'm an old conservative fuddy-duddy.
If you want to take a risk on a brand-new alternative block-chain, I'd strongly suggest that you:
1) Run the software in a virtual machine or on a machine that doesn't contain anything valuable.
2) Don't invest more money or time than you can afford to lose.
3) Use a different passphrase at every exchange site.
You are a funny bounty hunter Sarah08. Blockchains need to be safe of course in order to be utilized effectively by mainstream people.
Re: [ANN] Litecoin - a lite version of Bitcoin. Launched!
Hi All,
Good to see some projections for LC. I was initially excited and invested in LC but later on after closely observing the market i am doubting , what makes LC to succeed. There is enormous competition out there and it all depends on what you bring to the table.
All the comments i am seeing here about BCH is at $350 we will be at $2k one day seems silly and baseless. What makes you think LC will thrive in future while it has been lagging behind so badly to BTC.
Let me know if i am missing something. XMR and ZEC seems to be adding some value but I don't see why public get attracted to LC to make it silver of crypto.
-Bitty
Good to see some projections for LC. I was initially excited and invested in LC but later on after closely observing the market i am doubting , what makes LC to succeed. There is enormous competition out there and it all depends on what you bring to the table.
All the comments i am seeing here about BCH is at $350 we will be at $2k one day seems silly and baseless. What makes you think LC will thrive in future while it has been lagging behind so badly to BTC.
Let me know if i am missing something. XMR and ZEC seems to be adding some value but I don't see why public get attracted to LC to make it silver of crypto.
-Bitty
Yes you mess something I guess. Is there really Litecoin Cash right now or you are investing on it to happen soon?
Re: [ANN] AMP - The Currency That Powers Your Attention On Synereo
and they would burn many coins as they had told in february. And they had also told that they will give maximum 20 million amps which they have set aside as rewards for boosting adoption of users
I don't see any blog posts in Feb 2017. Could you provide a link to these claims?
they had stated all these things in some posts here in this thread
It is really scary to long hold amp due to its supeeeer heavy supplies under the team. Why can't they commit to community like for instance they will freeze it unless a private investor is interested otc. Or let's say they guarantee to dump as high as 50,000 tokens monthly.
Re: [ANN] AMP - The Currency That Powers Your Attention On Synereo
Do AMP holders have to take care in anyway with regard to the upcoming Bitcoin developments (SegWit2x)? Is there any specific precaution I need to take?
I think OMNI has announced that they will stay on the longest chain, thus AMP will be on the longest chain.
So there is nothing to worry about. You should probably not do AMP transactions on the blockchain until Segwit is not active.
Thank you for your response. And is it possible that AMP also splits and runs on two chains? Could a scenario happen similar to Bitcoin holders that might afterwards not only hold Bitcoin Core tokens but also Bitcoin Cash tokens?
I would like to know that, too.
Same here brother. And I am very interested if Amp is really going to decide on burning those excessive coins being owned by the team. Burn it please for the glory of Amp.
Accusation: irfan_pak10 Unprofessionalism as Campaign Manager
This has been in a roller coaster ride because of its poor management by IRFAN. I would like to point out one by one on his lapses:
1. On June 30 there were some few of participants who joined in the Adex Bounty Campaign (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1980387.0) and as they joined the campaign, noticed that on the Spreadsheet the last few participants who joined were deleted because the Campaign Manager did not lock the Spreadsheet thus it allowed people to delete freely what was written or posted on the sheet. I don't want to pinpoint who did that because obviously I don't think Irfan found out who the culprit was. Mind you, a lot joined "last minute" obviously it was because they saw that the ICO was about to sold out.The application also was not closed so that means it was still open for new participants.
2. Now when he found out on that same day what happened on the Spreadsheet, Irfan then CLOSED the application for participants and changed the deadline on the Spreadsheet to 06.29 Thursday but on the first page he posted there that the deadline was a Friday June 30 at 23:59pm (Rule 7) which then Irfan acclaimed he was "TYPO". I think I remember the same incident that happened on the iDice Campaign too that the same Campaign Manager said he got "TYPO" too. (If this has been happening not just once, don't you think you need to be more accurate the next time you are handling a campaign, because it would be a redundant reason to get the same error over and over again.)
3. So when Irfan changed his rules, a lot obviously complained in the bounty thread and even replied to some post and stated he will fix it. And even corrected the mistake and said We are going to count 30th June in the previous week. Those who joined the campaign on this date will get stakes in the first week. So again changed the rules back again to the original Rule #7.
4. And lastly regarding the stakes on the Spreadsheet, Irfan gave chance to some participants and gave stakes to those who completed the 10 posts on June 30 and then just today, he made a change again and decided without any further explanation of some sort that the stakes was again changed to only half the amount instead of the full amount of stakes before the distribution.
If I were to rate 1 as the highest and 10 as the lowest you could possibly rate a campaign manager, I would rate IRFAN 8.5 out of 10 for him handling this campaign, maybe because you handled a lot of campaign already and you are not able to manage well this campaign or you were out of focus because of the many campaigns you are handling but so far out of all the managers you are one of the worst because of how poorly you manage this campaign and the many issues that were thrown at you.
1. On June 30 there were some few of participants who joined in the Adex Bounty Campaign (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1980387.0) and as they joined the campaign, noticed that on the Spreadsheet the last few participants who joined were deleted because the Campaign Manager did not lock the Spreadsheet thus it allowed people to delete freely what was written or posted on the sheet. I don't want to pinpoint who did that because obviously I don't think Irfan found out who the culprit was. Mind you, a lot joined "last minute" obviously it was because they saw that the ICO was about to sold out.The application also was not closed so that means it was still open for new participants.
2. Now when he found out on that same day what happened on the Spreadsheet, Irfan then CLOSED the application for participants and changed the deadline on the Spreadsheet to 06.29 Thursday but on the first page he posted there that the deadline was a Friday June 30 at 23:59pm (Rule 7) which then Irfan acclaimed he was "TYPO". I think I remember the same incident that happened on the iDice Campaign too that the same Campaign Manager said he got "TYPO" too. (If this has been happening not just once, don't you think you need to be more accurate the next time you are handling a campaign, because it would be a redundant reason to get the same error over and over again.)
3. So when Irfan changed his rules, a lot obviously complained in the bounty thread and even replied to some post and stated he will fix it. And even corrected the mistake and said We are going to count 30th June in the previous week. Those who joined the campaign on this date will get stakes in the first week. So again changed the rules back again to the original Rule #7.
4. And lastly regarding the stakes on the Spreadsheet, Irfan gave chance to some participants and gave stakes to those who completed the 10 posts on June 30 and then just today, he made a change again and decided without any further explanation of some sort that the stakes was again changed to only half the amount instead of the full amount of stakes before the distribution.
If I were to rate 1 as the highest and 10 as the lowest you could possibly rate a campaign manager, I would rate IRFAN 8.5 out of 10 for him handling this campaign, maybe because you handled a lot of campaign already and you are not able to manage well this campaign or you were out of focus because of the many campaigns you are handling but so far out of all the managers you are one of the worst because of how poorly you manage this campaign and the many issues that were thrown at you.