Search content
Sort by

Showing 8 of 8 results by Armstronghater
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
Armstronghater
on 19/05/2020, 03:58:48 UTC
This just in: Armstrong still a fraud trying to rip people off.
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
Armstronghater
on 05/05/2020, 17:22:14 UTC
Hey Marty, we're still waiting for the Euro to crash.

And your so-called super computer didn't see the March crash coming, the oil crash, gold's recent surge above $1700, etc. 

If Socrates really worked, you wouldn't need to charge $500 for worthless reports as you'd already have all the money in the world.

You're no better than a sports gambling tout. But keep ripping people off so you can pay your Florida beach mortgage.

Btw, nice lies about advising governments. Never any proof of that.




Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
Armstronghater
on 04/05/2020, 21:18:56 UTC
The monthly forecasting array on the Dow Jones was showing a panic cycle in March 2020 as far back as SEPTEMBER 2019. it called for February 2020 as a turning point which produced a high, March as the next which produced a low which was also a panic cycle, April was the next turning point which produced a high, now we have May which should produce a low on an intraday/closing basis.

See link for monthly array in September 2019:https://ibb.co/YWqR9Yp
That is what real PROOF looks like,  there is tremendous value in Armstrong's work.

Have you ever thought for a single moment that you could be wrong? People with real intelligence doubt and question things but coder is utterly convinced that I am Armstrong based on a PM message, as usual always jumping to conclusions  Cheesy  how stupid and naive do you have to be? The only thing it proves  is that you must have some mental disability.

Every single conclusion by coder requires a massive leap of faith.


Sure, easy to go back and change something to make you look right, that's what Armstrong is generally known for.

I know I'm not wrong because I bought the scam gold report in 2015 and subscribed to Socrates (what a mistake).

I also like how you blame the consumer, instead of admitting the arrays are poorly done and confusing as hell.

There was never anything mentioning a crash in late February/March.

Also, you haven't responded to Armstrong's wrong calls on bitcoin, the Euro and gold.

How Armstrong sleeps at night is beyond me, but he did dupe Japanese investors out of a ton money in the 1990s, which is why he went to jail.
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
Armstronghater
on 04/05/2020, 16:25:50 UTC
https://vimeo.com/400842901

This was from his conference Oct 19.

I think Anonymous Coder is the real fraud trying to promote his website.  Think, why would someone be so obsessed with hating on another man every day?  If you don't find Socrates useful just don't use it, everything ain't for everyone..

Martin has  been spot on the DOW.  JAN  2018 called a sell to the day.  Then foretasted a likely down to sideways market with, ideally a low in jan 2020.  After the 18 high was exceeded we warned that a high on the 2020 turning point would indicate a severe correction there after.

I have never seen anyone else even remotely more useful as Martin.  The haters here are ether looking sort term or completely do not understand how to use socrates.  I'ts not a magic computer giving you buy and sell signals, more like weather forecasting.  Martins forecasts are very long term and he is often looking at charts where a year or quarter are one candle. 

As far as reversals and arrays, they tend to work great in a trending/volatile market even on the daily.  Not so well in chop but you can trade against them as support/resistance on a range.

As for him spending 11 years in jail, he was held in contempt the entire time without a charge and the people he supposedly defrauded did everything they could to help him and come to his defense...

Anyone who is in the ECM group please send me an invite.

Haha, what a crock.

So explain Armstrong's missed call in Bitcoin?

Armstrong said the overall stock market would top in January. It didn't. Armstrong also never mentioned anything about a panic in the stock markets in March.

Armstrong's 2015 gold report was completely useless as the benchmarks were either wrong or signaled nothing. 

Still waiting for the collapse of the Euro Armstrong was calling for from 2015-17. Still waiting for Armstrong's $5000 gold call.

This post is basically Armstrong to the tee. He'll claim he nailed events in the past (which he didn't), provide vague language where he can claim anything, then blame others for his failings.

Armstrong = fraud.
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
Armstronghater
on 29/04/2020, 15:04:32 UTC
It should be noted that people who give a voice to people like Armstrong are nearly as bad. This includes Jim Puplava and the guys on financialsense and Eric King.
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
Armstronghater
on 25/04/2020, 20:42:29 UTC
...The downplaying of the virus by Armstrong could not only be dangerous financially, but also healthwise.

He does not care. He cares about the number of people to defraud with his scam. There is an inexhaustible pool of right wing idiots who are anti-government that he preys on and he aligns his campaigns with that potential. He gives them all they need to boost their confidence in him - the stuff they want to hear.

Besides he is pissed off that he cannot have his conferences.

Every single defrauded person should report their case at econsumer.gov


Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting at page 273 to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.


Can you point to which route on econsumer.gov we should take to file a complaint?
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
Armstronghater
on 24/04/2020, 06:31:51 UTC
The other hilarious thing is MA claiming his machine predicted COVID-19 and the ensuing economic carnage it has caused. Yet again, that same (cycle?) playbook is rolled out where MA claims his machine predicted the event - but only AFTER it happened. The very same thing happened with the REPO crisis in September, which alas saw an expensive "report" available to buy. The same thing with COVID-19, only this time a virtual webinar is being hosted, because the virus has brutally cancelled MA's only pay cheque this year.


Having attended his 2018 WEC in Orlando, I can you tell you this:

The main prediction from 2020-2024 was for a COMMODITY BOOM, where CA and AU would be the big winners over other major Western economies. Based on a massive decline in consumer and therefore business demand in the coming years, both because of unemployment/bankruptcy and simply permanently changed behaviours, that now seems unlikely. Oil has been declining since 2014 and it looks unlikely that trend will reverse, not least with renewables becoming more mainstream.

At the 2018 Orlando WEC, not once did MA mention:
  • 2020 would see an economic crash that would be as historic as 1929
  • Oil futures would turn negative for the first time in history
  • Major economies would see the highest increase in unemployed in history
  • That this would all be caused by an overreaction to an unknown virus
...

Thank you for your precious review.  I checked the date of Armstrong's commodity boom post on financialsense.com, and it was "right on target", exactly landing at the PEAK of $CRB index.  As I have said many times, you gain a LOT more money by trading AGAINST Armstrong's advice.  For Armstrong, I'm sure he can twist his words and brains and convince readers of all kinds that

a commodity boom means NEGATIVE crude oil price!

That should go into historical failures of predictions made by anyone.  A boom is a NEGATIVE price?!



FinanacialSense was dead wrong on tons of things as well around the 2008 crash (which is why I stopped listening shortly after).
Puplava and company were making fun of people for buying treasury bonds. A few weeks later they said they were then buying treasury bonds. They also were very bullish on junior mining stocks, which then plummeted like crazy.
Puplava at one point also claimed his favorite investments were corn, natural gas and silver.  All were much, much lower a year later.
Eric King should be added to the list of "experts" who have given some really crappy financial advice.

Honestly, the fact financialsense even has Armstrong on should tell you a bit about it.
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
Armstronghater
on 20/04/2020, 11:40:56 UTC
I was foolish enough to buy one of Armstrong's gold reports four years back and was a subscriber to Socrates for a few months.

The Gold report was a complete waste. It was 90 percent about history. His benchmarks were meaningless and incorrect, and no matter what happened, Armstrong could point to some random vague sentence and claim something.

Socrates was just as bad (only cheaper). The arrays were confusing as hell, usually never correct, and the directional changes never happened. In the summaries, there were odd spelling mistakes. Socrates is allegedly a computer that is never wrong, so how could it misspell simple words?

Armstrong probably duped me out of $900 over 3 years.  He should be in jail for being the biggest fraud in history.

Also, still waiting for the collapse of the Euro he has been calling to happen for 4 years.

You'd think Armstrong would have seen a 35 percent market decline coming from late February to late March. He didn't.
On his own blog, one of his fake emails claimed he nailed the top of the market in January (which he obviously didn't as it peaked Feb. 19 or 20).