Search content
Sort by
Showing 4 of 4 results by BATM
No, this great thanks. You made my point exactly- no one has anything constructive to say about posts, unless those posts are scammy in nature or attack the credibility of the forum. These replies being made are the epitome of what I speak- you don't get involved unless it's to trash something, or defend this useless forum. Good luck- an admin can please delete my account. This place is trash.
The general condition of this forum seems quite BAD. Is it nothing but hawks and scammers in here? I see NOTHING that leads me to believe otherwise.
Apparently with the market being on its ass... the sane experienced people don't even bother coming in here?
It's looking like the crypto community would be better off WITHOUT this forum.
It's quite pathetic honestly.
Apparently with the market being on its ass... the sane experienced people don't even bother coming in here?
It's looking like the crypto community would be better off WITHOUT this forum.
It's quite pathetic honestly.
Unique Opportunity OUR AFFILIATE PROGRAM. Bounties Look to Complex.
OUR "PROJECT" CRYPTO AFFILIATE PROGRAM
WE NEED INPUT FOR OUR AFFILIATE PROGRAM IN GENERAL. WE ARE NOT YET DISCLOSING WHO WE ARE AT THIS TIME.
We are not ones for flashy, BS. We do not believe in wasting money in unnecessary over-the-top presentations. We would rather put that money directly into our affiliate program payouts.
Our website retail platform is already established, in the United States. We have many accomplishments, but so you are not misled, think "small" but "powerful".
We personally hate bounty programs. They look like spam marketing. They seem to have complex if then, so what do this, garbage.
We have our own affiliate program already IN PLACE.
Our affiliate program provides you with an id specific to you, which you embed into your referral link(s). We provide you easy implementation instructions and email support should you desire it.
You would also receive a second link that will show your live-time stat tracking of visitors sent to our offering, for your id.
Our project launch is firm, we are launching a branded cryptocurrency. There is no "project didn't launch" BS.
We are not paying based on "funds raised" we are simply paying "x" amount for each unique visitor sent to review our offering. This is because you will be directly involved with our "project" marketing phase. Our token will NEVER be offered directly from our site. It ONLY will be offered directly from a decentralized exchange. Therefore, tokens are released to referrers only at certain intervals of "project".
As we usually do our own thing, and always will, we have decided that rather than look up a bunch of shyt bounty programs that "may or may not have worked", we would rather ASK DIRECTLY FOR INPUT.
A few main points of our affiliate program:
#1. PARTICIPATION IN OUR AFFILIATE PROGRAM WILL BE LIMITED IN PARTICIPATION.
#2. YOU MUST APPLY TO OUR AFFILIATE PROGRAM. NO FORMS, JUST EASY EMAIL APPLICATION PER OUR DIRECTIONS.
#3. WE ARE LOOKING FOR HIGH QUALITY CONTENT AFFILIATES. (Can be short content, just NO LINK SPAM).
#4. A HUMAN WILL REVIEW EACH APPLICANT TO HAND SELECT PARTICIPANTS.
#5. WE MAY SELECT 20 AFFILIATES, 30, 60 MAYBE MORE, DEPENDING UPON QUALITY OF APPLICANTS.
#6. WE WOULD RATHER HAVE 15 AMAZING CONTENT AFFILIATES THAN 1000 LINK SPAMMERS.
Our Simple questions(answer any, one or none, if you prefer to make your own comment):
A. Do you believe our required affiliate applicantion process will hurt or help us?
B. Based on your experience, what do you believe is the best way for us to attract quality, experienced crypto content & general content affiliates?
C. We are considering recruitng an experienced Crypto Community Individual as our Senior Crypto Affiliate, with creative license to direct recruitment tactics, does such a thing exist or should we make it happen?
WE NEED INPUT FOR OUR AFFILIATE PROGRAM IN GENERAL. WE ARE NOT YET DISCLOSING WHO WE ARE AT THIS TIME.
We are not ones for flashy, BS. We do not believe in wasting money in unnecessary over-the-top presentations. We would rather put that money directly into our affiliate program payouts.
Our website retail platform is already established, in the United States. We have many accomplishments, but so you are not misled, think "small" but "powerful".
We personally hate bounty programs. They look like spam marketing. They seem to have complex if then, so what do this, garbage.
We have our own affiliate program already IN PLACE.
Our affiliate program provides you with an id specific to you, which you embed into your referral link(s). We provide you easy implementation instructions and email support should you desire it.
You would also receive a second link that will show your live-time stat tracking of visitors sent to our offering, for your id.
Our project launch is firm, we are launching a branded cryptocurrency. There is no "project didn't launch" BS.
We are not paying based on "funds raised" we are simply paying "x" amount for each unique visitor sent to review our offering. This is because you will be directly involved with our "project" marketing phase. Our token will NEVER be offered directly from our site. It ONLY will be offered directly from a decentralized exchange. Therefore, tokens are released to referrers only at certain intervals of "project".
As we usually do our own thing, and always will, we have decided that rather than look up a bunch of shyt bounty programs that "may or may not have worked", we would rather ASK DIRECTLY FOR INPUT.
A few main points of our affiliate program:
#1. PARTICIPATION IN OUR AFFILIATE PROGRAM WILL BE LIMITED IN PARTICIPATION.
#2. YOU MUST APPLY TO OUR AFFILIATE PROGRAM. NO FORMS, JUST EASY EMAIL APPLICATION PER OUR DIRECTIONS.
#3. WE ARE LOOKING FOR HIGH QUALITY CONTENT AFFILIATES. (Can be short content, just NO LINK SPAM).
#4. A HUMAN WILL REVIEW EACH APPLICANT TO HAND SELECT PARTICIPANTS.
#5. WE MAY SELECT 20 AFFILIATES, 30, 60 MAYBE MORE, DEPENDING UPON QUALITY OF APPLICANTS.
#6. WE WOULD RATHER HAVE 15 AMAZING CONTENT AFFILIATES THAN 1000 LINK SPAMMERS.
Our Simple questions(answer any, one or none, if you prefer to make your own comment):
A. Do you believe our required affiliate applicantion process will hurt or help us?
B. Based on your experience, what do you believe is the best way for us to attract quality, experienced crypto content & general content affiliates?
C. We are considering recruitng an experienced Crypto Community Individual as our Senior Crypto Affiliate, with creative license to direct recruitment tactics, does such a thing exist or should we make it happen?
Requesting feedback about non-flashy, LOW COST offerings- utility token
Hi, New to the forum but have been involved with crypto for quite some time. Not a whale, and I do not have ANY professional coding experience. Please excuse me if I use "I" and "we" interchangeably or in the wrong places. I have a habit to referring to myself as "we" even when I mean "I'". It is because my entire life I have never forgotten the people that got me to where I am. It has always been about "us".
I am going to intentionally try to be vaguely specific. I do not want to suggest any affiliations or anything- I am sincerely curious about the community's thoughts on very low start-up tokens with very low market-caps.
Please read to end and hopefully I will get some feedback.
I have owned a business for a number of years that has actual sales and trademarked brand recognition. We are not a big box store, we are a very small but successful project in the retail sector. I have thought about a utility token(by my definition) for years and I have finally decided to take the plunge and gather some opinions.
1. How does the community view offerings that are not from some fancy "professional listing service" or one that does not use a high tech white paper(we would make our NEW business plan which incorporates our token functionality with our website AND physical location(s), public instead)?
2. Although I will be making my presentation on our site, as I mentioned earlier- we are not spending tens of thousands of dollars to get set up. A- we don't have that kind of money, our money is committed elsewhere. B- I honestly and sincerely believe it should not be necessary. Is a self-written business plan by a self-taught business owner an immediate turn-off?
3. We will not be hiring some "amazing team" full of programmers. Honestly- we would contract our newly desired website development(we almost have to to integrate so that we do not spend money on an entirely new platform). We are NOT building a blockchain, only offering a utility token on a different existing blockchain. Employees will be put in place only as necessary. As we are retailers- that means the shipping department and possibly data entry/minor website development and maintenance. Is there ever a case in which not wasting money on a flashy-qualified to the NINES team of 3 or 8 people acceptable?
Our presentation would obviously include a lengthy write-up of who we are and how we came to exist. It will mention my belief that our branded token is required not only to enhance a buyers experience but to add new crypto users. Here is an excerpt from our business plan which does not disclose anything- just gives an insight to where we are coming from:
[excerpt]Yes, we understand the entire economy is based on trade- but when you analyze what TYPES OF TRADES.... no one is going to get excited or jump through hoops to buy a pair of socks or some groceries with cryptocurrency. It is why IN DEMAND APPRECIATING PHYSICAL ASSETS cannot be beaten (just like location location location in real estate). High demand PHYSICAL items are what is lacking from the crypto equations. It's why nearly everyone has heard about the guy that bought a Lambo WITH BITCOIN. Not many care if someone buys an everyday common staple with crypto (not yet anyway).[/excerpt]
We are not introducing new technology- we are hoping to introduce a new mindset of target user(our primary customer) and why our project will succeed. Would you give consideration to a project built around such an approach?
4. We want to do offerings by round- with the first round obviously being for development of what we declare necessary to that point(website update/development). Round 2 would then only be offered after we have proven what we did as a result of round 1(which means there is a gap between round 1 and round 2 for us to accomplish what we said we would). I personally believe this is not only a recipe for wasteful spending- but there is no point in taking on such massive reporting liabilities the first year. Would this be more appealing or less appealing AND do you believe it could possibly make each additional round more successful?
5. I truly believe that a small startup with a proven business history far outweighs the risks associated with monumental "new technology" start-up projects that are mired in development challenges, theoretical concepts and massive expenditures. It is my belief that starting with a realistically LOW market cap leaves room for the market to try out and appreciate our utility token. Remember, this token would be utilized on an already existing retail platform. Do you feel that a small-minded approach that keeps the token holders in mind is an acceptable way to go? Is it possibly MORE interesting to have a 3 million market cap than going for a 30 million market cap(ours would likely be in the range of only 2 to 3 million at the end of all rounds- OR hard cap=3M)? (This question is asked because there are some absolutely ABSURD valuations going on out there- if ours was proportional we should come in at 80 billion dollars market cap, LOL)
6. We believe that offering prices are out of hand. Is there a preference FOR YOU in this example- Let's say we want a market cap of 2M(usd) which is calculated off of our 5 year projected gross sales TOTAL REVENUE. (small right?) So- would we be better offering:
A) 200,000,000 coins at one cent each usd= 2M cap
B) 20,000,000 coins at 10 cents usd= 2M cap
C) 2,000,000 coins at $1 usd each?
We will also give you our take- WE PREFER A.
We want the smaller cap with more coins. We believe high offering prices look ridiculous and often result in a price spike and then obliteration of the token price. Do you prefer A, B or C? As our token has an actual REAL WORLD USE on our site- (I can't say more than that) we want the price to reflect the fact that we are starting nearly at zero and the actual USE of the token will promote demand.)
I look forward to reading thoughts, suggestions or trolls' comments. Even trolls can set thoughts down a path in which you had no intention going
I will apologize again for being vaguely specific- hopefully this post is not confusing. It is SO tempting to just post some of the plan, but I will NOT(yet). Thank you!
I am going to intentionally try to be vaguely specific. I do not want to suggest any affiliations or anything- I am sincerely curious about the community's thoughts on very low start-up tokens with very low market-caps.
Please read to end and hopefully I will get some feedback.
I have owned a business for a number of years that has actual sales and trademarked brand recognition. We are not a big box store, we are a very small but successful project in the retail sector. I have thought about a utility token(by my definition) for years and I have finally decided to take the plunge and gather some opinions.
1. How does the community view offerings that are not from some fancy "professional listing service" or one that does not use a high tech white paper(we would make our NEW business plan which incorporates our token functionality with our website AND physical location(s), public instead)?
2. Although I will be making my presentation on our site, as I mentioned earlier- we are not spending tens of thousands of dollars to get set up. A- we don't have that kind of money, our money is committed elsewhere. B- I honestly and sincerely believe it should not be necessary. Is a self-written business plan by a self-taught business owner an immediate turn-off?
3. We will not be hiring some "amazing team" full of programmers. Honestly- we would contract our newly desired website development(we almost have to to integrate so that we do not spend money on an entirely new platform). We are NOT building a blockchain, only offering a utility token on a different existing blockchain. Employees will be put in place only as necessary. As we are retailers- that means the shipping department and possibly data entry/minor website development and maintenance. Is there ever a case in which not wasting money on a flashy-qualified to the NINES team of 3 or 8 people acceptable?
Our presentation would obviously include a lengthy write-up of who we are and how we came to exist. It will mention my belief that our branded token is required not only to enhance a buyers experience but to add new crypto users. Here is an excerpt from our business plan which does not disclose anything- just gives an insight to where we are coming from:
[excerpt]Yes, we understand the entire economy is based on trade- but when you analyze what TYPES OF TRADES.... no one is going to get excited or jump through hoops to buy a pair of socks or some groceries with cryptocurrency. It is why IN DEMAND APPRECIATING PHYSICAL ASSETS cannot be beaten (just like location location location in real estate). High demand PHYSICAL items are what is lacking from the crypto equations. It's why nearly everyone has heard about the guy that bought a Lambo WITH BITCOIN. Not many care if someone buys an everyday common staple with crypto (not yet anyway).[/excerpt]
We are not introducing new technology- we are hoping to introduce a new mindset of target user(our primary customer) and why our project will succeed. Would you give consideration to a project built around such an approach?
4. We want to do offerings by round- with the first round obviously being for development of what we declare necessary to that point(website update/development). Round 2 would then only be offered after we have proven what we did as a result of round 1(which means there is a gap between round 1 and round 2 for us to accomplish what we said we would). I personally believe this is not only a recipe for wasteful spending- but there is no point in taking on such massive reporting liabilities the first year. Would this be more appealing or less appealing AND do you believe it could possibly make each additional round more successful?
5. I truly believe that a small startup with a proven business history far outweighs the risks associated with monumental "new technology" start-up projects that are mired in development challenges, theoretical concepts and massive expenditures. It is my belief that starting with a realistically LOW market cap leaves room for the market to try out and appreciate our utility token. Remember, this token would be utilized on an already existing retail platform. Do you feel that a small-minded approach that keeps the token holders in mind is an acceptable way to go? Is it possibly MORE interesting to have a 3 million market cap than going for a 30 million market cap(ours would likely be in the range of only 2 to 3 million at the end of all rounds- OR hard cap=3M)? (This question is asked because there are some absolutely ABSURD valuations going on out there- if ours was proportional we should come in at 80 billion dollars market cap, LOL)
6. We believe that offering prices are out of hand. Is there a preference FOR YOU in this example- Let's say we want a market cap of 2M(usd) which is calculated off of our 5 year projected gross sales TOTAL REVENUE. (small right?) So- would we be better offering:
A) 200,000,000 coins at one cent each usd= 2M cap
B) 20,000,000 coins at 10 cents usd= 2M cap
C) 2,000,000 coins at $1 usd each?
We will also give you our take- WE PREFER A.
We want the smaller cap with more coins. We believe high offering prices look ridiculous and often result in a price spike and then obliteration of the token price. Do you prefer A, B or C? As our token has an actual REAL WORLD USE on our site- (I can't say more than that) we want the price to reflect the fact that we are starting nearly at zero and the actual USE of the token will promote demand.)
I look forward to reading thoughts, suggestions or trolls' comments. Even trolls can set thoughts down a path in which you had no intention going
I will apologize again for being vaguely specific- hopefully this post is not confusing. It is SO tempting to just post some of the plan, but I will NOT(yet). Thank you!